UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act ofOF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant | Filed by a |
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule | ||
Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
Definitive Additional Materials | ||
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
No fee | ||
Fee paid previously with preliminary | ||
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and |
Our Strategy
We seek to create stockholder valuemaximize risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders through scale, expertisegrowth in earnings and relationshipsdividends from investments in our business segments, which are driven by the aging populationhigh-quality real estate that is essential for healthcare discovery and the desire for improved health.delivery. The core elementscornerstones of our strategy are to:
Own and develophigh-quality,irreplaceablehealthcarereal estate in markets where we have scale and expertise, creating a competitive advantage. | Grow our | Be a good partner to | Maintain a lowcost of capital anda strong balancesheet with BBB+/Baa1 investment grade credit ratings, which will provide financial strength through industry and economic cycles. | Lead with a people-firstculture that attracts, develops and retains top-tier talent. We believe that diversity |
What’s new in this proxy statement • Transformative business combination with Physicians Realty Trust • New independent Board Chair appointed in 2023 and Board refreshment in 2023 and 2024 • Expanded description of governance practices • Preview of 10-year sustainability strategic roadmap | ||
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (NYSE: DOC), an S&P 500 company, invests in real estate serving healthcare delivery and discovery in the United States. We are headquartered in Denver, Colorado, with additional corporate offices in California, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Massachusetts and property management offices in several locations throughout the United States. On March 1, 2024, we closed a strategic merger with Physicians Realty Trust in an all-stock transaction that leverages the power of complementary platforms, increased scale and deep relationships to create value for both stockholders and tenants.
Who We Are
Healthpeak Properties, Inc., an S&P 500 company, invests in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. We are headquartered in Denver, Colorado, with additional offices in California, Tennessee and Massachusetts.
3 | 480 | 5.1% | 37 Years | ||||||
Business Segments | Properties(1) | Annualized Dividend Yield(2) | as a Public Company | ||||||
IRREPLACEABLE PORTFOLIO(1) 12.2 Million Sq. Ft. Life Science | SCALE $20 Billion Enterprise Value(3) | INVESTMENT GRADE S&P: BBB+ (Stable) | ESTABLISHED NYSE-Listed |
700+ Properties(1) | 7.0% Annualized | 38 Years as a Public Company | ||
IRREPLACEABLE PORTFOLIO(1) $21 Billion in Total Assets(2) | INVESTMENT GRADE S&P: BBB+ (Stable) | ESTABLISHED NYSE-Listed |
(1) | As of |
March 1, 2024. | |
(2) | Based on Healthpeak’s total assets plus Physicians Realty Trust’s total assets, in each case as of December 31, 2023. |
(3) | Based on Healthpeak’s common stock price of |
Outpatient Medical Outpatient services and healthcare provider visits are performed efficiently and conveniently | ||||
Lab New and innovative drugs, therapeutics and medical devices are developed in our | CCRC Offers seniors an active lifestyle, peace of mind, security and a continuum of care in a unique campus setting | |||
HEALTHONE SKY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER DENVER, CO | THE COVE AT OYSTER POINT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA | FREEDOM POINTE AT THE VILLAGES THE VILLAGES, FL |
Through February 9, 2023 we conducted our business through Healthpeak Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Old Healthpeak”). Effective as of February 10, 2023, Old Healthpeak completed a corporate reorganization into a holding company structure commonly referred to as an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust, or UPREIT. On February 10, 2023, Old Healthpeak converted to a Maryland limited liability company named Healthpeak OP, LLC. The holding company created for the UPREIT conversion, New Healthpeak, Inc., is now the parent company of Old Healthpeak and pursuant to a name change effectuated as part of the reorganization, is now known as Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (“New Healthpeak”). The business, management and board of directors of New Healthpeak, and the rights and limitations of New Healthpeak’s stockholders, immediately following the reorganization were identical to the business, management and board of directors of Old Healthpeak, and the rights and limitations of Old Healthpeak’s stockholders, immediately prior to the reorganization. The consolidated assets and liabilities of New Healthpeak immediately following the reorganization were the same as the consolidated assets and liabilities of Old Healthpeak immediately prior to the reorganization.Business Highlights (Legacy Healthpeak)
$1.78 | 5.2x | $750M | ||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted per common share for the year ended December 31, 2023(1) | Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre for the quarter ended December 31, 2023(1) | Long-Term Senior Unsecured Bonds Issued, at a Blended Yield of 5.36% | ||
5.5% | 4.8% | 5.1M | ||
Full-Year 2023 Diluted AFFO per Common Share Growth(2) | Full-Year 2023 Same-Store Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) Net Operating Income Growth(2) | Square Feet of Lease Executions(3) |
(1) | Diluted Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as Adjusted per common share and Net Debt to Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for real estate (“Adjusted EBITDAre”) are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP,” and such measures, “non-GAAP” measures). Adjusted EBITDAre is calculated based on fourth quarter annualized performance and Net Debt as of December 31, 2023. For the definitions and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, see Appendix A. |
(2) | Same-Store Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) Net Operating Income and Diluted Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”) per common share are non-GAAP financial measures. For the definitions and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, see Appendix A. |
(3) | Represents the total combined Outpatient Medical and Lab lease executions for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
New Healthpeak, as the successor to Old Healthpeak, is filing this proxy statement on behalf of Old Healthpeak for 2022 and on behalf of itself and Old Healthpeak for 2023. All references in this proxy statement to “we”, “our”, the “Company”, “Healthpeak” or “Healthpeak Properties, Inc.” refer to New Healthpeak for itself and as successor to Old Healthpeak, as applicable. More detailed information regarding the UPREIT reorganization can be found in our Form 8-K12B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 10, 2023.
1 |
Table of Contents
Go Green! To go paperless and receive electronic versions of the proxy statement and our annual report, please scan the code below and follow the instructions. |
2 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
FOR See pages FOR See pages 41–72 FOR See pages 76–78 Other business will be transacted as may properly come before the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Please submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible to instruct how your shares are to be voted at the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the meeting. If you later vote at the Annual Meeting, your previously submitted proxy or voting instructions will not be used. By Order of the Board of Directors, Carol B. Samaan Vice President, Associate General Counsel DATE AND TIME Thursday, April RECORD DATE Tuesday, March PLACE PROXY MATERIALS These proxy materials were first How to Vote BY INTERNET BY TELEPHONE 800–690–6903 BY MAIL Complete your proxy card and cast your vote by pre-paid post If you own shares of our common stock registered in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions they provide on how to vote your shares. Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials This proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, Annual Meeting Proposals
PROPOSALS 01 Election of EightEleven Directors 13–2312–2502 Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of 2023 Executive Compensation 03 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024 Proxy Voting
and Corporate Secretary
Denver, Colorado
March 13, 2024Logistics 27, 20239:3025, 2024
8:00 a.m. PacificCentral TimeWednesday,1, 20235, 2024Hilton Franklin Cool Springs
601 Corporate Centre Drive
Franklin, TN 37067PLACEAC Hotel by Marriott San Francisco
Airport/Oyster Point Waterfront
1333 Veterans Boulevard
South San Francisco, CA 94080Attendees are required to comply with all Federal, state, local and meeting place guidelines
made available to stockholders on
or about March 17, 202313, 2024STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD
www.proxyvote.com www.proxyvote.com02Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of 2022 Executive Compensation FORSee pages 40–75 03Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation 1 YEARSee page 41 04Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan BENEFICIAL OWNERSFORSee pages 76–8205Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2023 FORSee pages 86–88Other business will be transacted as may properly come before the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”).Beneficial OwnersProxy VotingPlease submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible to instruct how your shares are to be voted at the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the meeting. If you later vote at the Annual Meeting, your previously submitted proxy or voting instructions will not be used.By Order of the Board of Directors,Scott A. GrazianoSenior Vice President – Deputy General Counsel and Corporate SecretaryDenver, ColoradoMarch 17, 2023
20222023 (“Annual Report”) are available on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, which you can access by using the control number provided on your proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The materials are also available in the Investor Relations section of our website at ir.healthpeak.com. References to our websitewebsites in this proxy statement are provided for convenience only. Our website is for informational purposes only and the content oncontents of our website doesor information connected thereto are not constitutea part of this proxy statement.statement and are not deemed incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or any other public filing made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.20232024 PROXY STATEMENT3 Letter from Our
Board of Directors
As members of the Board of Directors,On your behalf, we thank you for your continued support of Healthpeak. We are committed to governing Healthpeak in a prudent and transparent manner and to delivering long-term value for you. We proactively oversee Healthpeak’s business strategy, corporate governance, executive compensation, corporate responsibility initiatives and ESG initiatives,risk management, among other things, on your behalf, and we are pleased to share with you the results of our efforts over the past year.
This year,
Most notably, we recently completed our transformative business combination with Physicians Realty Trust and added five new directors to our Board. We are pleased to welcome James B. Connor, former ChairmanJohn T. Thomas, who will serve as our Vice Chair, as well as Pamela J. Kessler, Ava E. Lias-Booker, Governor Tommy G. Thompson and CEO of Duke Realty Corporation,Richard A. Weiss to our Board. Mr. Connor was appointed as an independentWe also bid a fond farewell to Christine N. Garvey and David B. Henry, who will retire at this year’s Annual Meeting pursuant to our director in March 2023. He brings significant commercialterm limit policy. We thank them for their years of dedicated leadership and service.
Merger with Physicians Realty Trust
The all-stock business combination with Physicians Realty Trust created a combined company with total assets of approximately $21 billion. The combined company is expected to be the leading real estate platform dedicated to healthcare discovery and investment experience,delivery, showcasing a portfolio of over 50 million square feet, including 40 million square feet of outpatient medical properties concentrated in high-growth markets such as Dallas, Houston, Nashville, Phoenix and his expertise complementsDenver. The combined company will benefit from extensive relationships with the skillsnation’s leading health systems.
Commitment to Risk Management and depthOversight
The Board is committed to robust risk oversight of our Board.
Strategic Focus
Over the last several years,business, among other things. In 2023, the Board conducted its annual enterprise risk management assessment to identify and prioritize risks throughout the organization. As part of that review, we have fully transformedengaged a third-party expert to review specific cybersecurity risks throughout our portfolio to focus on areas where we have a competitive advantage and dramatically improved our balance sheet. As a result of these efforts, Healthpeak is uniquely positioned to createidentify and capture value.implement proactive mitigation measures.
2022 In Review
During 2022 in a seamless leadership succession, we appointed Scott M. Brinker as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Adam G. Mabry as our Chief Investment Officer and Scott R. Bohn as our Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of Life Science. Also in 2022, we continued to focus on operational excellence and produced strong internal growth, tenant retention, rent collections and leasing activity. Corporate Responsibility
We also managed our balance sheet and liquidity and positioned our Company to act quickly as opportunities arise.
ESG Leadership
Environmental,undertake environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives are a critical component of our corporate responsibility strategy.
We continually undertake sustainability(“ESG”) initiatives that seek to increase long-term stakeholder value.value and underscore our commitment to corporate responsibility. In 2022,2023, we conducted a comprehensive review of our sustainability strategy and developed a 10-year strategic roadmap, focusing on our decarbonization pathway and corporate- and asset-level initiatives that we believe will yield a return on investment, optimize building performance, reduce operating costs, generate cost savings and promote energy efficiency. We also published our 11th 12th annual ESG Report, which was prepared in accordance with leading ESG reporting frameworks, including the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, Global Reporting Initiative and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We allocated the net proceeds from two green bonds to the purchase or development of LEED Gold Certified Life Science properties in furtherance of our commitment to own sustainable properties, minimize our carbon footprint and reduce operating costs. Throughout 2022,2023, we received numerous awards for our sustainability efforts, including being named by Newsweek to America’s Most Responsible Companies list for the fifth consecutive year and the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) Green Star Rating for the 11th 12th consecutive year.
We continue to focus on human capital management, with a particular emphasis on diversity, equity and inclusion, and employee engagement, satisfaction and retention. We made further progress toward our commitment to promote and enhance racial diversity, education and awareness within our Company and throughout our communities. We also achieved employee satisfaction scores that are well above industry averages through our annual employee engagement survey, reflecting the culmination of a multiyear strategy to maximize employee engagement and development. We also continued our long-standing commitment to partnering with and supporting charitable organizations.
4 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Letter from Our Board of Directors
As a leader among REITs in corporate governance matters, we prioritized transparent disclosure and robust governance practices. In 2023, our disclosure practices were recognized by IR Magazine with the Corporate Governance Award for Central to
Looking Ahead We continue to concentrate our operating and investment strategies where we have a competitive advantage, which we believe is key to generating sustainable stockholder value. We are excited about Healthpeak’s market position and believe we are well positioned for long-term growth. Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely, The Board of Directors |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Scott M. Brinker President and Chief Executive Officer, Director | Katherine M. Sandstrom Independent Chair of the Board | John T. Thomas Vice Chair of the Board | |||||
Brian G. Cartwright Independent Director | James B. Connor Independent Director | Christine N. Garvey Independent Director | |||||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. Independent Director | David B. Henry Independent Director | Pamela J. Kessler Independent Director | |||||
Sara G. Lewis Independent Director | Ava E. Lias-Booker Independent Director | Governor Tommy G. Thompson Independent Director | |||||
Richard A. Weiss Independent Director |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 5 |
PROPOSALS 01 | |||||
Election of Our Board recommends a vote FOR each of the
Our Board believes that the
All of our director nominees, other than Mr. Brinker, our President and CEO, and Mr. Thomas, our Vice Chair of the Board and former President and CEO of Physicians Realty Trust, are independent.
All of our director nominees are highly successful professionals with relevant skills and experience. | FOR See
12–25
| ||||
02 | Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of Our Board recommends a vote FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of our
2023 executive compensation reflects independent oversight by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) with advice from independent consultants.
Our executive compensation program aligns with our corporate strategy and helps drive long-term value for stockholders.
Pay-for-performance alignment is reflected in our short-term incentive plan (“STIP”) results, which paid out above the target level as a result of achieving certain | FOR See
41–72
| |||
|
|
6 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Proxy Summary
Our Board of Directors solicits your proxy for the Annual Meeting. This summary provides an overview of information contained in this proxy statement and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before voting. We encourage you to review the entire proxy statement before casting your vote. | ||
|
| ||||
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Our Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for
Deloitte’s institutional knowledge of our business and control framework enables effective and efficient audits.
The Audit Committee has considered the independence, performance and qualifications of Deloitte in connection with this proposal and has determined that the retention of Deloitte continues to be in the best interests of Healthpeak and its stockholders. | FOR See
76–78
|
7 |
Proxy Summary
2022 Business Highlights
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
Portfolio Positioned for Growth
Through all economic cycles, our business is driven by two fundamentals — the aging population and the desire for improved health. Demand for our real estate led to an estimated 17 million visits to our Medical Office buildings last year for outpatient healthcare. Our Life Science tenants are producing life-changing therapeutics for cancer, heart disease and sickle cell disease, among many other diseases. With the ongoing push to outpatient medical care, and advances in personalized medicine and drug discovery, our portfolio is well positioned for growth.
PORTFOLIO INCOME(1)
(for the year ended December 31, 2022)
Proxy Summary
Our Director Nominees
Our Board has a breadth of experience and reflects a diversity of perspectives and backgrounds. We believe the range of skills and tenures of our director nominees creates a balance between institutional knowledge and new viewpoints.
GENDER | RACIAL | AGE | TENURE | ||
DIVERSITY INFORMATION | COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | ||||||||
DIRECTOR NOMINEES | AGE | DIRECTOR SINCE | GENDER | RACE / ETHNICITY | AUDIT | COMPENSATION | GOVERNANCE | INVESTMENT AND FINANCE | |
Scott M. Brinker President and Chief Executive Officer, | 46 | 2022 | Male | White | |||||
Brian G. Cartwright INDEPENDENT Chairman of the Board, | 75 | 2013 | Male | White | |||||
Katherine M. Sandstrom INDEPENDENT Vice Chair of the Board, | 54 | 2018 | Female | White | |||||
James B. Connor INDEPENDENT Former Chairman and CEO, | 64 | 2023 | Male | White | |||||
Christine N. Garvey INDEPENDENT Former Global Head of Corporate Real Estate Services, Deutsche Bank AG | 77 | 2007 | Female | Hispanic/ Latina | |||||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. INDEPENDENT Managing Director, PHICAS Investors; | 53 | 2018 | Male | White | |||||
David B. Henry INDEPENDENT Former Vice Chairman and CEO, | 74 | 2004 | Male | White | |||||
Sara G. Lewis INDEPENDENT Founder and CEO, | 55 | 2019 | Female | White | |||||
Chair | Member | ||||||||
We do not currently have any directors who self-identify as LGBTQ+.
For an overview of our Directors’ core skills and experience, please see the skills matrix on page 14.
We do not currently have any directors who self-identify as LGBTQ+. | |||
For an overview of all our directors’ core skills and experience, see the skills matrix on page 13. |
DIRECTOR NOMINEES | AGE | DIRECTOR SINCE | GENDER | RACE / ETHINICITY | |||||
Scott M. Brinker President and Chief Executive Officer, Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | 47 | 2022 | Male | White | |||||
Katherine M. Sandstrom INDEPENDENT Chair of the Board, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.; Former Senior Managing Director, Heitman LLC | 55 | 2018 | Female | White | |||||
John T. Thomas Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Physicians Realty Trust | 57 | 2024 | Male | White | |||||
Brian G. Cartwright INDEPENDENT Former General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission | 76 | 2013 | Male | White | |||||
James B. Connor INDEPENDENT Former Chairman and CEO, Duke Realty Corporation | 65 | 2023 | Male | White | |||||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. INDEPENDENT Managing Director, PHICAS Investors; Former President, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. | 54 | 2018 | Male | White | |||||
Pamela J. Kessler INDEPENDENT Co-President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, LTC Properties, Inc. | 58 | 2024 | Female | White | * | ||||
Sara G. Lewis INDEPENDENT Founder and CEO, Lewis Corporate Advisors, LLC | 56 | 2019 | Female | White | |||||
Ava E. Lias Booker INDEPENDENT Partner, McGuireWoods LLP | 63 | 2024 | Female | African American or Black | * | ||||
Governor Tommy G. Thompson INDEPENDENT Former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services | 82 | 2024 | Male | White | * | ||||
Richard A. Weiss INDEPENDENT Former Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP | 77 | 2024 | Male | White | * | ||||
Chair Member |
* | Following the Annual Meeting and subject to their election by stockholders, Ms. Kessler will serve on the Audit Committee, Ms. Lias-Booker will serve on the Governance Committee, and Governor Thompson and Mr. Weiss will serve on the Investment and Finance Committee, with Governor Thompson serving as Chair of that committee. |
8 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Proxy Summary
Compensation Highlights
2022
We have an established executive compensation program that we believe is competitive and that has been developed in response to feedback from our stockholders through ongoing investor outreach as well asand in alignment with best practices. In 2022,2023, we compensated our named executive officers (“NEOs”) using the following three elements of pay:
ELEMENT | FORM | 2023 METRICS AND WEIGHTING | |||||
01 | Base Salary | Fixed Cash | Base level of competitive cash to attract and retain executive talent | ||||
02 | Annual Incentive Award (STIP) | Performance- Based Cash | 55% | Pre-established objective financial performance metrics to align compensation with strategic goals • 35% – Normalized FFO per share • 20% – Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre | |||
15% | ESG performance metrics to align compensation with corporate responsibility strategy | ||||||
30% | Individual performance to reward individual initiative and achievement | ||||||
03 | Long-Term Incentive Award (LTIP) | Performance- Based Awards | 60% | 3-year cliff vesting based on TSR performance relative to the following indices, subject to a 1-year post-vesting holding period (other than the settlement of shares in connection with applicable tax withholding): • Selected healthcare REIT peers (24% of overall award) • MSCI US REIT Index (18% of overall award) • FTSE Nareit Equity Office Index (18% of overall award) | |||
Time-Based Awards | 40% | 3-year annual vesting, subject to a pre-established Normalized FFO per share performance hurdle and 1-year post-vesting holding period (other than the settlement of shares in connection with applicable tax withholding) |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 9 |
Incentive Award (STIP) |
| ||||||
Incentive Award (LTIP) |
| ||||||
2022 Performance-Based Payouts
We delivered solid financial, operational and stock price performance in 2022, generally leading to above-target payouts based on our pre-established performance metrics.
2022 STIP (ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE AWARD) | 2020-2022 LTIP (3-YEAR RELATIVE TSR-BASED EQUITY AWARD) | |||||||||||||||||
NORMALIZED FFO PER SHARE(1) | NET DEBT TO ADJUSTED EBITDAre(1) | ESG PERFORMANCE METRIC | FTSE NAREIT HEALTH CARE INDEX | S&P 500 REIT INDEX | ||||||||||||||
TARGET | RESULT | TARGET | RESULT | TARGET | RESULT | TARGET | RESULT | TARGET | RESULT | |||||||||
$1.696 | $1.725 | 5.50x | 5.34x | 12 points | 20 points | 50th percentile | 62nd percentile | 50th percentile | 25th percentile | |||||||||
148.3% | 116% | 150% | 138.7% | 50% | ||||||||||||||
144% (Total Blended) | 109% (Total Blended) | |||||||||||||||||
Payout as percentage of target based on outperformance compared to pre-established goals | Payout as percentage of target based on performance compared to pre-established goals |
Proxy Summary
ESGCorporate Responsibility Highlights
We believe that environmental, social and governance, or ESG initiatives areserve a vital part of value creation and corporate responsibility. For additional information, please read our annual ESG Report or visit our website at healthpeak.com/esg.
|
We strive to advance our building performance, efficiency, resilience and sustainability by identifying projects that minimize environmental impacts, deliver an acceptable return on investment and reduce operating costs. In 2022,2023, we published our 11th 12th annual ESG Report, aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Based Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”), Global Reporting Initiatives and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals reporting frameworks. In 2022,2023, we reported on the progress of our long-term environmental goals for greenhouse gas emissions (“GHG”), energy, water, waste and recycling with respect to properties in our operational boundary (Scopes 1 & 2). The recognitions reflected below include those for legacy Healthpeak and Physicians Realty Trust.
GOALS | GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION (SCIENCE-BASED TARGETS) (BY 2033)(1) | ENERGY SAVINGS (BY 2030)(2) | WATER SAVINGS (BY 2030)(2) | WASTE (LANDFILL) DIVERSION (BY 2030)(2) | RECYCLING INCREASE (BY 2030)(2) | |||||
37.5% Scopes 1 & 2 | 15% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
PROGRESS(3) | 11.8% Year 3 of 15 | 0.7% Year 1 of 10 | 2.7% Year 1 of 10 | — Year 1 of 10 | 0.3% Year 1 of 10 |
Recognitions GRESB Green Star Rating (2011–2023) CDP Leadership Band (2012–2023) DJSI N. America Index Constituent (2012–2023) and World Index (4 times) S&P Global Sustainability Yearbook (2016–2023) Green Lease Leader – Platinum Nareit Leader in the Light – 10-Time Award Recipient FTSE4Good Index Series (2012–2023) | ||||
GOALS | GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION | ENERGY | WATER | WASTE | RECYCLING | |||||
37.5% Scopes 1 & 2 | 15% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||||||
PROGRESS(3) | 16.1% achieved | 2.7% achieved | 3.1% achieved | — | 4.2% achieved |
(1) | Relative to 2018 baseline. Validated by the Science-Based Targets initiative. |
(2) | Relative to 2021 baseline. |
(3) | As reported in |
LEED Certified Space | |||||||||||
6.5 Million Sq. Ft. | 65 Certifications in 2022 | ||||||||||
(1) Cumulative for the combined company as of | We were named an ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year for the |
Proxy Summary
10 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
|
| ||||||
GENDER DIVERSITY 56% Female Workforce(1) | |||||||
RACIAL/ETHNIC DIVERSITY 31% Racially/Ethnically Diverse Workforce(1) | Recognitions
|
|
Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index Constituent (2019-2022) • Great Place to Work Certified • Orange County Business Journal Best Places to Work (2020, 2022 & • The Tennessean Top Workplace • Fortune Best Places to Work in Real Estate • Modern Healthcare Best Places to Work (3 Times) | ||||||
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Legacy Healthpeak and Physicians Realty Trust partnered with over 125 community or charitable organizations (in the aggregate) in 2023 | TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT Legacy Healthpeak completed company-wide belonging and inclusion training in 2023 with 100% participation | |||||
(1) As of March 8, 2024. |
We believe we are a stronger organization when our workforce represents a diversity of ideas and experiences. We value and embrace diversity in our employee recruiting, hiring and development practices, To view our most recently filed EEO-1 Report, |
Governance Highlights | |
All director nominees, other than
|
Codes of Conduct for directors, employees and vendors
Policy on director time commitments and overboarding aligned with key stakeholder policies and best practices
Stockholder proxy access rights reflecting market standard terms |
• Newsweek America’s Most Responsible Companies List (2019–
ISS Governance QualityScore – • ISS ESG Corporate Rating – Prime • MSCI Rating – AA-
|
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | |
FOR | Our Board recommends a vote FOReach of the | |
Based on the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”), our Board has nominated our current eight directorseleven director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting to serve until the 20242025 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. All of the nominees are current directors of the Company who were previously elected to the Board by our stockholders, with the exceptions ofother than Messrs. BrinkerThomas and Connor,Weiss, Governor Thompson and Mses. Kessler and Lias-Booker, who were appointed to our Board in October 2022following the business combination with Physicians Realty Trust on March 1, 2024. Our remaining two current directors, Ms. Garvey and March 2023, respectively.Mr. Henry, will retire at this year’s Annual Meeting pursuant to our director term limit policy and are not standing for election at the Annual Meeting. Each director nominee has agreed to be named in this proxy statement and to serve, if elected.
We have no reason to believe that any of our nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. However, if any nominee is unable or unwilling for good cause to serve, the proxy holders may vote their shares for a substitute nominee or for the balance of our Board, leaving a vacancy, unless our Board chooses to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.
MAJORITY VOTING AND DIRECTOR RESIGNATION POLICY
Consistent with corporate governance best practices, our majority voting standard for director elections requires that a director nominee in an uncontested election receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to his or her election at the Annual Meeting (that is, the number of votes cast FOR the nominee must exceed the number of votes cast AGAINST the nominee) to be elected to our Board. Our Board believes that the majority vote standard in uncontested elections strengthens the director nomination process and enhances director accountability.
We also have a director resignation policy in our Bylaws, which requires any nominee who fails to receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election to promptly submit his or her resignation from the Board. The Governance Committee would then consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our Board on whether to accept it or whether other action should be taken. Our Board would then act on the resignation, taking into account the Committee’s recommendation, and would publicly disclose its decision, along with the rationale for such decision, within 90 days of certification of the election results. We believe this process provides critical accountability to stockholders.
| HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Director Qualifications, Skills and Experience
Our Governance Committee has determined that each of our director nominees possesses the qualifications, skills and experience to effectively oversee the Company’s long-term business strategy. The matrix below indicates the director nominees who possess each qualification, skill or experience.
Our Board believes that all directors should possess certain core qualities that ensure their fitness to lead the Company. We believe that each of our directors possesses the following core attributes:
Strategic Oversight experience is essential to guiding our long-term business | Governance supports our goals of strong Board and management accountability and alignment with stockholders’ | Leadership experience is important for driving positive change and developing leadership qualities in others. | Integrity and Ethics are paramount for ensuring the sound reputation and operation of the Company. |
In addition to the core competencies noted above, our Board believes that the Company will be best served by directors with a wide array of talents and perspectives to drive innovation, promote critical thinking and enhance discussion. Each of the following additional qualifications meaningfully adds to our Board’s depth.
Risk Oversight/Management Experience is critical to our Board’s role in overseeing the risks facing the Company. | |||||||||||||||
Investment Expertiseis important in evaluating our assets and portfolio as a whole. | |||||||||||||||
Financial Expertise and/or Literacy is valuable in understanding and overseeing our financial reporting and internal controls. | |||||||||||||||
Human Capital Management Experience is valuable in helping us attract, motivate and retain high-performing employees. | |||||||||||||||
Public Company Board Experience provides essential comparison points for operations and governance. | |||||||||||||||
Corporate Responsibility Experience helps support the Board’s oversight of the Company’s long-term climate, human capital and corporate governance strategy and initiatives. | |||||||||||||||
REIT/Real Estate Experience is helpful for understanding the Company’s strengths and challenges specific to the real estate investment trust and real estate industries. | |||||||||||||||
Legal/Government/Regulatory Experienceis relevant for ensuring oversight of management’s compliance with SEC, New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and other regulatory requirements. | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare Industry Experience is important for understanding the Company’s strengths and challenges specific to the healthcare industry. | |||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity Oversight Experience contributes to the Board’s understanding and oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity and information technology risks. | |||||||||||||||
Public Company Executive Experience supports our management team through relevant advice and leadership. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
Director Nominees
Scott M. Brinker President and Director Age: 47 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2022 COMMITTEES: OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
|
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
|
QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Brinker brings to our Board extensive experience in the healthcare REIT industry gained from his leadership roles at Healthpeak and another publicly traded REIT. His knowledge of the Company’s operations and strategy as our President and Chief Executive Officer and former role as Chief Investment Officer, as well as his extensive and diverse experience in investments, business development, underwriting, asset management, capital markets, investor relations, corporate finance, and industry-wide relationships and perspective, all contribute to leading our Company and executing our strategy. | ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy • Human Capital Management | • Public Company Board Experience • Corporate Responsibility • REIT/Real Estate • Legal/Government/Regulatory | • Healthcare Industry • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | ||||
Katherine M. Sandstrom Independent Chair of the Board Age: 55 DIRECTOR SINCE: COMMITTEES: OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
• EastGroup Properties, Inc. (NYSE: EGP) • Urban Edge Properties (NYSE: UE) | PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Advisor to Heitman LLC from July 2018 to March 2019. • Senior Managing Director and global head of Heitman LLC’s Public Real Estate Securities business from 2013 to 2018. • Several senior leadership positions at Heitman LLC across multiple facets of the institutional real estate investment industry. • Member of Global Management Committee, the Board of Managers and the Allocation Committee while at Heitman LLC. • Certified Public Accountant. | ||||
QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Sandstrom brings to our Board more than 20 years of real estate finance and investment experience. She has extensive background overseeing buy-side investment teams for REIT securities, strategies and assets. Ms. Sandstrom’s background as a senior executive at Heitman LLC, as well as her tenure as Vice Chair of our Board from April 2022 until April 2023, are beneficial in her role as the Chair of our Board and Chair of the Governance Committee. | |||||
• Investment Expertise • Financial Expertise and/or | • Human Capital Management • |
• REIT/Real Estate | |||
14 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
John T. Thomas Vice Chair of the Board Age: 57 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2024 COMMITTEES: NONE OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS: • None | PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • President, Chief Executive Officer, and Trustee of Physicians Realty Trust (formerly NYSE: DOC), from 2013 until its merger with our Company in 2024. • Executive Vice President – Medical Facilities of Welltower Inc. (NYSE: WELL, formerly Health Care REIT Inc.), from 2009 to 2012. • President, Chief Development Officer and Business Counsel of Cirrus Health, from 2005 to 2008. • Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Baylor Health Care System, from 2000 to 2005. • General Counsel and Secretary of the St. Louis division of the Sisters of Mercy Health System, from 1997 to 2000. • Tax Attorney at Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal (now Dentons), from 1995 to 1997, where he was elected Partner in 1997; at Shook, Hardy & Bacon from 1992 to 1995; and at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCoy from 1990 to 1992. • Member of the Boards of Trustees of the Jacksonville State University Foundation and the Auburn University Real Estate Foundation. • Former Director at Education Realty Trust, Inc. (formerly NYSE: EDR). | ||||
QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Thomas brings to our Board extensive background, skills and experience in the healthcare real estate industry. As former President and Chief Executive Officer of Physicians Realty Trust and a former executive at other companies in the healthcare and real estate industries, he is knowledgeable on various aspects of the outpatient medical business and has considerable executive experience in the real estate industry. Mr. Thomas also has experience in legal and government affairs and health care policy from his time as General Counsel of health systems, as co-founder and chairman of a national coalition to reform medical malpractice laws through federal legislation, and testifying before Congressional committees. | |||||
• Risk Oversight/Management • Investment Expertise • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy • Human Capital Management | • Public Company Board
| • Healthcare Industry • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | |||
Brian G. Cartwright Independent Director Age: 76 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2013 COMMITTEES: OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC • None | PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE •Senior Advisor (inactive) at Patomak Global Partners, LLC, a regulatory consulting firm, since 2012.
•Senior Advisor at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP from 2009 to 2011. Partner, serving in various senior management positions, including as a member of its Executive Committee, from 1988 to 2005.
|
QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Cartwright brings to our Board unparalleled and distinguished corporate governance, regulatory and legal experience, having previously served as general counsel of the SEC, which provides valuable insight in his role as a member of the | ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | • Human Capital Management • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility | • Legal/Government/Regulatory • Healthcare Industry | ||||
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
|
|
| ||||||
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 15 |
James B. Independent Director Age: 65 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2023 COMMITTEES: OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC • EPR Properties • Prologis, Inc. |
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
|
QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Connor brings to our Board business administration, capital markets, corporate development, corporate governance, human capital, investor relations, marketing, public company and sustainability expertise gained from his leadership roles at another publicly traded REIT for more than 20 years, most recently as its chairman of the board and chief executive officer, and more than 15 years of additional experience in commercial real estate. His extensive background as a REIT chief executive provides valuable insight in his role as a member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. | ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | • Human Capital Management • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility | • REIT/Real Estate • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | ||||
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
R. Kent Independent Director Age: 54 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 COMMITTEES: |
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY
|
| ||||||
|
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
| ||||
|
Mr. Griffin brings to our Board extensive real estate and corporate finance experience gained from his leadership roles, currently at PHICAS as a managing director and previously as the president, chief operating officer and chief financial officer of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. Mr. Griffin leverages his experience as an auditor at a major public accounting firm in his role as Chair of the Audit Committee, as well as his investment banking and corporate finance experience in his role as a member of the Investment Committee. | ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | • Human Capital Management • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility • REIT/Real Estate | • Legal/Government/Regulatory • Healthcare Industry • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | ||||
16 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
Back to Contents |
Pamela J. Kessler Independent Director Age: 58 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2024
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC • None |
• Senior
|
QUALIFICATIONS
| ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | • Human Capital Management • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility • REIT/Real Estate | • Legal/Government/Regulatory • Healthcare Industry • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | ||||
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
Back to Contents |
Sara G. Lewis Independent Director Age: 56 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2019 COMMITTEES:
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS: • Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. (NYSE: FCX) • Weyerhaeuser Company (NYSE: WY) |
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
| ||||
|
Ms. Lewis brings to our Board | ||||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management | • Investment Expertise | • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy • Human Capital | • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility • REIT/Real Estate • Legal/Government/Regulatory | • Healthcare Industry • Cybersecurity Oversight • Public Company Executive | ||||
18 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Ava E. Lias-Booker Independent Director Age: 63 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2024 COMMITTEES: GOVERNANCE OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC • None | PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Partner at McGuireWoods LLP, since 2004, and served in a variety of leadership roles, including as chair of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. • Partner at Saul Ewing LLP, from 2001 to 2004. • Partner at Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander LLP, from 1995 to 2001. • Partner at Saul Ewing LLP (formerly Weinberg & Green LLC), from 1994 to 1995. • Former Trustee at Physicians Realty Trust (formerly NYSE: DOC), from 2022 until its merger with our Company in 2024. • Member of the Board of Directors of the University of Maryland Saint Joseph's Medical Center; gubernatorial appointee to the University of Maryland Medical System Board of Directors; and member of the Boards of Visitors of Duke University School of Law (honorary) and the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (emeritus). | |||||
QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Lias-Booker brings to our Board extensive experience in legal, governance and regulatory compliance matters, as well as leadership on diversity, inclusion and human capital management issues. Her prior experience serving on the board of trustees of Physicians Realty Trust provided her with expertise in risk oversight, investments, financial literacy and public company board matters. | ||||||
• Risk Oversight/Management • Investment Expertise • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | •Human Capital Management | |||||
•Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility | • Legal/Government/Regulatory | |||||
Governor Tommy G. Thompson Independent Director Age: 82 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2024 COMMITTEES: INVESTMENT OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC • United Therapeutics Corporation (Nasdaq: UTHR) • TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (Nasdaq: TXMD) | PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • President of the University of Wisconsin System, from 2020 to 2022. • U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, from 2001 to 2005. • Governor of State of Wisconsin, from 1987 to 2001. • Senior Advisor at Deloitte & Touche USA LLP, from 2005 to 2009. • Partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, from 2005 to 2012. • President of Logistics Health, Inc., from 2005 to 2011, and Chairman of the Board of Trustees from 2007 to 2011. • Former Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Physicians Realty Trust (formerly NYSE: DOC), from 2013 until its merger with our Company in 2024. • Former Director at Scilex Holding Company (Nasdaq: SCLX), from 2022 to 2023; Tyme Technologies, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: TYME), from 2018 to 2020; and previously served as a director on several other public company boards, including C.R. Bard, Inc. (formerly NYSE: BCR); Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (now Plus Therapeutics, Nasdaq: PSTV); Cancer Genetics, Inc. (now Vyant Bio, Inc., formerly Nasdaq: VYNT); Centene Corporation (NYSE: CNC); and CareView Communications, Inc. | ||||
QUALIFICATIONS Governor Thompson brings to our Board decades of experience and leadership in government and the evolving healthcare industry, including unique experience with physicians, healthcare decision makers and business executives regarding healthcare policy and improvements within the industry. His other service on public company boards in the healthcare real estate and biopharma industries makes him uniquely situated to serve on our Board with our focus on healthcare discovery and delivery, including the financial, investment and risk oversight issues specific to our industry and sector. | |||||
• Risk Oversight/Management • Investment Expertise • Financial Expertise and/or Literacy | • Human Capital Management • Public Company Board • Corporate Responsibility • REIT/Real Estate | • Legal/Government/Regulatory • Healthcare Industry | |||
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 19 |
Table of
20 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Our Board believes that improving its effectiveness is an ongoing process that requires thoughtful planning, evaluation, recruitment and orderly refreshment. This ongoing process is outlined below. | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 |
Director Selection | Onboarding and Education | Board Self-Evaluation | Board Composition and Refreshment |
|
|
|
|
01 | ||
The Governance Committee considers a variety of factors when reviewing potential nominees for our Board, including:
Personal and professional integrity, ethics and values; | |
Experience in | |
Experience with relevant legal, regulatory and policy concerns; | |
Experience as a board member of other public | |
The ability and willingness to commit adequate time to our Board and its committees; | |
Experience in corporate management and executive leadership, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company; |
Whether the individual’s skills and personality will complement and supplement those of the other members (and potential members) of our Board and are likely to be conducive to building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of the Company; | |
Expertise in an area of Healthpeak’s operations, such as financing strategy, risk management or human capital management; | |
Practical and mature business judgment; | |
• | Personal and professional time commitments and capacity, ability and willingness to govern; and |
Independence from management and lack of relationships with our other directors and employees. | |
DIVERSITY | ||
The Governance Committee also considers diversity in gender, race, age, ethnicity, national origin and professional and personal experience when reviewing potential director nominees, and strives to create diversity in perspectives on our Board as a whole, when identifying and selecting nominees. On an annual basis, as part of our Board’s self-evaluation, our Board assesses whether its diversity, which it views as a critical component to its effectiveness, is appropriate. | ||
The Governance Committee considers potential director nominees recommended by various sources, including Board members, stockholders and senior management. The Committee will consider director candidates properly recommended by stockholders in the same manner as recommendations received from other sources. For a description of the process for stockholders to recommend or nominate directors, see “Other Matters—20242025 Stockholder Proposals, Director Nominations and Director Candidate Recommendations.”
The
If the Board, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, determines it is appropriate to consider new director candidates to refresh the Board or fill any Board vacancies, the Chair of the Governance Committee, or a member designated by the Chair, is responsible for overseeing the search and interview process. The Committee will provide progress updates to our Board and will meet to consider and recommend final director candidates to the entire Board. Our Board then determines, taking into account the recommendation of the Committee, which candidates to appoint to our Board or nominate for election by our stockholders.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
Pursuant to our director term limit policy, Ms. Garvey and Mr. Henry will retire from our Board at the 2024 Annual Meeting. In 2022, in anticipation of these retirements, the Governance Committee engaged an independent director search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating potential director candidates, including establishing director nominee criteria and evaluating the candidates’ credentials. As a result of this engagement, the Committee identified Mr. Connor as a director candidate, and the Board appointed Mr. Connor in March 2023. In addition, the Board determined to appoint five directors from Physicians Realty Trust in connection with our business combination – Messrs. Thomas and Weiss, Governor Thompson and Mses. Kessler and Lias-Booker. These five directors were selected based on their familiarity with Physicians Realty Trust and experience in healthcare, real estate, investment, governance and risk management, among other attributes our Board determined are important for the combined company.
Our Board determined that all non-employee director nomineeshas assessed whether the members of our Board are independent according to NYSE listing standards. For a director to be considered independent under NYSE rules, our Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
us), with certain types of relationships automatically disqualifying the director as independent. Our Board annually evaluates the independence of each non-employee director by considering any matters that could affect the director’s ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. This evaluation includes any transactions or relationships between the director, members of his or her family and organizations with which that director or family members have an affiliation, on the one hand, and us, our subsidiaries and management, on the other hand.
Based upon its most recent review, our Board affirmatively determined that each of Mses. Garvey, Kessler, Lewis, Lias-Booker and Sandstrom, and Messrs. Cartwright, Connor, Griffin, Henry and HenryWeiss and Governor Thompson is independent under the rules of the NYSE. OurAs noted above, each of Ms. Garvey and Mr. Henry will retire from our Board also affirmatively determined that Ms. Lydia Kennard was independent forat the portion of 2022 during which she served as a director.Annual Meeting and are not director nominees. We refer to directors for whom we have affirmatively determined independence under NYSE rules as “Independent Directors.” Our only non-independent director isdirectors are Mr. Brinker, our President and CEO, Scott Brinker.and Mr. Thomas, former President and CEO of Physicians Realty Trust and our current employee.
When evaluating potential director nominees, our Board considers ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters, including in light of the nominee’s other positions, service on other public company boards and/or board leadership positions. We expect our directors to attend regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of our Board, including the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as make every effort to attend all other scheduled meetings of the Board and all other meetings of committees of which they are members. Directors are expected to be sufficiently familiar with our business and the risks and competition we face to facilitate active and effective participation in the deliberations of the Board and of each committee on which he or she serves.
Our Board values the experience directors bring from other boards on which they serve, but recognizes that those boards may also present demands on a director’s time and availability. Accordingly, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors may not serve on the board of directors of more than four other public companies, and our President and CEO and any director serving as a chief executive officer or other executive officer of another public company may not serve on the board of directors of more than two other public companies. Our Board has determined that this policy on director time commitments is appropriate based on a review of institutional investor and proxy advisory firm guidelines, as well as peer trends and best practices. Our Board, with oversight from the Governance Committee, reviews the policy and each director’s compliance on an annual basis. All director nominees currently comply with the Company’s policy on director time commitments.
22 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Our Bylaws permit a stockholder, or group of up to 25 stockholders, owning at least 3% of our outstanding common stock continuously for three years to nominate up to the greater of two directors or a number of directors constituting up to 20% of our Board for inclusion in our proxy materials for an annual meeting of stockholders, subject to complying with the requirements contained in our Bylaws. For more information on using proxy access to nominate directors, see “Other Matters—20242025 Stockholder Proposals, Director Nominations and Director Candidate Recommendations.”
25 | 3% | 3 | 20% | |||
Up to a group of 25 stockholders | Owning at least 3% of our shares | Continuously for 3 years | May nominate the greater of two nominees or 20% of our Board |
|
|
|
|
02 | ||
Onboarding and orientation: When a director joins our Board, senior management | |
Deep dives and meaningful engagement: Throughout the year, our management team, as well as outside advisors, present to the Board on substantive topics that affect our business and relate to our strategy. During our regular quarterly Board meetings, our directors meet with members of management, including emerging leaders, | |
Educational memberships and events: We encourage directors to attend director education programs relating to board responsibilities, corporate governance and/or substantive matters relevant to the Company. We provide a list of upcoming educational programs and conferences to our directors every quarter and reimburse | |
Governance policymaking: Certain of our directors are actively involved in shaping policy around corporate governance. For example, Ms. Lewis, our Compensation Committee Chair and a member of our Governance Committee, is a member of the Leadership Board, Corporate Governance Working Group and ESG Working Group of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
03 | ||
Our Board conducts an annual self-assessment aimed at enhancing its effectiveness. Our directors review areas where they feel our Board functions effectively and, importantly, areas where our Board believes there are opportunities for improvement, including through ongoing and orderly Board refreshment.
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Proposal 01: Election of Directors
04 | ||
The Governance Committee periodically assesses our directors’ skills, experience and perspectives in the context of the Board’s overall composition, as well as the current and future needs of the Company and the Board. Among other matters, the Committee considers the results of its annual self-assessments for the Board and its committees when regularly reviewing Board leadership and committee composition.
In considering Board composition and leadership, the Board balances the benefits derived from continuity and experience, as well as the benefits derived from fresh viewpoints and perspectives. By periodically rotating committee composition, our directors gain a comprehensive understanding of different aspects of our business. Considering our Company’s portfolio transformation, strategic direction and enhanced focus on corporate governance, human capital management and ESG,corporate responsibility, as well as director refreshment and scheduled retirements under our director term limit policy, our Board conducted a comprehensive review of its composition and structure and made the following updates in 2022:2023:
Ms. Sandstrom was appointed as our independent | |
• | Mr. Cartwright joined the Compensation Committee, bringing his human capital management and |
• | Mr. Connor was appointed |
Director Term Limit Policy
Director Retirement Policy
Our Board believes that our directors develop an understanding of the Company and an ability to work effectively as a group over time. Accordingly, our Board places value on year-over-year continuity. At the same time, the Board believes that director refreshment is important to help ensure that Board composition is aligned with the needs of the Company as our business evolves. The Board has strategically reviewed ourreviews director retirement policy overrefreshment from time as part of its ongoing commitment to refreshment. As a result of this review, our Boardtime and has adopted a 15-year director term limit policy in 2020 in place of its prior age 75 retirement policy.
Our 15-year term limit policy allows us to continue orderly Board refreshment while allowing for a cohesive Board and diversity of skills, experiences and tenures. | |
Under the 15-year term limit policy, directors will not be nominated for election or appointed to the Board at any annual meeting of stockholders following the calendar year in which they have attained 15 years of service on the Board. On the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the Board, by majority vote and on an annual basis, may waive the term limit if the Board deems such waiver to be in the best interests of the Company. | |
54% | |
of Board Refreshed Since 2022 | |
Our current average director tenure is 7 years, and our current median director tenure is 5 years.
|
|
|
Since 2018 | Average | Median Director Nominee Tenure |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
Corporate Governance
Board and Stockholder Meeting Attendance
Our Board’s primary responsibility is to oversee the long-term health and success of our business on behalf of stockholders. In order to effectively carry out that duty to stockholders, our Board commits a substantial amount of time and attention throughout the year to the most significant aspects of our business. Directors are expected to, and do, ask challenging questions of management.
Our policy is that directors should make every effort to attend all meetings of our Board and the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as all meetings of Board committees for which they are members. Our directors are committed to their responsibilities and are highly engaged, as demonstrated by their average high attendance at 100%in excess of 90% of all 2023 Board and committee meetings. The Board meeting schedule in 2023 was more demanding due to numerous meetings held in connection with the Physicians Realty Trust merger. No director attended less than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of our Board and the committees on which the director served in 2022.2023. When directors were not able to attend a Board meeting due to a scheduling conflict, they separately met with our Board Chair or President and CEO to discuss the meeting topic(s). All of our then-serving directors attended the 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders.
We value the experience our directors bring from other boards on which they serve, but we also recognize that those boards may present demands on a director’s time and availability. UnderAs discussed on page 22, all director nominees satisfy our overboarding policy set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are reviewed by the Governance Committee annually, directors may not serve on the board of directors of more than four other public companies, and our President and CEO may not serve on the board of directors of more than two other public companies.director time commitments.
Board Effectiveness: Underscored by Engagement | ||||
100% | 100% | 9 | 100% | 13 |
2022 Annual Meeting Attendance by Directors | Board Meeting Attendance in 2022 | Total Board Meetings in 2022 | Committee Meeting Attendance in 2022 | Total Committee Meetings in 2022 |
Board Effectiveness: Underscored by Engagement |
100% |
2023 Annual Meeting Attendance by Directors |
93% |
Board Meeting Attendance in 2023 |
15 |
Total Board Meetings in 2023 |
100% |
Committee Meeting Attendance in 2023 |
12 |
Total Committee Meetings in 2023 |
We are committed to sustainable corporate governance practices that promote long-term value creation, transparency and accountability for our stockholders. Based on investor feedback on our governance practices, along with our ongoing evaluation of best practices, we made a number of governance and disclosure enhancements in recent years.
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022+ |
Appointed a new independent female director following retirement of two directors Adopted a 1-year post-vesting holding period for equity awards Eliminated tax gross-up payments for executive perquisites | Updated the independent director retirement policy to reflect a 15-year term limit policy instead of a mandatory retirement age Aligned our ESG disclosure with the TCFD and SASB reporting frameworks | Codified the Board’s oversight of ESG matters in the Governance Committee Charter Published our 10th annual ESG Report and enhanced disclosure aligned with leading reporting frameworks, including TCFD | Appointed an independent female Vice Chair of the Board Rotated Board committee memberships Appointed a new director in March 2023 |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023+ | |||
Updated the independent director retirement policy to reflect a 15-year term limit policy instead of a mandatory retirement age
Aligned our ESG disclosure with the TCFD and SASB reporting frameworks | Codified the Board’s oversight of corporate responsibility matters in the Governance Committee Charter
Enhanced ESG disclosures according to leading reporting frameworks, including TCFD | Appointed an independent female Vice Chair of the Board
Rotated Board committee memberships | Appointed an independent female Board Chair
Appointed a new director in March 2023 and five new directors in March 2024 (five of these six directors are independent)
Rotated Board committee memberships, with two of three NYSE-required committees chaired by women |
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Policies
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines with respect to, among other things, Board composition, Board meetings, our Board’s standing committees, stockholder communications with our Board, |
CODES OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, as well as a Vendor Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Vendor Code”, and together with the Code of Conduct, the “Codes of Conduct”) that applies to our vendors and business partners. | ||
• | The Codes of Conduct represent an integral part of our commitment to the highest ethical standards, and are aimed at ensuring that our directors, employees and vendors work collectively to uphold those standards. The Board reviews the Codes of Conduct annually. | |
• | We provide annual training on the Code of Conduct to all of our employees, with 100% participation by active employees in | |
• | The Codes of Conduct address, among other things, labor practices and human rights, health and safety, environmental sustainability, conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, confidential information, competition and fair dealing, including relationships with customers and suppliers, gifts, protection of Company assets and compliance with laws. | |
• | The Code of Conduct also serves as the code of ethics required under applicable SEC rules for our senior financial officers. | |
• | Waivers of, and amendments to, our Code of Conduct that apply to our directors and executive officers will be timely posted on our website at healthpeak.com/esg/governance to the extent required by applicable SEC and NYSE rules. There were no such waivers in |
WHISTLEBLOWER HOTLINE
Our officers, employees, vendors and business partners are encouraged to report complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, auditing matters, violations of law, violations of our Codes of Conduct or other concerns regarding the conduct of Healthpeak’s employees, representatives or business partners through our secure whistleblower hotline, and we enable any reported concerns to be submitted anonymously. | ||
The whistleblower hotline is made available to employees via our intranet and to vendors and business partners via our website. In each case, the site leads the individual to an external, independent website operated by an independent service provider. | ||
Any matter reported through the whistleblower hotline and determined not to be frivolous or immaterial is reviewed first by our Audit Committee Chair and, in certain cases, by our General Counsel, Chief Human Resources Officer and/or our head of Internal Audit, and investigated and discussed with our Audit Committee and/or full Board. When appropriate, independent third parties assist in an investigation. | ||
• | No complaints reported through the whistleblower hotline in 2023. |
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Our General Counsel and our President and CEO initially review potential related person transactions for materiality and then provide them to the Audit Committee for review and approval, as appropriate. | ||
For this purpose, “related person transactions” are generally defined under applicable SEC rules as any transaction or series of transactions in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, 5% or greater stockholders or any of their respective immediate family members or certain related entities has a direct or indirect material interest. | ||
Under the Audit Committee Charter and our Related Person Transactions Policy, any related person transactions brought to the Audit Committee’s attention that could reasonably be expected to have a material impact on our financial statements must be discussed among the Audit Committee, management and Healthpeak’s independent auditor. | ||
In determining whether to approve or reject a related person transaction, the Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the proposed transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, as well as the extent of the related person’s economic interest in the transaction. | ||
No related person transactions |
Where to find ourcorporate governancedocuments | We encourage you to view the following corporate governance materials on our website at healthpeak.com/esg/governance: |
| • Board Committee Charters • Corporate Governance Guidelines |
| • Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | ||
|
|
| • Vendor Code of Business Conduct and Ethics |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 27 |
Corporate Governance
Risk Oversight
Board Responsibilities
Our Board believes that effective risk management involves our entire corporate governance framework. Both management and our Board have key responsibilities in managing risk throughout the Company, as shown below. The Board oversees the risk management process. Oversight of risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight are delegated to the various Board committees, with each committee working with management and reporting to our Board at each regular Board meeting.
Our risk management process includes checks and balances that allows our Independent Directors to review and consider any risk matters. In the event it is advisable that our Independent Directors review or take alternative action on management’s recommendation on any risk matters, our independent ChairmanChair has the authority to call and preside at special meetings or executive sessions of the Independent Directors as necessary or advisable.
Management proactively analyzes the short-, intermediate- andintermediate-and long-term risks that may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition. Management utilizes an ongoing assessment process that identifies material risks and implements management and mitigation strategies, reporting to and working with the Board and its committees. Our formal Enterprise Risk Management program identifies, assesses, evaluates, responds to and monitors the risks identified by management’s various subject matter experts across the Company, including finance, tax, legal, operations, internal audit and the business segments. Our General Counsel, who reports to our President and CEO, oversees our compliance program, and our Vice President of Internal Audit, who has a direct reporting line to our independent Audit Committee Chair, oversees our Enterprise Risk Management program and our ongoing risk assessment process.
After determining risks that could have a material business, operational or financial impact, management models the potential impact using a scorecard/heat map, in addition to analyzing trends of increasing or decreasing importance. Our Board and its committees receive reports from and engage with management regarding these risks, their potential impacts and the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate these risks, making determinations on any action warranted. These risks include short-, intermediate- andintermediate-and long-term risks, as well as both existing risks and emerging risks. Our Board’s oversight standards apply regardless of the immediacy of the risk assessed. Each of our current directors possesses risk oversight and management experience, which we believe makes our Board particularly effective in engaging with management to address existing risks and identify significant emerging risks.
In addition to identifying and mitigating risks, management assesses which risks merit disclosure in our periodic reports, including through a cross-functional management-level disclosure committee that meets quarterly to identify any significant emerging risks warranting disclosure, as well as an extensive annual cross-functional review of our risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow for timely decisions regarding disclosure. These disclosure controls and procedures, and the resulting assessments and determinations regarding disclosure of risks, are discussed regularly with our Board as part of its risk oversight function.
Our Board periodically reviews management’s risk mitigation strategies, including our crisis management response protocols and business continuity plan and crisis response protocols, with management to ensure that we appropriately and timely identify and respond to emerging risks. As determined appropriate, our Board is also guided by independent advisors, who report from time to time to the Board on various risk topics within their area of expertise. For example, an externala third-party cybersecurity consultantexpert presents to our Board at least annually regarding known and emerging cybersecurity risks and its cybersecurity reviews of our systems, and our independent auditors present to our Board regularly regarding various operational and other risks that could impact our financial statements. For additional discussion of our cybersecurity risk management and governance, see Part I, Item 1C. “Cybersecurity” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2024.
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Corporate Governance
Risk Oversight Responsibilities
Board Responsibilities | ||||||||||||
Oversight of the risk management process | Leadership of management succession planning | Review of periodic reports from Board committees on specific risk oversight responsibilities | ||||||||||
Development of business strategy and major resource allocation | Business conduct and compliance oversight |
AUDIT COMMITTEE | COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE | INVESTMENT COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
Management Responsibilities | ||
|
|
RISK AREAS |
|
|
|
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 29 |
Stockholder Engagement
We engage in proactive outreach to discuss business strategy, financial and operational performance, corporate governance and compensationresponsibility, among other topics of interest to our stockholders. We believe that ongoing dialogue with our stockholders is a critical component of responsive and transparent corporate governance. Stockholder feedback has been instrumental in structuring our executive compensationESG program, as well as enhancing our corporate governance practices. The following graphic illustrates our annual cycle of stockholder outreach:
We are committed to regular stockholder engagement and solicited our stockholders’ views on financial performance, governance, ESG and other issues in 2023.
OUTREACH | FOCUS AREAS | |||
• 14 industry investor conferences and numerous one- on-one meetings • Hosted management presentations and Lab and Medical City Dallas tours • 19 investor property tours | • Business performance and balance sheet and liquidity management • Corporate responsibility matters, such as sustainability and governance • Board and executive leadership outreach | |||
KEY TAKEAWAYS – WHAT WE HEARD | WHAT WE DID IN RESPONSE | |||
• Support for our strategy and solid operational performance • Questions about the impact of macroeconomic conditions and strategy to deal with potential headwinds in the Lab sector | • Embarked on transformative business combination with Physicians Realty Trust, which closed on March 1, 2024, to position ourselves as an industry leader for healthcare discovery and delivery • Proactive balance sheet management and continued intensive focus on leasing and tenant engagement | |||
30 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
If you wish to contact members of our Board, the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chair of the Board, any Board committee, or our Independent Directors as a group, you may send written correspondence to our Corporate Secretary at Healthpeak Properties, Inc., 4600 South Syracuse Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80237. Please clearly note the name(s) of any specific intended Board recipients. If you are a stockholder, please also provide documentation of share ownership and appropriate contact information in all correspondence. Our Corporate Secretary will process and direct your communication to the appropriate member(s) of our Board, other than items unrelated to our Board’s duties, such as spam, junk mail, solicitations, employment inquires and similar items (at their request). This centralized process assists our Board in reviewing and responding to stockholder and interested party communications in a more efficient manner.
ESGResponsibility Initiatives
Our Board believes that integrating ESG initiatives into our strategic business objectives is critical to our long-term success. Through our integrated and ongoing approach to sustainability, we seek to drive positive change and create value for our stakeholders.stakeholders through corporate responsibility and stewardship.
Oversees all | ||
Oversees quality and integrity of quantitative public disclosures relating to ESG |
Oversees our climate risk management, corporate governance and |
Oversees executive compensation and human capital matters |
| ||
|
|
|
ESG Focus Areas
Informed by internal assessments and stakeholder engagement, we prioritize the ESG initiatives that we believe matter most to our business and stakeholders, keeping in mind our operational level of control with respect to our properties. Our key performance indicators for these areas include:
Value Creation • | Cost savings • | Tenant attraction and satisfaction • Sustainable returns | |
Climate Risk | Governance | Social |
| ||
Efficient buildings to generate savings
Proactive green strategies |
Best-in-class corporate governance practices
Transparency
Risk management
Ethics and compliance |
Diversity
Talent acquisition, retention and development
Employee engagement and satisfaction
Community engagement |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 31 |
Corporate Governance
Climate, Environment and Resiliency
We recognize the urgency of climate risk and its potential impact on our communities. At the forefrontIn 2023, we undertook an extensive review of our ESG strategy, we strive to own sustainable buildings, minimize our carbon footprintsustainability practices and reduce operating costs.progress and developed a comprehensive 10-year strategic roadmap, with the following specific near-term focus areas:
Decarbonization: Conduct a full inventory of GHG emissions across the newly combined company portfolio to identify data gaps and assist in establishing new long-term GHG emissions reduction targets |
Published our | |
Conducted a top-down review and refinement of our sustainability strategy | |
Continued implementing projects to achieve our long-term science-based GHG emissions reduction targets, as well as energy, water and waste reduction goals | |
Continued focusing on diversity and inclusion initiatives | |
132 new ENERGY STAR certifications and 4 new LEED certifications in 2023 |
We are consistently recognized for our corporate responsibility initiatives and disclosure. See “Proxy Summary—Corporate Responsibility Highlights” for a summary of our recent recognitions. To learn more about our ESG efforts, including our | |
Our Board was an early adopter of board-level human capital management oversight and formally amended the Compensation Committee Charter in 2018 to memorialize its oversight of human capital matters. Our Board believes that human capital management is vital to the Company’s organizational health and is strongly committed to diversity and equal opportunity, with the tone set from the top. The Compensation Committee has oversight over human capital matters, including culture, diversity, equity, inclusion, talent acquisition, retention, employee satisfaction and engagement, succession planning and executive compensation.
Diversity Employee satisfaction and engagement: Helps us retain top talent and continuously enhance our performance Attracting top talent: Positions us for long-term success | Training and development: Helps enhance career and professional development and identify emerging leaders Compensation and benefits: Provides merit-based, equitable compensation to attract, retain and recognize top talent Community partnership: Provides support to charitable organizations and initiatives that share our mission | Health, safety and wellness: Protects our most vital assets – our employees – through special training and other measures | |||
Succession planning: Ensures that top management positions can be filled without undue interruption |
Key 2022 ESG Initiatives
| |
our Board.
Our Board has determined that an appropriate structure for Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the considerations relating to our Board leadership. These considerations include potentially filling the positions of Chair of the Board and CEO by one individual or two different individuals as the Board determines is appropriate. The Board believes it is important to structure its leadership based upon its assessment of the Company’s needs including, without limitation, our business, strategic opportunities and succession planning priorities. Our Board also takes into account the views of institutional investors and proxy advisory firms, as well as governance and industry |
Katherine M. Sandstrom Chair of the Board |
Katherine M. Sandstrom serves as our independent Chair of the Board. Our Chair actively manages our Board by:
•
Presiding at all meetings of our Board
•
Establishing the agenda for each Board meeting in consultation with our management team
•
Calling and presiding at executive sessions of the Independent Directors Corporate Governance
Board Leadership Structure
Independent Chairman and Vice Chair
As part of its ongoing evaluations, our Board carefully considers the appropriate Board leadership structure, taking into account each director’s skills, experience and perspectives, as well as the current and future needs of the Company and our Board.
Our Board has determined that an appropriate structure for the Company and its stockholders at this time includes an independent Chairman of the Board and independent Vice Chair. These roles effectively allocate authority, responsibility and oversight between management and the independent members of our Board. This structure gives primary responsibility for the operational leadership and strategic direction to the CEO, while enabling our independent Chairman and Vice Chair to facilitate our Board’s oversight of management, promote communication between management and the Board and support our Board’s consideration of key governance and ESG matters.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the considerations relating to our Board leadership. These considerations include potentially filling the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO by one individual or two different individuals as the Board determines is appropriate. The Board believes it is important to structure its leadership based upon its assessment of the Company’s needs including, without limitation, our business, strategic opportunities and succession planning priorities. Our Board also takes into account the views of institutional investors and proxy advisory firms, as well as governance and industry trends.
•
Engaging with management on topics discussed in executive session as needed
•
Planning for future Board leadership roles and succession, as well as orderly director refreshment, including actively overseeing the search for potential director candidates
We engage in ongoing stockholder outreach and dialogue on a variety of issues, including with respect to corporate governance matters such as our Board’s composition and leadership structure. In addition, our independent Chairman, independent Vice Chair and independent Board committee chairs represent the Board in stockholder outreach and engagement as they deem necessary or advisable. Should our Board determine that a combined ChairmanChair and CEO position is appropriate, our Board would decide whether and when to seek additional prior stockholder input, balancing the needs of the Company and the considerations driving the timing and disclosure of the appointment.
Brian G. Cartwright serves as our independent Chairman of the Board. Our Chairman actively manages our Board by:
In connection with the above responsibilities, our ChairmanChair leads our Board in overseeing the management and direction of the Company; however, any specific actions taken in connection with this oversight responsibility are exercised by our full Board or any Board committee to which authority has been delegated by our Board, and not by any individual director.
Katherine M. Sandstrom serves as our independent Vice Chair of the Board. Our Vice Chair supports our Board by helping to plan for future Board leadership roles and succession, as well as orderly director refreshment, including actively overseeing the search for potential director candidates.
Executive Sessions
The Independent Directors hold regular executive sessions to provide an opportunity to discuss matters without Company management present, including our President and CEO. These executive sessions allow for candid conversations and promote the independence of our Board from management. Executive sessions often follow regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, but are also sometimes held independently of regular Board and committee meetings. Any Independent Director may call an executive session.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 33 |
Corporate Governance
Board Committees
Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which has a written charter available on our website at healthpeak.com/esg/governance. Our Board also has a standing Investment and Finance Committee to review Healthpeak’s potential investments, financing requirements and related capital structure, plans and strategies.
As a corporate governance best practice, the Governance Committee annually considers the composition of our standing Board committees to ensure an appropriate balance of workloads and a diversity of perspectives. The committee descriptions below reflect the current membership of the standing committees of our Board and the number of meetings and attendance for each in 2022. Ms. Kennard served on the Audit2023. Messrs. Brinker and Compensation Committees until her departure in July 2022 and attended 100% of Board and Committee meetings during this time. Mr. Brinker doesThomas do not and will not serve on any Board committees.
Following the Annual Meeting and subject to their election by stockholders, we anticipate that Ms. Kessler will serve on the Audit Committee, Ms. Lias-Booker will serve on the Governance Committee, and Governor Thompson and Mr. Connor was appointed toWeiss will serve on the Board in March 2023Investment and has not yet been appointed to any Board committees.Finance Committee, with Governor Thompson serving as Chair of that committee.
Audit
CURRENT MEMBERS R. Kent Griffin, Jr.*, Chair James B. Connor* | RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
|
|
2022 HIGHLIGHTS
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
Oversee independent auditor | |||
| Oversee annual assessment of internal controls and the internal audit function | ||
| Review independence and quality control procedures of independent auditor | ||
| Oversee financial statement and internal control integrity and processes, including implementation of new accounting standards | ||
| Plan annual audit with management, independent auditor and internal audit team | ||
| Communicate with independent auditor regarding conduct of the audit and other matters, including review of critical audit matters and issues encountered during the annual audit | ||
| Pre-approve audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor | ||
| Oversee legal and regulatory compliance and enterprise risk management activities | ||
| Oversee information and cybersecurity risk • Oversee quality and | ||
integrity of quantitative public disclosures relating to ESG matters
| Review strategy for use of swaps or derivative instruments for hedging risks | ||
| Review quarterly and annual financial statements and related disclosures | ||
| Review related person transactions | ||
KEY MEMBER SKILLS • High level of financial experience • Senior leadership experience • Risk oversight/management experience Total 2023 Meetings: 4 | 2023 HIGHLIGHTS • Reviewed portfolio and operational risk management plans, including cybersecurity risk mitigation practices • Oversaw use of non-GAAP financial measures and other accounting policies | ||
Investment 100% INDEPENDENT CURRENT MEMBERS David B. Henry, Chair Christine N. Garvey R. Kent Griffin, Jr. | RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
|
|
2022 HIGHLIGHTS
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
Review our investment policies and related financing requirements, plans and strategies • Review potential significant acquisitions, dispositions, developments or redevelopments of single properties or portfolios of properties |
KEY MEMBER SKILLS • REIT/real estate experience • Public company executive/Board experience • Investment expertise Total 2023 Meetings: 1 2023 Meeting Attendance: 100% | 2023 HIGHLIGHTS • Reviewed and advised on significant transactions and developments | |
Corporate Governance
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Compensation 100% INDEPENDENT CURRENT MEMBERS Sara G. Lewis, Chair Brian G. Cartwright James B. Connor Christine N. Garvey
| RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
|
|
2022 HIGHLIGHTS
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
Determine executive compensation, including approving performance goals, objectives and target opportunities | |
| Evaluate executive officer performance annually in connection with compensation decisions |
| Review director compensation and recommend changes to our Board |
| Periodically review all annual cash incentive, equity incentive, 401(k), severance and change-in-control plans |
| Assess risks related to compensation arrangements |
| Oversee the administration of the clawback policy • Consider results of stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation |
| Review and discuss with management the compensation discussion and analysis, and recommend to our Board whether it be included in the annual proxy statement |
| Review and approve independent compensation consultant engagement |
| Oversee human capital matters |
| Grant equity awards or delegate such authority to a subcommittee (the Board and Compensation Committee have delegated authority to Mr. Brinker to grant certain equity awards to non-executive employees within certain limits) |
For information on the role of Ferguson Partners Consulting L.P. (“Ferguson Partners Consulting”), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, relating to executive compensation decisions, as well as the role of our President and CEO for our other executive officers, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
| ||
KEY MEMBER SKILLS • Senior leadership experience
Total
| 2023 HIGHLIGHTS • |
2022 HIGHLIGHTS
Provided oversight of and guidance on • Made 2023 compensation determinations based on approved 2023 compensation plans • Established 2024 executive compensation plans and approved compensation of management team members | ||
|
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
100% INDEPENDENT CURRENT MEMBERS Katherine M. Brian G. Cartwright David B. Henry Sara G. Lewis | RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE: • Develop and oversee Corporate Governance Guidelines applicable to our Board | |
| Oversee corporate governance, sustainability and | |
| Oversee policy on director time commitments • Review Codes of Conduct and the enforcement procedures in place at least annually | |
| Identify qualified candidates as potential Board members | |
| Recommend candidates for election at annual stockholder meeting and to fill Board vacancies | |
| Oversee annual Board and committee evaluation process | |
| Oversee Board and committee composition and recommend committee rotations when appropriate | |
| Review performance of each director at least annually and assess continued suitability as a director when he or she has a change in job responsibilities |
KEY MEMBER SKILLS • Legal/regulatory experience • Public company executive/Board experience • Risk oversight/management experience Total 2023 Meetings: 4 2023 Meeting Attendance: 100% | 2023 HIGHLIGHTS • Provided oversight and guidance on corporate governance matters • Oversaw corporate responsibility initiatives and climate risk strategy and received regular management updates on corporate responsibility strategy and performance • Oversaw the search for new director candidates, leading to the appointment of one new director in 2023 and five new director appointments in connection with our merger with Physicians Realty Trust | ||
Annual Compensation
In consultation with Ferguson Partners Consulting, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews our Independent Director compensation program for continued alignment with comparable companies and sound governance practices. In connection with this review, Ferguson Partners Consulting performs a benchmarking analysis of ourpractices and last reviewed director compensation program against our proxy peer companies identified on page 58. As a result of this analysis and upon Ferguson Partners Consulting’s recommendation, our Boardin 2022. The Committee determined not to update annualmake any changes to director compensation to better align director compensation with compensation paid to the directors of our peer companies. In making this determination, our Board reviewed peer director compensation, relative Board size, number of meetings and roles and responsibilities of committees, noting that director compensation had not been updated since 2020. Our Board approved the following changes in 2022:for 2023.
● Annual equity retainer increased from $160,000 to $180,000
● Independent Chairman annual fee increased from $110,000 to $140,000
● Vice Chair annual fee was set at $70,000
● Audit Committee member annual fee increased from $15,000 to $17,500
● Compensation Committee member annual fee increased from $7,500 to $10,000
● Governance Committee Chair annual fee increased from $15,000 to $20,000, and member annual fee increased from $5,000 to $9,000
● Investment Committee Chair annual fee increased from $20,000 to $25,000, and member annual fee increased from $5,000 to $7,500
Compensation paid to our Independent Directors for services in 20222023 is further described below. Mr. Brinker, our President and CEO and a director, received no separate compensation for his services as a director in 2022.2023. Mr. Thomas will not receive compensation in connection with his service on the Board. Following the closing of our merger with Physicians Realty Trust on March 1, 2024, Mr. Thomas receives compensation as our employee beginning in 2024, with total aggregate compensation of $100,000 annual base salary, $400,000 annual restricted unit grant and standard employee benefits, which amounts will be included in the 2024 Director Compensation table in next year’s proxy statement.
ANNUAL INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
ADDITIONAL ANNUAL CASH COMPENSATION | |||
Independent | |||
Independent Vice Chair: | |||
Audit Committee • | |||
• Member – $17,500 Compensation Committee • Chair – $30,000 • Member – $10,000 | Governance Committee • | Chair – $20,000 • | |
Member – $9,000 | |||
Investment Committee • | |||
Chair – $25,000 • | |||
* Ms. Sandstrom served as Independent Vice Chair for a portion of 2023Independent Director Cash Compensation
We pay an annual cash retainer of $85,000 to each director, as well as an additional annual cash retainer of $140,000 to our independent Chairman andChair (and an additional $70,000, prorated, to ourMs. Sandstrom in connection with her role as independent Vice Chair for the portion of the year in which she served in that role) and committee fees as set forth in the table above. The Board determined to appoint a Vice Chair to assist our Board and Chairman of the Board in planning for future Board leadership roles and succession, as well as refreshment. In 2022, Mr. Henry was also paid a fee of $50,000 for his additional work in supporting the Chairman of the Board prior to Ms. Sandstrom formally being appointed as Vice Chair in the newly created role.
We also pay Independent Directors an additional $1,500 per meeting fee for each Board or individual committee meeting they attend beyond 10 meetings of our Board or that committee, as applicable, in a given calendar year (for example, for each Audit Committee meeting after 10 Audit Committee meetings in one calendar year). In 2022,2023, there were nofive such additional meetings.
All cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears and prorated based on the number of days that a member serves in the applicable capacity. We also reimburse Independent Directors for director education and reasonable travel expenses in connection with their Board duties.
Director Compensation—2022
Independent Director Equity Compensation
We grant an annual equity retainer in restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with a grant date fair value of $180,000, rounded up to the nearest whole share, to each Independent Director who is elected at the annual meeting of stockholders or is initially appointed as an Independent Director other than at the annual meeting. The award for a new Independent Director who is initially appointed other than at an annual meeting may be pro-rated. In 2022,2023, each independent director was granted an annual equity award in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair market value of $180,034$180,000 on April 28, 2022.2023. The RSUs cliff-vest in full on the earliest of the first anniversary of the grant date, the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders, or the termination of the independent director’s service due to death disability or a retirement from the Board at age 65 with at least five years of service or age 60 with at least 15 years of service.disability. The awards are subject to forfeiture if the independent director’s service terminates for any other reason. The Compensation Committee believes that the 1-year cliff vesting promotes retention during the annual term in which our directors serve.
36 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
The following table summarizes the compensation of the Independent Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.2023.
NAME (a) | FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH ($) (b) | STOCK AWARDS ($)(1) (c) | TOTAL ($) (h) | |||||||||
Brian G. Cartwright | 226,155 | 180,034 | 406,189 | |||||||||
Christine N. Garvey | 109,112 | 180,034 | 289,146 | |||||||||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. | 132,057 | 180,034 | 312,091 | |||||||||
David B. Henry | 173,707 | 180,034 | 353,741 | |||||||||
Lydia H. Kennard | 89,019 | 180,034 | 269,053 | |||||||||
Sara G. Lewis | 127,693 | 180,034 | 307,727 | |||||||||
Katherine M. Sandstrom | 149,173 | 180,034 | 329,207 |
NAME(1) (A) | FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH ($) (b) | STOCK AWARDS ($)(2) (c) | TOTAL ($) (h) | |||
Brian G. Cartwright | 178,670 | 180,000 | 358,670 | |||
James B. Connor | 58,536 | 180,000 | 238,536 | |||
Christine N. Garvey | 120,000 | 180,000 | 300,000 | |||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. | 127,500 | 180,000 | 307,500 | |||
David B. Henry | 136,500 | 180,000 | 316,500 | |||
Sara G. Lewis | 124,000 | 180,000 | 304,000 | |||
Katherine M. Sandstrom | 210,934 | 180,000 | 390,934 |
(1) | Messrs. Thomas and Weiss, Governor Thompson and Mses. Kessler and Lias-Booker did not serve as directors during 2023. |
(2) | RSUs issued pursuant to the |
Director Compensation—2022
Director Compensation Policies and Plans
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Independent Directors are required to accumulate and hold shares of Healthpeak stock (including RSUs) equal in value to at least five times the amount of the annual cash retainer for Independent Directors.Directors (i.e., $425,000). The guidelines are effective on the first May 15 that occurs more than five years after an Independent Director first becomes a member of our Board. Once subject to the guidelines, an Independent Director’s level of stock ownership will be reviewed annually on May 15 for as long as the director remains in office. Shares that count toward the satisfaction of the stock ownership guidelines include shares of our common stock beneficially held (directly or indirectly) by the Independent Director, vested or unvested restricted stock units, and shares of our common stock deferred under a deferred compensation plan. The Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing, overseeing and monitoring compliance with the director stock ownership guidelines. All of our Independent Directors for whom the guidelines were effective as of May 15, 2022,2023 satisfied our director stockthe required level of ownership guidelines as of that date.
We maintain a deferred compensation plan (the “Director Deferral Plan”), which permits our Independent Directors to elect to defer their annual retainers. Amounts deferred under the Director Deferral Plan generally are payable in cash as a lump sum, in monthly installments, or a combination of both, as elected by the director, upon the termination of the director’s service on our Board, the director’s death or such earlier date as elected by the director. A director participating in the Director Deferral Plan may elect to have his or her deferred compensation credited to (i) an interest rate account wherein the deferrals accrue interest at a rate equal to the current prime rate minus 1%, or (ii) a stock credit account wherein the deferrals are treated as if invested in our common stock with the account increasing for dividends paid, and increasing or decreasing in value with changes in our stock price. None of our Independent Directors currently participate in this plan.
Under the Non-Employee Director Stock-for-Fees Program, each of our Independent Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their annual retainer and meeting fees in the form of shares of our common stock in lieu of payment in cash. The election will apply to the elected amount of such fees that would otherwise be paid in cash, commencing with the fiscal quarter after the election is made. Shares will be issued as soon as practicable after we pay an ordinary cash dividend to our stockholders following the date that cash director fees for the preceding quarter would otherwise be payable to the director. The number of shares issued will be determined by dividing the amount of the fees by the average closing price of our common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the relevant dividend payment date. None of our Independent Directors currently participate in this program.
Scott M. Brinker, DIRECTOR SINCE: 2022 | |||
Mr. Brinker has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2022. He previously served as President and Chief Investment Officer from January 2020 until October 2022 and Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer from March 2018 until December 2019. Before joining Healthpeak, Mr. Brinker was at Welltower Inc. (NYSE: WELL), a healthcare REIT, from 2001 to 2017, most recently as its Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. He is also an Executive Board Member of Nareit. | |||
Peter A. Scott, | |||
Mr. Scott has been our Chief Financial Officer since February 2017. He previously also served as Executive Vice President from February 2017 to July 2021. Prior to joining Healthpeak in February 2017, Mr. Scott served as a Managing Director, Real Estate Banking Group of Barclays, a financial services firm listed on the London Stock Exchange, from 2014 to 2017. His experience also includes various positions of increasing responsibility at the financial services firms Credit Suisse from 2011 to 2014, Barclays from 2008 to 2011 and Lehman Brothers from 2002 to 2008. | |||
Thomas M. Klaritch, | |||
Mr. Klaritch has been our Chief Operating Officer since September 2017. He previously also served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Development Officer from February 2019 to July 2021, as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from August 2017 to February 2019, as Executive Vice President – Medical Office Properties from April 2008 to August 2017, and as Senior Vice President – Medical Office Properties from October 2003 to April 2008. Prior to joining Healthpeak, Mr. Klaritch was a founding member and Chief Financial Officer of MedCap Properties LLC, a company that owned, operated and developed healthcare real estate (Healthpeak acquired MedCap Properties LLC in October 2003). He has | |||
Our Executive Officers
Scott R. Bohn, | ||
Mr. Bohn has been our Chief Development Officer and Head of Lab since February 2024, and prior to that, he served as Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of | ||
| |||
Jeffrey H. Miller, | |||
Mr. Miller has been our General Counsel since November 2022. He previously served as Executive Vice President – Development from April 2021 to October 2022, as Executive Vice President – Senior Housing from January 2020 to March 2021 and as Senior Vice President – Senior Housing Asset Management from November 2018 to December 2019. Prior to joining Healthpeak, Mr. Miller served as Chief Operating Officer at Welltower, Inc. (NYSE: WELL), a healthcare REIT, from July 2014 to January 2017, and General Counsel from July 2004 to July 2014. He was a partner at the law firm Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP from 1996 to 2004, where he represented a broad range of clients in corporate and real estate matters. | |||
Our Executive Officers
Shawn G. Johnston, | |||
Mr. Johnston has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since February 2019. He previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from August 2017 until January 2019. Prior to joining Healthpeak in August 2017, Mr. Johnston served as Vice President – Chief Accounting Officer of UDR, Inc. (NYSE: UDR), a multifamily real estate investment trust, from March 2016 to August 2017, and Vice President – Controller from September 2013 until March 2016. He also served as Interim Principal Financial Officer of UDR from June 2016 through December 2016. From August 2010 to August 2013, Mr. Johnston served as Chief Accounting Officer at American Residential Communities LLC, a residential real estate company. Prior to that, he served in the Ernst & Young LLP Audit Department, specializing in real estate, from October 2002 to August 2010. | |||
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 39 |
Ankit B. Patadia, | |||
Mr. Patadia has been our Executive Vice President and Treasurer | |||
Adam G. Mabry,39, Chief Investment Officer | ||
Mr. Mabry has been our Chief Investment Officer since October 2022. He previously served as Senior Vice President – Investments from February 2018 to October 2022 and as Vice President – Corporate Transactions from June 2017 to January 2018. Prior to joining Healthpeak, Mr. Mabry was a Vice President at The Wolff Company, a fully-integrated real estate private equity firm, where he focused on executing structured transactions across the multifamily, senior and affordable housing sectors. Prior to that, he was a Vice President at Barclays in the real estate investment banking group. Mr. Mabry is a Chartered Financial Analyst® charterholder. | ||
Lisa A. Alonso, | |||
Ms. Alonso has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since January 2020. She joined Healthpeak in 2014 and served in a variety of roles, including Senior Vice President – Human Resources from February 2018 to December 2019, Vice President – Human Resources from January 2016 to January 2018, Director – Human Resources from April 2015 to December 2015, and Manager – Human Resources from November 2014 to April 2015. Prior to joining Healthpeak, Ms. Alonso served as Director of Human Resources/HR Business Partner at The Irvine Company’s Resort at Pelican Hill from April 2013 to July 2014. Prior to that, she served as Vice President of Human Resources and Director of Recruiting and Training at California First National Bancorp (Nasdaq: CFNB) from February 2003 to March 2013. | |||
40 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, stockholders are entitled to cast a nonbinding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs (often referred to as “say-on-pay”). Accordingly, you are being asked to vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the NEOs, as disclosed in the proxy statement, which includes the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the accompanying tables, and the related narrative disclosure, pursuant to the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules.
Our Board recommends that you vote FOR this resolution because it believes that our executive compensation program supports our compensation objectives and philosophies, including:
Aligning compensation with stockholder interests and promoting long-term stockholder value creation | ||
Providing a straightforward and transparent compensation program, with rigorous, objective and at-risk performance, including future relative TSR as a significant component | ||
Attracting, motivating and retaining key employees with outstanding talent and ability | ||
Discouraging excessive risk-taking by balancing | ||
Paying for performance, with a meaningful portion of compensation tied to the Company’s strategic and financial goals, with limited fixed or discretionary components | ||
Robust oversight by an independent Board committee |
Voting StandardThis proposal to approve the compensation paid to our NEOs |
Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation
Stockholders are afforded the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often an advisory vote on executive compensation should be included in our proxy materials for future annual stockholder meetings (or a special stockholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting). Under this Proposal No. 3, stockholders may vote to have the advisory vote on executive compensation every year, every two years or every three years. As required under SEC rules, we are required to submit this frequency vote to stockholders every six years.
Since 2011, our Board has provided stockholders with an opportunity to vote on executive compensation at every annual meeting. Our Board continues to believe that advisory votes on executive compensation should be conducted every year so that stockholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program, which feedback the Compensation Committee considers in structuring the annual compensation program. If you do not have a preference regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, you should abstain from voting on the proposal.
| |
41 |
Dear Stockholders,
As the members of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, we are responsible for overseeing the design and implementation of a competitive executive compensation program that furthers the interests of stockholders and demonstrates strong pay-for-performance alignment. This responsibility includes listening to and considering your views on executive compensation. We also help oversee management’s efforts to develop and implement a robust human capital management program.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, that follows describes what we pay, why we pay it and how we made our executive compensation decisions in 2022.2023. Our compensation philosophy is intended to align the interests of our executives and stockholders through a transparent and rigorous compensation program.
We incentivize our executives by offering a combination of performance-based and fixed compensation, with a significant portion at risk in the form of performance-based equity awards. The value of these awards depends upon the value of our common stock, which we believe further aligns executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. We believe this compensation philosophy also motivates our talented management team, promotes the execution of our business strategy in a manner that focuses on long-term stockholder value creation, encourages prudent risk management and enhances retention of our executive team in a competitive marketplace for talent.
The key objectives of our compensation program include:
Aligning executive compensation with the interests of our stockholders | |
Linking a significant portion of executive compensation to the achievement of key financial and strategic goals | |
Providing a transparent compensation program with objective performance hurdles with a substantial possibility of not being achieved | |
Evaluating hurdles across multiple metrics and performance periods, including 3-year relative total stockholder return, or TSR, performance | |
Limiting discretionary compensation components while maintaining flexibility to compensate for individual performance |
In 2022,2023, base salary increases for our named executive officers were limited to increases in connection with certain promotions, and we did not increase base salaries other thanthe target-level opportunities under the short-term incentive plan (STIP), our annual cash bonus program, except in connection with certainone promotion. We increased named executive promotions. In addition, allofficers’ target-level long-term incentive plan (LTIP) opportunities in 2023 to better align equity compensation with the equity compensation of similarly-situated executives at peer companies.
Our executive compensation program payout results reflect our pay-for-performance philosophy. The objective metrics under our 2022 short-term incentive plan (STIP)2023 STIP were achieved at above-target levels, aligning executive bonus payouts with the Company’s financial, operational and operationalESG performance. The 2021 LTIP, covering a three-year performance period of 2021–2023, paid out below target level based on our total stockholder return performance relative to objectively-defined peer indices, further reinforcing the importance of aligning the management team’s compensation with long-term stockholder value creation.
We remain firm in our beliefbelieve that our compensation program provides compelling incentives for our executives, which in turn benefits our stockholders by driving our business strategy and goals. We also believe our stockholders’ interests are best served over time by a balanced compensation program that takes a long-term, holistic view of our business strategy and emphasizes the drivers of long-term value creation.
Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report
We reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management, as well as the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant and legal advisors. Based upon this review and discussion, we recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sara G. Lewis (Chair) Independent | Brian G. Cartwright Independent Director | James B. Connor Independent Director | Christine N. Garvey Independent Director | |||||||||
Independent Director | ||||||||||||
The foregoing report of the Compensation Committee is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.
42 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Named Executive Officers
Our CD&A describes Healthpeak’s 20222023 executive compensation program for the named executive officers, or NEOs, listed below.
Scott M. Brinker President and Chief Executive Officer | Peter A. Scott Chief Financial Officer | Thomas M. Klaritch Chief Operating Officer | Scott R. Bohn Chief Development Officer and Head of Lab | Ankit B. Patadia, Executive Vice President and Treasurer – Corporate Finance | |||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer | Chief Operating Officer | Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of Life Science | Chief Investment Officer |
20222023 Compensation Program Overview
Consistent with our goals of aligning executive and stockholder interests and appropriately incentivizing our executives, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, or the Compensation Committee, adopted a compensation program that incorporates a mix of at-risk incentives and fixed pay designed to accomplish the key objectives of our executive compensation program. The key objectives of our executive compensation program are outlined in the Letter from Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee above. In 2022,2023, our compensation program consisted of the following key elements, as further detailed under “2022“2023 NEO Compensation” below.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 43 |
Key Compensation Elements
BASE SALARY | + | ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITIES | + | LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITIES | ||||||
|
|
|
2023 | 2023 Changes: Target-level bonus opportunities remained flat from 2022 except in connection with certain executive promotions; increased weighting of objective, quantitative metrics and decreased weighting of individual performance metric | 2023 Changes: Target-level opportunities increased to align executive pay with similarly-situated executives at peer companies; simplified number of peer indices used to measure relative TSR | ||||||||
Pay-for-Performance Philosophy
Our executive compensation program rewards successful annual performance and encourages long-term value creation for our stockholders. NEO short- andshort-and long-term incentive compensation is subject to rigorous, objective, at-risk performance hurdles across multiple metrics and performance periods, which the Compensation Committee intends to incentivize management to drive Company performance and encourage prudent risk management consistent with the Company’s financial and strategic goals. The below graphics illustrate the mix of 20222023 fixed pay (base salary) and at-risk pay incentives (cash incentive compensation and grant date fair value of equity awards granted during the year), presented at the target level of performance, for our President and CEO and our other NEOs (excluding Messrs. Herzog and McHenry, who terminated employment during the year).NEOs.
44 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
| ||
STOCKHOLDER-FRIENDLY PRACTICES WE FOLLOW | PRACTICES WE AVOID | |
|
|
Say-on-Pay Results The Compensation Committee considers our say-on-pay vote results in approving our executive compensation program. The Committee determined to maintain the core structure of our overall executive compensation program for
|
In |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 45 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
20222023 NEO Compensation
The Compensation Committee oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation program and evaluates these programs against Company performance, competitive practices, legal and regulatory developments and corporate governance trends. The Committee considers analysis and recommendations from Ferguson Partners Consulting when making compensation decisions. Additionally, our President and Chief Executive Officer provides feedback to the Committee with respect to our other executive officers based on individual performance.
Scott M. Brinker,President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
2023 TARGET COMPENSATION: ($ • | |||
No changes were made to • In connection with his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2022, Mr. Brinker’s 2023 target-level LTIP opportunity was increased from $2.98 million to • The Compensation Committee established overall compensation for Mr. Brinker, as a new CEO, on the lower end of market practices and anticipates to | |||
Peter A. Scott, Chief Financial Officer | |||
2023 TARGET COMPENSATION: ($ | |||
MILLIONS) • No changes were made to • 2023 target-level LTIP opportunity was increased from $1.75 million to $2.35 million to better align |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
46 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Thomas M. Klaritch,Chief Operating Officer | |||
2023 TARGET COMPENSATION: ($ | |||
MILLIONS) • No changes were made to 2023 base salary or STIP opportunity compared to 2022. • 2023 target-level LTIP opportunity was increased from $1.5 million to $1.75 million to better align Mr. Klaritch’s | |||
Scott R. Bohn,Chief Development Officer and | |||
2023 TARGET COMPENSATION: $2.03 MILLION ($ MILLIONS) • 2023 base salary was increased from $500,000 to $525,000 in connection with Mr. Bohn’s promotion in October 2022. • The Compensation Committee determined not to make changes to Mr. Bohn’s 2023 STIP opportunity or 2023 target-level LTIP opportunity, noting that promotion-related increases were made to Mr. Bohn’s STIP opportunity and LTIP award opportunity in late 2022, as disclosed in our proxy statement filed with the SEC in calendar year 2023. | |||
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Ankit B. Patadia,Executive Vice President and Treasurer – Corporate Finance | |||
2023 TARGET COMPENSATION: $1.33 MILLION (not including promotion retentive award) ($ MILLIONS) • | |||
Mr. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
($ millions) | |||
The 2022 compensation for Mr. Herzog, our former Chief Executive Officer, was $1,150,000 base salary, $2,300,000 target-level STIP opportunity, and $7,000,000 target-level LTIP opportunity, reflecting no changes from 2021. The 2022 compensation for Mr. McHenry, our former Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel, was $600,000 base salary, $650,000 target-level STIP opportunity, and $1,250,000 target-level LTIP opportunity, reflecting an increase of $200,000 to his 2021 LTIP opportunity to better align his compensation with similarly situated executives at peer companies. In connection with his departure from the Company in November 2022, Mr. McHenry forfeited his 2022 annual cash incentive and outstanding unvested LTIP awards, including his 2022 LTIP award.
Following reviews by the Compensation Committee in JanuaryIn October 2022 and again in October 2022 ofFebruary 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed executive compensation data for peers with substantially similar roles and responsibilitiesof peer companies prepared by Ferguson Partners Consulting (as described below under “Compensation Policies and Practices—Peer Company Comparison”),. Following this review, the Committee determined not to increase base salaries for Messrs. Brinker, Scott, Klaritch, Herzog or McHenry in 2022.
Based on the review of compensation data for peers with substantially similar roles and responsibilities, the base salaries for Messrs. Bohn and Mabry were increasedPatadia in connection with their promotions, to better align theirbased on its review of compensation with similarly situateddata for executives at peer companies.companies with substantially similar roles and responsibilities prepared by Ferguson Partners Consulting (as described under “Compensation Policies and Practices – Peer Company Comparison”). Mr. Mabry’s 2022Bohn’s 2023 salary was increased from $441,000$500,000 to $460,000 prior to his promotion to Chief Investment Officer,$525,000 annually, and from $460,000 to $500,000 (on a prorated basis) in connection with his promotion in October 2022. Mr. Bohn’s 2022Patadia’s 2023 salary was increased from $363,500$350,000 to $450,000 in connection with his promotion$425,000 annually. No changes were made to Executive Vice President in January 2022the annual base salary levels for Messrs. Brinker, Scott and then to $500,000 (on a prorated basis) in October 2022 in connection with his promotion to Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of Life Science.Klaritch.
NAME | 2023 ANNUAL BASE SALARY ($) |
Scott M. Brinker | 750,000 |
Peter A. Scott | 650,000 |
Thomas M. Klaritch | 600,000 |
Scott R. Bohn | 525,000 |
Ankit B. Patadia | 425,000 |
48 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
20222023 Short-Term Incentive Plan Structure
Our NEOs are eligible to receive annual cash bonuses under the 20222023 STIP based on the achievement of performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee for the performance period and taking into account individual performance.
In selecting metrics and weighting for the 2023 STIP, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the Company’s strategic focus on portfolio quality, a strong balance sheet, and organic growth complemented by acquisitions and developments, as well as the importance of ESG to our Company’s business and long-term strategy. Considering these goals, together with feedback from our stockholders during ongoing engagement and input from Ferguson Partners Consulting, the Committee determined it would be appropriate to reduce the weighting of the individual performance metric from 40% to 30%, and increase the weighting of the objective financial metrics, Normalized FFO per share and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre, from 30% to 35% and 15% to 20%, respectively. The Committee approved the following 20222023 STIP annual metrics and weighting, which remained unchanged from 2021.weighting.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Normalized FFO Per Share |
Funds from operations (FFO) is a commonly used REIT financial metric defined by Nareit; Normalized FFO per share is adjusted to exclude the impact from certain non-recurring or non-comparable items.
Allows stockholders to compare operating performance among REITs over time on a consistent basis.
May significantly impact the trading price of a REIT’s common stock and, therefore, may significantly impact TSR. | |||
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre |
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre is a supplemental measure of our achievement of established debt targets and is adjusted to exclude the impact from certain non-recurring or non-comparable items.
Promotes a strong balance sheet and balances the Normalized FFO per share metric to discourage overleveraging.
Reflects the ability to generate sufficient earnings to meet debt obligations as the portfolio grows.
A strong balance sheet is also important for REITs to enable acquisition and investment opportunities. | |||
15% ESG Performance |
Corporate responsibility through environmental, social and governance
Measures the Company’s performance on various quantitative and qualitative ESG initiatives as described in detail in the ESG performance scorecard on page | |||
Individual Performance |
Assessment of individual contributions to the Company’s financial and operational performance, as well as accomplishments relative to annual objectives.
Strongly influenced by objective criteria, such as the quality of the Company’s portfolio and investments, including investment performance relative to underwriting or budget and other quantitative and qualitative performance metrics and trends as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Incentivizes and rewards individual initiative, achievements and contributions to ensure that executives are driving execution of our business strategy in their respective roles. | |||
The pre-established target-level performance hurdle for Normalized FFO per share was set at the mid-point of our initial public guidance for 2022 and excluded the positive impact of any funding we received during 2022 under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”).2023. The pre-established target-level performance hurdle for Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre was set in relation to our internally budgeted expectation, which is not publicly disclosed. The pre-established performance factors for ESG Performance, as further described below, was set in relation to internal strategic goals and key performance indicators, and taking external stockholder feedback into account.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 49 |
The Compensation Committee approved NEO 20222023 STIP award opportunities in January 2022,February 2023, following a review of compensation data for peers with substantially similar roles and responsibilities prepared by Ferguson Partners Consulting (as described below under “Compensation Policies and Practices—Peer Company Comparison”). The award opportunities reflect the Committee’s assessment of each NEO’s job position and responsibilities, experience, compensation peer group data and individual performance. Based on this assessment, the Committee determined to increase the 2023 STIP award opportunity for Mr. Patadia from $400,000 to $450,000 in connection with his promotion, but not to increase 20222023 STIP award opportunities for Messrs. Brinker, Scott, Klaritch Herzog and McHenry from the levels in effect for 2021.Bohn.
Mr. Bohn became a participant in the 2022 STIP and received an increase to his target-level bonus award opportunity in connection with his January 2022 promotion to Executive Vice President, from $363,500 to $450,000 (prorated from January 1, 2022 to the date of his promotion to Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of Life Science on October 6, 2022). In connection with Mr. Bohn’s October 2022 promotion, his 2022 STIP target-level award opportunity increased from $450,000 to $500,000 (prorated from his promotion date through December 31, 2022). Mr. Mabry did not participate in the 2022 STIP prior to his promotion in October 2022, and he received an increase to his pre-promotion 2022 bonus opportunity, from $441,000 in 2021 to $475,000 (prorated from January 1, 2022 to the date of his promotion to Chief Investment Officer on October 6, 2022). In connection with his promotion to Chief Investment Officer, he became eligible to participate in the 2022 STIP for the remainder of 2022, and his 2022 STIP opportunity was increased to $500,000 (prorated from his promotion date through December 31, 2022).
With respect to each of the performance metrics under the 20222023 STIP, reaching the threshold, target or high achievement level results in a payout of 50%, 100% or 150%, respectively, of the target-level award opportunity. Payout amounts between threshold, target and high levels are interpolated on a linear basis. No bonus is paid for metrics with outcomes below the threshold achievement level. The following table reflects the 20222023 STIP NEO award opportunities.
2023 STIP AWARD OPPORTUNITY ($) | ||||||
NAME | THRESHOLD (50%) | TARGET (100%) | HIGH (150%) | |||
Scott M. Brinker | 575,000 | 1,150,000 | 1,725,000 | |||
Peter A. Scott | 500,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 | |||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 450,000 | 900,000 | 1,350,000 | |||
Scott R. Bohn | 250,000 | 500,000 | 750,000 | |||
Ankit B. Patadia | 225,000 | 450,000 | 675,000 |
Financial Metrics (55% of Overall Award) | |||
1 | |||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2022 STIP AWARD OPPORTUNITY ($) | ||||||
NAME(1) | THRESHOLD (50%) | TARGET (100%) | HIGH (150%) | |||
Scott M. Brinker | 575,000 | 1,150,000 | 1,725,000 | |||
Peter A. Scott | 500,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 | |||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 450,000 | 900,000 | 1,350,000 | |||
Scott R. Bohn(2) | 221,442 | 442,885 | 664,326 | |||
Adam G. Mabry(3) | 59,615 | 119,231 | 178,846 | |||
Thomas M. Herzog | 1,150,000 | 2,300,000 | 3,450,000 |
2022 STIP Performance and Results
Financial Metrics (45% of Overall Award)
SOLIDSTRONG OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND BALANCE SHEET MANAGEMENT
The Compensation Committee sets executive compensation performance hurdles near the beginning of the performance period consistent with the Company’s strategic goals and in line with our publicly disclosed initial guidance for the performance year, as applicable, consistent with our past practice.
RELATIVE WEIGHTING | 2023 STIP PERFORMANCE METRIC | (50%) | (100%) | (150%) | THRESHOLD (50%) | TARGET (100%) | HIGH (150%) | OUTCOME (PAYOUT %) | |||||
Normalized FFO Per Share | $ | ||||||||||||
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre | |||||||||||||
Weighted Blended Overall Financial Performance Payout Percentage Relative to Target Level: | 150% |
(1) |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
ESG Performance Metric (15% of Overall Award)
STRONG COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY, PEOPLE-FIRST CULTURE AND LEADING GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Similar to 2021, the
The Compensation Committee established an ESG performance metric scorecard with both quantitative and qualitative ESG factors to link our NEOs’ incentive compensation to our ESG performance, underscoring the importance of ESG to our business and strategy.factors. The Committee selected primarily measurable ESG performance criteria that it determined to be rigorous yet achievable, focusing on criteria thatand which could be impacted by each NEO’s performance during the period, and were meaningful to the Company’s key ESG initiatives, including: transparent environmental disclosure and leading performance;green buildings, diversity equity and inclusion; employee satisfaction;well-being; and sound corporate governance. Factors were also identified based on key performance indicators in our ESG program.
ESG PERFORMANCE METRIC SCORECARD | ||||
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE COMPONENTS | POSSIBLE | EARNED | 2022 RESULTS | |
● Submit to at least 3 major reporting frameworks | 2 | 2 | Completed GRESB, CDP and S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment submissions Achieved industry-leading environmental performance results | |
● Publish annual ESG Report | 1 | 1 | Published 11th annual ESG Report according to GRI, TCFD and SASB frameworks Expanded key disclosures around physical climate risk, transition risk and ESG in new developments | |
● Receive prominent third-party recognition | 2 | 2 | ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year CDP Leadership Band, GRESB 4-Green Star Rating, DJSI N. America Index | |
● Qualitative review of environmental initiatives | 2 | 2 | Published inaugural green bond allocation report, reporting allocation of $938 million net proceeds to LEED Gold certified properties Received 2.5 bps reduction under revolving credit facility’s sustainability-linked pricing grid for annual GHG emissions reduction Obtained 65 new ENERGY STAR building certifications | |
● Maintain overall employee engagement score at/above Kingsley Index average (1 point) or 5% or higher above index average (2 points) | 2 | 2 | Achieved employee engagement score of at least 5% or higher above Kingsley Index average | |
● Advance gender and racial diversity initiatives | 2 | 2 | Launched several initiatives to enhance racial diversity and awareness through recruiting, training and outreach, including 61% gender or racially diverse workforce and 66% gender or racially diverse intern program Conducted company-wide inclusion and belonging training | |
● Receive prominent third party recognition for social and/or DEI initiatives | 1 | 1 | Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index Great Place to Work Certification Fortune Best Places to Work in Real Estate | |
● Qualitative review of human capital initiatives | 2 | 2 | Navigated team safety and provided work from home support Enhanced employee engagement initiatives | |
● Maintain average ISS Monthly Governance QualityScore of “4” (top 40%) (1 point) or “3” (top 30%) or better (2 points) | 2 | 2 | Average Score: 1.17 (top decile, improving from second decile in 2021) | |
● Obtain 95% or higher completion of annual employee Code of Conduct training | 2 | 2 | Over 95% completion | |
● Qualitative review of governance initiatives | 2 | 2 | Finalist for Best Proxy Statement and Best ESG Reporting by Corporate Secretary and IR Magazine Newsweek America’s Most Responsible Companies list Fortune Modern Board 25 list |
ESG PERFORMANCE METRIC SCORECARD
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE COMPONENTS | POSSIBLE | EARNED | 2023 RESULTS | |
• Submit to at least 3 major reporting frameworks | 2 | 2 | Completed GRESB, CDP and S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment submissions with enhanced disclosures | |
• Obtain LEED certification of Silver or Gold for all Lab developments completed during the year and eligible to receive certification | 1 | 1 | 2 LEED Gold certifications awarded; 2 LEED Gold certifications and 1 LEED Silver certification submitted in 2023 | |
• Develop a detailed and actionable sustainability strategy | 2 | 2 | Developed 10-year sustainability strategic roadmap, including decarbonization pathway and renewable energy strategy | |
• Qualitative review of environmental initiatives | 2 | 2 | ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year and 123 ENERGY STAR certifications obtained Received 2.5 bps reduction under revolving credit facility sustainability-linked pricing grid for annual GHG emissions reduction FTSE4Good Index; Forbes Net Zero Leaders list; USA Today America’s Climate Leaders list; GRESB Green Star recipient; Sustainability Yearbook | |
• Maintain overall employee engagement score at or above Kingsley Index (or successor) average (1 point) or 5% or higher above index average (2 points) | 2 | -- | – Postponed annual employee engagement survey in light of Physicians Realty Trust merger to allow for survey of combined company employees | |
• Advance gender and racial diversity initiatives, including in recruiting, hiring and succession planning, as well as the Board | 2 | 2 | 47% gender diverse and 37% racially diverse workforce (as of Oct. 2023) Sponsored 30 racially diverse university students | |
• Receive prominent third party recognition for social and/or diversity and inclusion initiatives | 1 | 1 | Fortune Best Workplaces in Real Estate; Certified Great Place to Work; Orange County Business Journal Great Place to Work; The Tennessean Top Workplaces; Middle Tennessee Top Workplace | |
• Qualitative review of human capital initiatives | 2 | 2 | 100% completion of workplace harassment prevention training Implementation of new performance evaluation system | |
• Maintain average ISS Monthly Governance Quality Score of “4” (top 40%) (1 point) or “3” (top 30%) or better (2 points) | 2 | 2 | Average Score: 1 (top decile performance) | |
• Obtain 95% or higher completion of annual employee Code of Conduct training | 2 | 2 | Over 95% completion | |
• Qualitative review of governance initiatives | 2 | 2 | Governance Intelligence Corporate Governance Awards Best Proxy Statement winner; finalist for Best ESG Reporting; Newsweek America’s Most Responsible Companies list; MSCI rating of “AA” | |
Total Points | 20 | 18 |
RELATIVE WEIGHTING | 2023 STIP PERFORMANCE METRIC | THRESHOLD | TARGET | HIGH | OUTCOME (PAYOUT %) | |||||
ESG Performance Metric | 18 points (150%) |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 51 |
Individual Performance (30% of Overall Award) | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
WEIGHTING | (PAYOUT %) | |||||||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Individual Performance (40% of Overall Award)
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE REFLECTS LEADERSHIP AND ACHIEVEMENT
The remaining 40%30% of the pre-established 20222023 STIP award was based on an assessment of individual performance. The Compensation Committee has discretion to award between 0% and 150% of each NEO’s target-level individual performance award opportunity. The Committee took into account each NEO’s individual accomplishments and leadership, as reflected in the following 20222023 performance scorecards, in determining each NEO’s individual performance award payout under the 20222023 STIP.
The Compensation Committee determined to award Messrs. Brinker, Scott, Klaritch, Bohn and Mabry the maximum (high) level (150%) for the
In determining individual performance, portion of the 2022 STIP award. In making award determinations, the Committee took into consideration each NEO’s individual contributions, as described in detail in each NEO’s individual performance scorecard below. The Committee also noted the NEOs’ overall contributions to factors that were especially important to the Company in 2022,2023, including driving operational performance and execution, managing balance sheet and liquidity, and continued strategic positioning in key markets.positioning.
Scott M. Brinker, | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | Individual Performance Scorecard | ||
• Oversaw the development of our updated business strategic plan in the summer of 2023 | • Led efforts for transformative strategic combination with Physicians Realty Trust • Spent extensive time developing senior leadership
| Individual Performance Payout: 150% of Target | |
Peter A. Scott, | |||
Chief Financial Officer | Individual Performance Scorecard | ||
• Developed flexible funding strategy, including execution of $750 million in bonds at a blended yield of 5.36% • Maintained strong balance sheet and financial results, including FFO as Adjusted and AFFO at the high end of original guidance |
• Maintained strong
| Individual Performance Payout:
145% of Target | |
Thomas M. Klaritch, | |||
Chief Operating Officer | Individual Performance Scorecard | ||
• Led efforts with tenants to maintain strong leasing, rent collections and occupancy in Outpatient Medical segment • Expanded sustainability initiatives in Outpatient Medical segment, including 77 LED lighting retrofit projects in tenant spaces and 123 ENERGY STAR certifications | • Met with health systems in top markets to identify and pursue relationship expansions • Oversaw process improvements, including capturing efficiencies of automation (i.e., budgeting and asset management) and new technologies (i.e., parking systems, fan wall systems) | Individual Performance Payout: 145% of Target | |
52 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Scott R. Bohn, | ||
Individual Performance Scorecard | ||
• Advanced Lab entitlement opportunities, including significant rezoning milestone for Alewife development in Cambridge, MA; and 1.3 million sq. ft. of entitlements for Vantage development in South San Francisco, CA • Led progress on major redevelopment campuses, including design, construction and leasing | • Led efforts for Lab lease executions of almost 1 million sq. ft. and maintained solid Lab results, including 2023 Same Store Cash (Adjusted) NOI growth at midpoint of original guidance • Oversaw sustainability initiatives within development and operating portfolio, including submitting for and/or achieving LEED Gold, WELL and Fitwel certifications | Individual Performance Payout: 130% of Target |
Ankit B. Patadia, | ||
Executive Vice President and Treasurer – Corporate Finance | Individual Performance Scorecard | |
• Supported flexible funding strategy, with $750 million in bonds at a blended yield of 5.36% • Utilized proceeds from bonds, dispositions and loan repayments to maintain leverage in the low 5x range and net floating rate debt exposure below 10% target | • Maintained BBB+/Baa1 credit ratings with stable outlook from S&P/Moody’s • Developed dynamic 3-year forecast process, enabling rolling updates to outer years for better planning and decision making | Individual Performance Payout: 145% of Target |
Overall 2023 STIP Results | |||||
4 | |||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
In accordance with the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, the Compensation Committee determined to pay Mr. Herzog the prorated individual portion of his 2022 STIP award at the target level. Mr. McHenry forfeited his 2022 STIP award opportunity in connection with his departure from the Company in November 2022.
Overall 2022 STIP Results
The following table summarizes the actual annual incentive awards paid to each NEO under the 20222023 STIP in February 20232024 based on the foregoing results and determinations.
NAME(1) | 2022 STIP OPPORTUNITY (AT TARGET) | (45%) ACTUAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE(2) | (15%) ACTUAL ESG PERFORMANCE(2) | (40%) ACTUAL INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE(3) | OVERALL WEIGHTED PAYOUT (%)(2) | TOTAL AWARD ($) | ||||||
Scott M. Brinker | $ 1,150,000 | 137.7% | 150% | 150% | 144.4% | $ 1,660,485 | ||||||
Peter A. Scott | $ 1,000,000 | 137.7% | 150% | 150% | 144.4% | $ 1,443,900 | ||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | $ 900,000 | 137.7% | 150% | 150% | 144.4% | $ 1,299,510 | ||||||
Scott R. Bohn | $ 442,885 | 137.7% | 150% | 150% | 144.4% | $ 639,481 | ||||||
Adam G. Mabry(3) | $ 119,231 | 137.7% | 150% | 150% | 144.4% | $ 172,157 | ||||||
Thomas M. Herzog(4) | $ 2,300,000 | 137.7% | 150% | 100% | 124.4% | $ 2,186,878 |
NAME | 2023 STIP OPPORTUNITY (AT TARGET) | (55%) ACTUAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE(1) | (15%) ACTUAL ESG PERFORMANCE(1) | (30%) ACTUAL INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE | OVERALL WEIGHTED PAYOUT (%) | TOTAL AWARD ($) | ||||||
Scott M. Brinker | $1,150,000 | 150% | 150% | 150% | 150% | $1,725,000 | ||||||
Peter A. Scott | $1,000,000 | 150% | 150% | 145% | 149% | $1,485,000 | ||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | $ 900,000 | 150% | 150% | 145% | 149% | $1,336,500 | ||||||
Scott R. Bohn | $ 500,000 | 150% | 150% | 130% | 144% | $ 720,000 | ||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | $ 450,000 | 150% | 150% | 145% | 149% | $ 668,250 |
(1) | |
As a percentage of the target level. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
All 20222023 equity awards were granted in the form of at-risk RSUsservice-based and PSUs.performance-based equity awards. We have not awarded stock options since 2014.
Our NEOs received long-term equity incentive awards under the 20222023 LTIP, which are subject to the achievement of performance metrics and vesting criteria established by the Compensation Committee near the beginning of the performance period. Executives could elect to receive long-term equity incentive awards in the form of restricted stock units or profits interest units (i.e., equity interests in our operating partnership, Healthpeak OP, LLC, intended to qualify as “profits interests” for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and convertible into shares of our common stock).
3-Year Relative TSR Performance-Based Award (PSUs)Awards (60%)
60% of | |
period (other than the settlement of shares in connection with applicable tax withholding). | |
The Compensation Committee selected a relative TSR performance metric as the basis for our performance-based LTIP awards because it allows stockholders to evaluate our performance compared to our peers and mitigates the impact of broad market trends that are not reflective of our actual performance. The Committee also determined to | |
a broader range of REITs. | |
Payout amounts between threshold or target, and target and high levels are interpolated. No value is paid for metrics with outcomes below the threshold achievement levels. |
RESULT | ||||
ABSOLUTE MEAN TSR PERFORMANCE HURDLES(3) | PAYOUT (% OF GRANT AT TARGET) | |||
Relative TSR PSU Award | 25% Below Peer Group Mean (Median)(3) | 0% | ||
Target | At Peer Group Mean (Median)(3) | 100% | ||
High | 25% or Higher Above Peer Group Mean | |||
(Median)(3) | ||||
(% OF GRANT AT TARGET) | ||||
(% OF GRANT AT TARGET) | ||||
200% |
(1) | |
(2) | |
(3) | Compared to the mean performance for the Healthcare REIT Peers and MSCI US REIT Index and median performance for the FTSE Nareit Equity Office Index. |
3-Year 2023 Retentive Award (RSUs) (40%)
The remaining 40% of the 20222023 LTIP award vestsawards are service-based awards that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. This portion of the 2022 LTIP wasdate, subject to achievement of a thresholdminimum Normalized FFO per share hurdle of $1.25$1.28 for the 20222023 performance year (“Retentive LTIP”). For Retentive LTIP awards granted to Messrs. Bohn and Mabry in October 2022 in connection with their promotions, the Normalized FFO per share performance hurdle was $1.60 for 2022. The Compensation Committee believes that the Retentive LTIP awards, which vest over time independent of TSR, promote the retention of our talented management team, while still incentivizing a focus on long-term results because the ultimate value of the RSUsRetentive LTIP awards is tied to our stock price.
54 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
20222023 LTIP Award Opportunities
Annual LTIP Awards
As described under “2022“2023 NEO Compensation,” the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Ferguson Partners Consulting, approved target-level 20222023 LTIP opportunities for the NEOs in early 2022,2023, as well as in connection with the promotionspromotion of Mr. Bohn and Mr. MabryPatadia in October 2022.February 2023. The award opportunities were based on the Committee’s assessment of peer compensation data prepared by Ferguson Partners Consulting (as described below under “Compensation Policies and Practices – Peer Company Comparison”), each NEO’s relative duties and responsibilities, and the NEO’s impact on Healthpeak’s results. Based on this assessment, the Committee determined to increase the 20222023 target-level LTIP award opportunities for Messrs. Brinker, Scott, Bohn and McHenry. Mr. Mabry did not participate in the 2022 LTIP. His 2022 pre-promotion time-based equity award opportunity increased from $262,558 to $330,064 in connection with increased duties as Senior Vice President of Investments in early 2022.each NEO.
The table below reflects the 20222023 LTIP award target-level values approved by the Compensation Committee.
NAME(1) | TSR-BASED LTIP Healthcare REIT Peers ($) | TSR-BASED LTIP FTSE Nareit Equity Office Index ($) | TSR-BASED LTIP S&P 500 REIT Index ($) | RETENTIVE LTIP ($) | TOTAL LTIP OPPORTUNITY ($)(2) | |||||
Scott M. Brinker | 1,190,060 | 297,560 | 297,380 | 1,190,000 | 2,975,000 | |||||
Peter A. Scott | 760,038 | 190,038 | 189,924 | 760,000 | 1,900,000 | |||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 600,030 | 150,030 | 149,940 | 600,000 | 1,500,000 | |||||
Scott R. Bohn | 170,009 | 42,509 | 42,482 | 170,000 | 425,000 | |||||
Thomas M. Herzog | 2,800,140 | 700,140 | 699,720 | 2,800,000 | 7,000,000 |
NAME(1) | TOTAL TARGET-LEVEL LTIP ($)(2) | |
Scott M. Brinker | 5,900,000 | |
Peter A. Scott | 2,350,000 | |
Thomas M. Klaritch | 1,750,000 | |
Scott R. Bohn | 1,000,000 | |
Ankit B. Patadia | 450,000 |
(1) | The table above does not reflect retentive LTIP |
(2) |
Promotion and Make-Whole
Retentive LTIP AwardsAward – Executive Promotion
In connection with the promotions of Messrs. Bohn and Mabry, theThe Compensation Committee granted each executiveMr. Patadia a one-time Retentive LTIP awards. One-time Retentiveaward with a grant value of $750,000 in connection with his promotion. A one-time retentive LTIP awards wereaward was determined to be preferable to relative TSR performance-based awardsaward to promote each executive’sMr. Patadia’s long-term retention, with a substantial portion of the Retentive LTIP awardsaward scheduled to vest over six years. Mr. Bohn was granted Retentive LTIP awards with an aggregate grant value of $1,000,000. The first Retentive LTIP award granted in April 2022 has a grant value of $750,000 and vests annually over six years, commencing on the second anniversary of the grant date, subject to achievement of a 20222023 Normalized FFO per share performance hurdle of $1.25. The second Retentive LTIP award granted in October 2022 is a make-whole equity compensation award to align his overall 2022 target-level equity compensation level with the intended level for Chief Development Officer and has a grant value of $250,000, vesting annually over three years, subject to achievement of a 2022 Normalized FFO per share performance hurdle of $1.60. Mr. Mabry was granted Retentive LTIP awards with an aggregate grant value of $1,000,000. The first Retentive LTIP award has a grant value of $750,000 and vests annually over six years commencing on the second anniversary of the grant date. The second Retentive LTIP award is a make-whole equity compensation award to align his overall 2022 target-level equity compensation level with the intended level for Chief Investment Officer and has a grant value of $250,000, vesting annually over three years. Both of Mr. Mabry’s Retentive LTIP awards are subject to achievement of a 2022 Normalized FFO per share performance hurdle of $1.60.$1.28.
Performance Results
The Company exceeded the Normalized FFO hurdle of at least $1.25$1.28 per share for the Retentive LTIP awards granted in February 2022, as well as the $1.60 hurdle with respect to the Retentive LTIP awards granted to Messrs. Bohn and Mabry in October 2022,2023, thereby satisfying the performance hurdle requirement for all Retentive LTIP awards. The Compensation Committee will make a determination regarding achievement of the TSR-Based LTIP performance criteria following the end of the performance period on December 31, 2024.
Table of Contents2025.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020-2022
In 2020,2021, we awarded the NEOs 3-year TSR-Based LTIP awards that had a performance period ending on December 31, 2022.2023. The following table summarizes the actual PSU payouts awarded to the NEOs under those awards. Award payouts were capped at 200%.
RELATIVE WEIGHTING | PERFORMANCE METRIC | THRESHOLD (50%) | TARGET (100%) | HIGH (200%) | OUTCOME / PAYOUT (%) | |||||||||
Relative TSR Performance | ||||||||||||||
Relative TSR Performance S&P 500 REIT Index | (0%) | |||||||||||||
Weighted Blended Overall Payout: |
(1) | Peers include Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated; Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.; Physicians Realty Trust; Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.; Ventas, Inc.; and Welltower Inc. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 55 |
TSR-BASED LTIP AWARD STATUS THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 20222023
(1) | The performance period for these awards remains open and the payout percentage for these awards has not been determined. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
20232024 Compensation Decisions
After reviewing the business strategy for 2023,2024, as well as various promotions,financial, operational and stock price performance, the Compensation Committee approved the following changes with respect to our executive compensation structure for 2023:2024:
No changes were made to base salary levels, target-level STIP award opportunities or target-level LTIP award opportunities for NEOs in 2024.
2023 STIP
The performance metrics and weightings are consistent with the | |
• | In addition to payout levels at Threshold (50%), Target (100%) and High (150%), an Outperformance payout level (200%) was added, consistent with the majority of annual incentive programs for executive officers at the |
2023
2024 LTIP
The | |
• | To better align with peer company practices, we added a non-TSR performance metric, Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre, to the performance-based LTIP award, noting that the relative TSR performance metric remains the primary metric for the performance-based LTIP awards. |
56 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Policies and Practices
Compensation Risk Assessment | We believe that any risks arising from our compensation program are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us for the reasons outlined below. Base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage inappropriate or excessive risk taking. Our incentive compensation balances quantitative and qualitative performance assessments. While the STIP, our annual cash incentive plan, focuses on annual goals, we cap awards under the plan. The Compensation Committee believes that the STIP appropriately balances risk and the desire to focus executives on specific annual goals important to our success. A substantial portion of our executive officers’ compensation is in the form of equity awards to further align executive and stockholder interests. The Compensation Committee believes that the LTIP awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because the ultimate value of the awards is tied to our performance and stock price, and because the awards are subject to long-term vesting schedules based on forward-looking performance goals. Additionally, our stock ownership guidelines, in addition to the 1-year post-vesting holding requirement for LTIP awards, help ensure that executives have significant value tied to our performance. Furthermore, as discussed below, our executive officers are subject to a clawback policy, which permits us to recover incentive compensation received by such officers in the event the amount of the payment or award was determined based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with a financial reporting requirement under securities laws. | |
Policy Regarding Executive Employment Agreements | Our Executive Severance Plan and Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (the “CIC Plan”) (as both are further described under “Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control Severance Arrangements” below) provide severance protections without the use of individual employment agreements with our executive officers. Our severance plans, which operate in lieu of individual contractual arrangements, provide standardized severance benefits for our executives. Our general policy against executive employment agreements also eliminates guaranteed base salaries and incentive levels, which allows the Company to focus on pay for performance and other factors that the Compensation Committee deems relevant in setting executive compensation, without contractual restrictions. | |
Compensation Consultant | The Compensation Committee is authorized to retain independent counsel, compensation and benefits consultants, and other outside experts or advisors. Since November 2008, the Committee has retained Ferguson Partners Consulting as its outside independent compensation consultant. For Ferguson Partners Consulting reports directly to the Compensation Committee and works with management as directed by the Committee. During | |
Management Succession Planning | Our Board is responsible for attracting, retaining and incentivizing a high-performing management team. With the assistance of the Compensation Committee, Board reviews management development and our succession plan to help ensure that top management positions, including the CEO position, can be filled without undue interruption. High-potential leaders, including emerging diverse leaders, are given exposure and visibility to Board members through formal presentations at Board and committee meetings, as well as through informal events. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 57 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Peer Group | In developing our |
The companies in our | ||
• Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | ||
• Realty Income Corporation | ||
• Regency Centers Corporation | ||
• UDR, Inc. | ||
• Ventas, Inc. | ||
• Vornado Realty Trust | ||
•
|
Peer Company Comparison | The | |
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2023* | ||
(in billions)
| ||
* Source: KeyBanc for Enterprise Value; S&P Global for Market Capitalization. |
Compensation Assessment | In early | |
58 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Stock Ownership Guidelines | The Compensation Committee believes that ownership of Healthpeak securities promotes our executives’ focus on our long-term business objectives. Our stock ownership guidelines, |
EXECUTIVE | |||
STOCK OWNERSHIP AS MULTIPLE OF BASE SALARY | |||
CEO | 10x | ||
Other NEOs | 6x | ||
Executive Officers (Non-NEOs) | 3x |
| |||
Clawback Policy | |||
Anti-Hedging Policy | Our Board recognizes that hedging against losses in Healthpeak securities may disturb the alignment between the interests of our officers and directors and those of our other stockholders. For this reason, directors, officers and other employees (and if applicable, their family members) are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of Healthpeak securities. | ||
Anti-Pledging Policy | Our Board recognizes that a forced margin sale or foreclosure sale of Healthpeak securities may negatively impact our stock price or violate our insider trading policy. Accordingly, our Board adopted a policy that prohibits directors, officers and other employees (and if applicable, their family members) from holding Healthpeak securities in a margin account or pledging Healthpeak securities as collateral for a loan. | ||
No Tax Gross Up Payments | None of our NEOs are entitled to tax gross-up payments on severance benefits or in the event they are subject to excise taxes imposed under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) as a result of a change in control of the company. | ||
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation | Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the deductibility of compensation paid to our current and former executive officers that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Jobs Act”) made substantial changes to Section 162(m) of the Code. Pursuant to the Jobs Act, certain awards granted before November 2, 2017, that were based upon attaining pre-established performance measures that were set by the Compensation Committee under a plan approved by our stockholders, as well as amounts payable to former executives pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017, may qualify for an exception to the $1 million deductibility limit. As one of the factors in its consideration of compensation matters, the Compensation Committee notes this deductibility limitation. However, the Committee generally has the flexibility to take any compensation-related actions that it determines are in the Company’s and its stockholders’ best interest, including designing and awarding compensation for our executive officers that is not fully deductible for tax purposes. In addition, we qualify as a REIT under the Code and are not subject to federal income taxes, meaning that the payment of compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) does not have a material adverse consequence to us as long as we qualify as a REIT under the Code. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any compensation will in fact be deductible. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 59 |
Summary Compensation Table—20222023
The Summary Compensation Table below quantifies the value of the different forms of compensation earned by or awarded to our NEOs for 2023, 2022 2021 and 2020,2021, in the manner and format required under applicable SEC rules.
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION(S) | YEAR | SALARY | BONUS | STOCK | OPTION AWARDS ($) | NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN COMPENSATION ($)(2) | CHANGE IN | ALL OTHER | TOTAL | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 2022 | 750,000 | — | 3,134,399 | — | 1,660,485 | — | 12,200 | 5,557,084 | |||||||||
2021 | 750,000 | — | 2,663,454 | — | 1,725,000 | — | 11,600 | 5,150,054 | ||||||||||
2020 | 750,000 | 296,119 | 2,637,958 | — | 796,381 | — | 11,400 | 4,491,858 | ||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 2022 | 650,000 | — | 2,001,834 | — | 1,443,900 | — | 12,200 | 4,107,934 | |||||||||
2021 | 650,000 | — | 1,623,499 | — | 1,500,000 | — | 11,600 | 3,785,099 | ||||||||||
2020 | 650,000 | 257,495 | 1,835,049 | — | 692,505 | — | 11,400 | 3,446,449 | ||||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 2022 | 600,000 | — | 1,580,387 | — | 1,299,510 | — | 12,200 | 3,492,097 | |||||||||
2021 | 600,000 | — | 1,522,041 | — | 1,350,000 | — | 11,600 | 3,483,641 | ||||||||||
2020 | 600,000 | 231,745 | 1,720,409 | — | 623,255 | — | 11,400 | 3,186,809 | ||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 2022 | 461,875 | — | 1,447,966 | — | 639,481 | — | 12,200 | 2,561,522 | |||||||||
Adam G. Mabry | 2022 | 469,500 | 361,731 | (4) | 1,330,150 | — | 172,157 | — | 12,200 | 2,345,738 | ||||||||
Thomas M. Herzog | 2022 | 881,667 | — | 7,374,832 | — | 2,186,878 | — | 13,865,228 | 24,308,605 | |||||||||
2021 | 1,150,000 | — | 7,102,283 | — | 3,450,000 | — | 11,600 | 11,713,883 | ||||||||||
2020 | 1,150,000 | 592,239 | 8,028,215 | — | 1,592,761 | — | 11,400 | 11,374,615 | ||||||||||
Troy E. McHenry | 2022 | 502,273 | — | 1,317,046 | — | — | — | 2,012,200 | 3,831,519 | |||||||||
2021 | 600,000 | — | 1,065,383 | — | 975,000 | — | 11,600 | 2,651,983 | ||||||||||
2020 | 600,000 | 167,372 | 1,204,362 | — | 450,128 | — | 11,400 | 2,433,262 |
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION(S) | YEAR | SALARY ($) | BONUS ($) | STOCK AWARDS ($)(1) | OPTION AWARDS ($) | NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN COMPENSATION ($) | CHANGE IN PENSION VALUE AND NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS ($) | ALL OTHER COMPENSATION ($)(2) | TOTAL ($) | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 2023 | 750,000 | — | 5,204,310 | — | 1,725,000 | — | 13,200 | 7,692,510 | |||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | 750,000 | — | 3,134,399 | — | 1,660,485 | — | 12,200 | 5,557,084 | |||||||||
2021 | 750,000 | — | 2,663,454 | — | 1,725,000 | — | 11,600 | 5,150,054 | ||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 2023 | 650,000 | — | 2,072,983 | — | 1,485,000 | — | 13,200 | 4,221,183 | |||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | 650,000 | — | 2,001,834 | — | 1,443,900 | — | 12,200 | 4,107,934 | |||||||||
2021 | 650,000 | — | 1,623,499 | — | 1,500,000 | — | 11,600 | 3,785,099 | ||||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 2023 | 600,000 | — | 1,543,731 | — | 1,336,500 | — | 13,200 | 3,493,431 | |||||||||
Chief Operating Officer | 2022 | 600,000 | — | 1,580,387 | — | 1,299,510 | — | 12,200 | 3,492,097 | |||||||||
2021 | 600,000 | — | 1,522,041 | — | 1,350,000 | — | 11,600 | 3,483,641 | ||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 2023 | 525,000 | — | 882,148 | — | 720,000 | — | 13,200 | 2,141,502 | |||||||||
Chief Development Officer and Head of Lab | 2022 | 461,875 | — | 1,447,966 | — | 639,481 | — | 12,200 | 2,561,522 | |||||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 2023 | 425,000 | — | 1,051,236 | — | 668,250 | — | 13,200 | 2,157,686 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President and Treasurer – Corporate Finance |
(1) | The amounts reported in column (e) for each fiscal year reflect the fair value on the grant date of the |
2023 ($) | 2022 ($) | 2021 ($) | |||||||||||
NAME | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | |||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 3,145,946 | 7,080,077 | 1,944,335 | 3,570,162 | 1,613,382 | 3,150,063 | |||||||
Peter A. Scott | 1,253,086 | 2,820,121 | 1,241,818 | 2,280,210 | 983,412 | 1,920,075 | |||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 933,153 | 2,100,099 | 980,384 | 1,800,169 | 921,960 | 1,800,089 | |||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 533,237 | 1,200,071 | 277,832 | 510,152 | — | — | |||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 239,973 | 540,069 | — | — | — | — |
(2) | The 2023 amounts reported in column (i) reflect a 401(k) Plan matching contribution of $13,200 made on behalf of each NEO in accordance with the terms of our 401(k) Plan. |
60 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Executive Compensation Tables
than the Monte Carlo valuation for the 2021 PSU awards due, in part, to the higher common stock closing price on the 2022 grant date as compared to 2021 grant date. Under the terms of the PSU awards, between 0% and 200% of the target-level number of shares subject to the awards may vest based on performance for the applicable performance period. The following table presents the grant date fair values of PSUs (i) determined under the principles used to calculate the grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of our consolidated financial statements using the Monte Carlo simulation, and (ii) assuming that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved using our closing stock price on the grant date, without regard to the Monte Carlo simulation): | |||||||||||||
2022 ($) | 2021 ($) | 2020 ($) | |||||||||||
NAME | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION) | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE (BASED ON MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE) | |||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 1,944,335 | 3,570,162 | 1,613,382 | 3,150,063 | 1,717,894 | 2,760,119 | |||||||
Peter A. Scott | 1,241,818 | 2,280,210 | 983,412 | 1,920,075 | 1,414,862 | 1,920,047 | |||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 980,384 | 1,800,169 | 921,960 | 1,800,089 | 1,120,353 | 1,800,058 | |||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 277,832 | 510,152 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Adam G. Mabry | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Thomas M. Herzog | 4,574,787 | 8,400,166 | 4,302,275 | 8,400,024 | 5,228,174 | 8,400,048 | |||||||
Troy E. McHenry | 817,028 | 1,500,216 | 645,372 | 1,260,062 | 784,289 | 1,260,108 | |||||||
(2) | As described under “—2022 NEO Compensation—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” in our CD&A, each of our current NEOs received an annual cash incentive award for 2022 under the 2022 STIP, which, in each case, is reported in column (g). Reflects prorated target-level annual cash incentive for Mr. Herzog paid pursuant to his release agreement. Mr. McHenry forfeited his 2022 STIP in connection with his departure from the Company on November 1, 2022. | ||||||||||||
(3) | The 2022 amounts reported in column (i) reflect a 401(k) Plan matching contribution of $12,200 made on behalf of each NEO in accordance with the terms of our 401(k) Plan. With respect to Mr. Herzog, also reflects $13,853,028 in severance payments as described under “Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control—Severance Arrangements.” With respect to Mr. McHenry, also reflects $2,000,000 pursuant to the terms of his negotiated release payment as described under “Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control—Severance Arrangements.” | ||||||||||||
(4) | Represents Mr. Mabry’s pre-promotion prorated bonus payable under our non-executive employee bonus program prior to his participation in the 2022 STIP. |
Executive Compensation Tables
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 20222023
The following table presents information regarding the incentive awards granted to our NEOs during 2022,2023, in the manner and format required under applicable SEC rules.
ALL OTHER AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCK AWARDS: NUMBER OF SHARES OF STOCK OR UNITS (#) | OPTION AWARDS: NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING | GRANT STOCK AND OPTION | ||||||||||||||||||||
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS | ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | �� | GRANT DATE | THRESHOLD ($) | TARGET ($) | MAXIMUM ($) | THRESHOLD (#) | TARGET (#) | MAXIMUM (#) | ||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (k) | ||||||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | Annual Incentive | — | 575,000 | 1,150,000 | 1,725,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36,993 | — | 1,190,065 | ||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | 27,745 | 55,489 | 110,978 | — | — | 1,944,335 | ||||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | Annual Incentive | — | 500,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,625 | — | 760,016 | ||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | 17,720 | 35,440 | 70,880 | — | — | 1,241,818 | ||||||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | Annual Incentive | — | 450,000 | 900,000 | 1,350,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,651 | — | 600,003 | ||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | 13,990 | 27,979 | 55,958 | — | — | 980,384 | ||||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | Annual Incentive | — | 221,443 | 442,885 | 664,328 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | 5,286 | 170,051 | |||||||||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | 3,965 | 7,929 | 15,858 | 277,832 | |||||||||||||||||
Retentive | 4/28/2022 | 21,905 | 750,027 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retentive | 10/26/2022 | 10,872 | 250,056 | |||||||||||||||||||
Adam G. Mabry | Annual Incentive | — | 421,347 | 480,962 | 540,578 | |||||||||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | 10,260 | 330,064 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retentive | 10/26/2022 | 32,610 | 750,030 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retentive | 10/26/2022 | 10,872 | 250,056 | |||||||||||||||||||
Thomas M. Herzog | Annual Incentive | — | 1,150,000 | 2,300,000 | 3,450,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 87,039 | — | 2,800,045 | ||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | 65,280 | 130,559 | 261,118 | — | — | 4,574,787 | ||||||||||||
Troy E. McHenry(2) | Annual Incentive | — | 325,000 | 650,000 | 975,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
LTIP RSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15,543 | — | 500,018 | ||||||||||||
LTIP PSU | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | 11,659 | 23,317 | 46,634 | — | — | 817,028 |
ALL OTHER AWARDS(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS | ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS(1) | STOCK AWARDS: NUMBER OF SHARES OF STOCK | OPTION AWARDS: NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING | GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE OF STOCK AND OPTION | ||||||||||||||||||
NAME | GRANT DATE | THRESHOLD ($) | TARGET ($) | MAXIMUM ($) | THRESHOLD (#) | TARGET (#) | MAXIMUM (#) | OR UNITS (#) | OPTIONS (#) | AWARDS ($)(2) | ||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (k) | ||||||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | Annual Incentive | — | 575,000 | 1,150,000 | 1,725,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 90,597 | — | 2,360,052 | ||||||||||||
TSR- Based | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | 84,934 | 169,868 | 339,735 | — | — | 3,540,039 | ||||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | Annual Incentive | — | 500,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36,087 | — | 819,897 | ||||||||||||
TSR- Based | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | 33,831 | 67,661 | 135,323 | — | — | 1,253,086 | ||||||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | Annual Incentive | — | 450,000 | 900,000 | 1,350,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26,874 | — | 700,068 | ||||||||||||
TSR- Based | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | 25,193 | 50,386 | 100,773 | — | — | 1,050,049 | ||||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | Annual Incentive | — | 250,000 | 500,000 | 750,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | 15,357 | 348,911 | |||||||||||||||||||
TSR- Based | 2/15/2023 | 14,396 | 28,793 | 57,585 | 533,237 | |||||||||||||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | Annual Incentive | — | 225,000 | 450,000 | 675,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,912 | — | 157,041 | ||||||||||||
TSR- Based | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | 6,479 | 12,958 | 25,915 | — | — | 239,973 | ||||||||||||
Retentive | 2/15/2023 | 28,795 | 654,222 |
(1) | Replacement Awards granted to NEOs in connection with the conversion of restricted stock units into profits interest units did not result in incremental fair value (within the meaning of FASB ASC Topic 718) with respect to any such Replacement Award, and therefore the Replacement Awards are not reflected in this table. |
(2) | The amounts reported in column (k) of the table above have been determined under the principles used to calculate the grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of our consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to value the awards reported in column (k), see the discussion of stock awards contained in Note |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | |
Executive Compensation Tables
Description of Plan-Based Awards
2014 Plan
All 20222023 awards reported in the above table were granted under, and are subject to, the Amended and Restated Performance Incentive Plan, or the 2014 Plan. Following approval of the 2023 Performance Incentive Plan, which was approvedor 2023 Plan, by our stockholders on May 1,April 27, 2023, no new awards may be granted under the 2014 as amended from time to time.Plan. The Compensation Committee administers the 2014 Planand 2023 Plans and has the authority to interpret its provisions and make all required determinations thereunder.
Our NEOs’ 20222023 non-equity (cash) incentive awards reported in the above table are described under “2022“2023 NEO Compensation—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” in our CD&A.
The Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 20222023 table above reflects the PSUTSR-Based and RSURetentive LTIP awards granted to our eligible NEOs, as described under “2022“2023 NEO Compensation—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” in our CD&A. Each PSU and RSUTSR-Based or Retentive LTIP Award represents (i) with respect to awards comprised of restricted stock units, a contractual right to receive one share of our common stock, subject to the applicable time-based and performance-based vesting requirements.requirements, and (ii) with respect to awards comprised of profits interest units, the right to receive equity interests in our operating partnership, Healthpeak OP, LLC, intended to qualify as “profits interests” for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and convertible into shares of our common stock.
In connection with our corporate reorganization into a holding company structure commonly referred to as an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust, or UPREIT, in February 2023, each NEO elected to convert certain of their outstanding LTIP awards granted to them prior to 2023 into profits interest units (“Replacement Awards”). Each Replacement Award has equivalent target value, performance conditions (if applicable), vesting schedule and other terms and conditions as the original award. Such Replacement Awards did not result in any incremental fair value within the meaning of FASB ASC Topic 718.
The PSUs3-year TSR-Based LTIP awards granted in respect of the 2022 3-Year LTIP2023 cliff vest, if at all, subject to the achievement of performance criteria (based on forward-looking relative TSR) over a performance period from January 1, 2022,2023, through December 31, 2024,2025, subject to a 1-year post-vesting holding requirement (other than the settlement of shares in connection with applicable tax withholding) to promote retention and further align executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders. This 1-year holding requirement will lapse upon death, disability or disability.a qualifying retirement. A qualifying retirement occurs if an NEO voluntary retires from service on or after the date on which the NEO’s age plus total years of service equals at least 70, the NEO has attained at least 55 years of age, and the NEO has completed at least five years of service with the Company. If the employment of an NEO terminates due to death or disability, or if Healthpeak terminates an NEO without cause, the NEO’s PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards will remain outstanding during the performance period and the eligible NEO will receive the number of units earned, if any, had the NEO remained employed with the Company until the end of the performance period. If the employment of an NEO terminates due to a qualifying retirement, the NEO’s TSR-Based LTIP Awards will remain outstanding during the performance period and the eligible NEO will receive the number of units earned, if any, had the NEO remained employed with the Company until the end of the performance period, prorated based on the NEO’s days of service during the performance period. For each NEO, if there is a change in control of Healthpeak during the performance period, the performance period for the PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Award will be shortened and performance will be determined based on such shortened period and the number of PSUsunits underlying the award deemed to have vested based on such shortened period will accelerate and vest in connection with the change in control.
RSUsRetentive LTIP Awards granted in respect of the annual 2022 Retentive2023 LTIP vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to a performance hurdle related to Normalized FFO per share for the 20222023 performance period of $1.25,$1.28, which was exceeded. The awards are also subject to a 1-year post-vesting holding requirement (other than the settlement of shares in connection with applicable tax withholding) to promote retention and further align executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders. This 1-year holding requirement will lapse upon death, disability or disability.a qualifying retirement. If an NEO’s employment terminates due to death, disability or disability,a qualifying retirement, if Healthpeak terminates an NEO without cause (whether before or after a change in control of Healthpeak), or if an NEO terminates employment for good reason following(whether before or after a change in control of Healthpeak,Healthpeak), the NEO’s RSUsretentive awards will fully vest as of the severance date.date (with respect to a qualifying retirement, only if the one-year performance hurdle has been achieved as of the severance date). If a change in control of Healthpeak occurs and outstanding equity awards are to be terminated in connection with the transaction and not assumed or continued by an acquiring entity, then the outstanding RSUsRetentive LTIP Awards will fully vest in connection with such change in control. Please alsoAlso see the description under “2022“2023 NEO Compensation—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” with respect to promotion Retentive LTIP awardsAward granted to Messrs. Bohn and Mabry with a Normalized FFO per share hurdle of $1.60, andMr. Patadia, which vestvests over six years and three years.
62 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Vested RSUsRetentive and PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards are payable in an equal number of shares of our common stock.stock, or if elected by the holder, profits interest units. Payment will generally be made as the units vest.award vests. The NEO does not have the right to vote or dispose of the units or interests underlying the award, but does have the right to receive dividend equivalents in the form of cash payments (for Retentive LTIP Awards) based on the amount of dividends paid by Healthpeak during the term of the award on a number of shares equal to the number of outstanding and unpaid units then subject to the award. Such payments are made concurrently with the related dividends paid to our stockholders. However, dividend equivalents that would otherwise be paid during the applicable performance period with respect to the 2022 3-Year TSR-Based LTIP PSUsAwards will instead accrue and be paid at the end of the performance period based on the number of units actually earned if the related threshold performance requirement for the award is satisfied (and forfeited in whole if the related threshold performance goal is not satisfied).
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20222023
The following table presents, in the manner and format required under applicable SEC rules, information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by each of our NEOs at December 31, 2022. Mr. McHenry forfeited all outstanding equity awards in connection with his departure from the Company on November 1, 2022.2023.
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | AWARD GRANT DATE | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS EXERCISABLE (#) | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS UNEXERCISABLE (#) | OPTION EXERCISE PRICE ($) | OPTION EXPIRATION DATE | NUMBER OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#) | MARKET VALUE OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: MARKET OR PAYOUT VALUE OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | |||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | ||||||||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 36,993 | (2) | 927,415 | — | — | ||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 110,978 | (3) | 2,782,218 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 22,626 | (4) | 567,234 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33,937 | (5) | 850,801 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,485 | (6) | 212,706 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | 8,220 | (7) | 206,075 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34,202 | (8) | 857,445 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,165 | (9) | 154,557 | |||||||||||||
3/1/2018 | — | — | — | 91,200 | (10) | 2,286,384 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 23,625 | (2) | 592,279 | — | — | ||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 70,880 | (3) | 1,776,962 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 13,792 | (4) | 345,765 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20,686 | (5) | 518,598 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,172 | (6) | 129,650 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | 5,718 | (7) | 143,350 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,793 | (8) | 596,480 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,289 | (9) | 107,513 | |||||||||||||
5/15/2017 | — | — | — | — | 16,078 | (11) | 403,075 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 18,651 | (2) | 467,581 | — | — | ||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 55,958 | (3) | 1,402,867 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 12,930 | (4) | 324,155 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19,393 | (5) | 486,183 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,849 | (6) | 121,552 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | 5,361 | (7) | 134,400 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22,306 | (8) | 559,205 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,021 | (9) | 100,794 | |||||||||||||
2/3/2014 | 31,759 | — | 33.79 | 2/3/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
1/28/2013 | 18,293 | — | 40.83 | 1/28/2023 | — | — | — | — |
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||
NAME | AWARD GRANT DATE | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS EXERCISABLE (#) | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS UNEXERCISABLE (#) | OPTION EXERCISE PRICE ($) | OPTION EXPIRATION DATE | NUMBER OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#)(1) | MARKET VALUE OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#)(1) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: MARKET OR PAYOUT VALUE OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | ||||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 90,597 | (2) | 1,793,821 | — | — | ||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 169,868 | (3) | 3,363,386 | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 24,662 | (4) | 488,308 | — | — | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 69,362 | (5) | 1,373,368 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 11,313 | (6) | 223,997 | — | — | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,790 | (7) | 134,442 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (8) | — | |||||||||
3/1/2018 | — | — | — | — | 45,600 | (9) | 902,880 | — | — | |||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 36,087 | (2) | 714,523 | — | — | ||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67,662 | (3) | 1,339,708 | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 15,750 | (10) | 311,850 | — | — | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44,300 | (5) | 877,140 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 6,896 | (11) | 136,541 | — | — | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,139 | (7) | 81,952 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (8) | — | |||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 26,874 | (2) | 532,105 | — | — | ||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50,387 | (3) | 997,663 | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 12,434 | (10) | 246,193 | — | — | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34,974 | (5) | 692,485 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 6,465 | (11) | 128,007 | — | — | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,881 | (7) | 76,844 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (8) | — | |||||||||
2/3/2014 | 31,759 | — | 33.79 | 2/3/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 15,357 | (2) | 304,069 | — | — | ||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28,793 | (3) | 570,101 | |||||||||
10/26/2022 | — | — | — | — | 7,248 | (12) | 143,510 | — | — | |||||||||
4/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | 21,905 | (13) | 433,719 | — | — | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 3,524 | (10) | 69,775 | — | — | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,912 | (5) | 196,258 | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 4,398 | (6) | 87,080 | — | — | |||||||||
2/3/2014 | 1,814 | — | 33.79 | 2/3/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 6,912 | (2) | 136,858 | — | — | ||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | 28,795 | (14) | 570,141 | — | — | |||||||||
2/15/2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,958 | (3) | 256,559 | |||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 6,218 | (10) | 123,116 | — | — | |||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 2,155 | (11) | 42,669 | — | — |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 63 |
Executive Compensation Tables
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | AWARD GRANT DATE | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS EXERCISABLE (#) | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS UNEXERCISABLE (#) | OPTION EXERCISE PRICE ($) | OPTION EXPIRATION DATE | NUMBER OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#) | MARKET VALUE OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#) | EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: MARKET OR PAYOUT VALUE OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)(1) | |||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | ||||||||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 10/26/2022 | — | — | — | — | 10,872 | (12) | 272,561 | — | — | ||||||||||||
4/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | 21,905 | (13) | 549,158 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 5,286 | (2) | 132,520 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15,858 | (3) | 397,560 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 8,796 | (4) | 220,516 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | 1,653 | (7) | 41,441 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/3/2014 | 1,814 | — | 33.79 | 2/3/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Adam G. Mabry | 10/26/2022 | — | — | — | — | 32,610 | (14) | 817,533 | — | — | ||||||||||||
10/26/2022 | — | — | — | — | 10,872 | (15) | 272,561 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 10,260 | (2) | 257,218 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 5,658 | (4) | 141,846 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2021 | — | — | — | — | 2,234 | (7) | 56,006 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Thomas M. Herzog | 2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 87,039 | (2) | 2,182,068 | — | — | ||||||||||||
2/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 261,118 | (3) | 6,546,228 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | 60,332 | (4) | 1,512,523 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 90,498 | (5) | 567,196 | |||||||||||||
2/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22,625 | (6) | 567,196 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | 25,016 | (7) | 627,151 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 104,090 | (8) | 2,609,541 | |||||||||||||
2/14/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,762 | (9) | 470,363 |
Back to Contents |
(1) | The number of shares or units reported in column (f) reflect time-vested |
(2) | The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in three equal installments on February 15, 2024, 2025 and 2026. |
(3) | Subject to the satisfaction of applicable performance criteria, the unvested portion of this award is scheduled to vest upon certification of the performance results by the Compensation Committee following the performance period ending December 31, 2025. The number of shares reported is based on the achievement at the target payout level, based on performance tracking between the threshold and target payout levels as of December 31, 2023. |
(4) | The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in two equal installments on February 10, |
(5) | |
This award was originally granted to the NEO on February 10, 2022 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. Subject to the satisfaction of applicable performance criteria, the unvested portion of this award is scheduled to vest upon certification of the performance results by the Compensation Committee following the performance period ending December 31, 2024. The number of shares reported is based on the achievement at the | |
(6) | |
The unvested portion of this award vested on February |
12, 2024. | |
Executive Compensation Tables
This award was originally granted to the NEO on February 12, 2021 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portion of this award vested upon certification of the performance results by the Compensation Committee following the performance period | |
This award was originally granted to the NEO on February 12, 2021 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portion of this award vested upon certification of the performance results by the Compensation Committee following the performance period | |
(9) | This award was originally granted to the NEO on March 1, 2018 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portions of this award vested on March 1, 2024. |
(10) | This award was originally granted to the NEO on February 10, 2022 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in two equal installments on |
2025. | |
(11) | This award was originally granted to the NEO on February 12, 2021 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portion of this award |
February 12, 2024. | |
(12) | This award was originally granted to the NEO on October 26, 2022 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in |
(13) | This award was originally granted to the NEO on April 28, 2022 and was converted into a Replacement Award on February 15, 2023. The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in five equal installments on April 28, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028. |
(14) | The unvested portions of this award are scheduled to vest in five equal installments on |
The following table presents information regarding the exercise of stock options by NEOs during 20222023 and the vesting of other stockequity awards during 2022.2023.
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||
NAME | NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE (#) | VALUE REALIZED ON EXERCISE ($) | NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING (#) | VALUE REALIZED ON VESTING ($)(1) | ||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | ||||
Scott M. Brinker | — | — | 127,908 | 4,170,780 | ||||
Peter A. Scott | — | — | 82,501 | 2,723,249 | ||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | — | — | 65,635 | 2,214,177 | ||||
Scott R. Bohn | — | — | 7,673 | 247,599 | ||||
Adam G. Mabry | — | — | 6,901 | 222,237 | ||||
Thomas M. Herzog | — | — | 252,472 | 8,500,007 | ||||
Troy E. McHenry | — | — | 49,342 | 1,584,504 |
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK/EQUITY AWARDS | |||||||
NAME | NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE (#) | VALUE REALIZED ON EXERCISE ($) | NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING (#) | VALUE REALIZED ON VESTING ($)(1) | ||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | ||||
Scott M. Brinker | — | — | 117,432 | 3,052,096 | ||||
Peter A. Scott | — | — | 64,649 | 1,671,829 | ||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | — | — | 44,370 | 1,220,641 | ||||
Scott R. Bohn | — | — | 11,437 | 286,724 | ||||
Ankit B. Patadia | — | — | 6,917 | 183,217 |
(1) | The dollar amount shown in column (e) above for stock awards is determined by multiplying the number of shares or profits interest units, as applicable, that vested by the per share closing price of Healthpeak common stock on the vesting date (or if |
64 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Executive Compensation Tables
Potential Payments Upon a Termination or Change in Control
The following section describes the benefits that may become payable to our NEOs in connection with a termination of their employment with Healthpeak and/or a change in control of Healthpeak. You should read this section in combination with “Description of Plan-Based Awards—Equity Incentive Awards” above, which describes the treatment of outstanding equity-based awards held by our NEOs upon a termination or change in control of Healthpeak.
Executive Severance Plan
We provide competitive severance benefits to attract and retain key employees with outstanding talent and ability. The Compensation Committee determined that the adoption of the Executive Severance Plan (“Severance Plan”) in lieu of entering into individual employment agreements with our executives was consistent with compensation best practices. Severance benefits are appropriate in light of severance protections available to executives at our peer group companies and are an important component of each executive’s overall compensation as they help us to attract and retain our key executives who could have other job alternatives that may appear to them to be more attractive absent these protections. See “Compensation Policies and Practices—Policy Regarding Executive Employment Agreements” in our CD&A.
The Severance Plan is intended to provide severance benefits to employees who are selected by the Compensation Committee to participate, including each NEO, upon a termination of employment by us without “cause” or by the NEO for “good reason” (each as defined in the Severance Plan, as such definitions may be amended from time to time) other than in circumstances in which the participant would receive benefits under the CIC Plan (described under “—Executive Change in Control Severance Plan” below), as set forth below. An NEO’s right to receive benefits under the Severance Plan is subject to his or her execution of a general release of claims against us, and his or her agreement to post-termination confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition restrictive covenants, as applicable. Payments (or benefits payable) to an NEO under the Severance Plan will, to the extent applicable, either be reduced to avoid excise taxes under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code or be paid in full (with the NEO paying any such excise taxes), whichever option places the NEO in the best after-tax position.
SEVERANCE BENEFIT | AMOUNT | |
Base salary, plus greater of (i) target-level | ||
Cash payment in lieu of COBRA premiums for: | ||
• Eighteen months for Mr. Patadia | ||
ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE AWARD | Prorated annual incentive award, payable based on actual performance at time award would have been paid if NEO had not terminated employment, with the individual performance portion to be | |
(no stock options remain outstanding as of March 2024) | ||
Continue vesting in accordance with their terms with respect to the performance requirements |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 65 |
Executive Compensation Tables
Executive Change in Control Severance Plan
All of our current officers are participants in the CIC Plan. Under the CIC Plan, if a change in control of Healthpeak occurs during the term of the CIC Plan and a participant’s employment with Healthpeak is terminated by Healthpeak without cause or by the participant for good reason within the two-year period following the change in control, the participant will generally be entitled to receive the following benefits:
SEVERANCE BENEFIT | AMOUNT | |
| ||
Cash payment in lieu of COBRA premiums for: | ||
• Eighteen months for Mr. Patadia | ||
ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE AWARD | Prorated annual incentive award based on the greater of target-level or average of three prior | |
| ||
Full vesting; options remain exercisable for two years (no stock options remain outstanding as of March 2024) | ||
Continue vesting in accordance with their terms with respect to the performance requirements, unless otherwise noted in the award agreement as described below under “Change-in-Control Benefits (Assuming No Employment Termination)” |
For these purposes, the terms “cause,” “good reason” and “change in control” are each defined in the CIC Plan, as such definitions may be amended from time to time.
A participant’s right to receive benefits under the CIC Plan is subject to the execution of a release of claims in favor of Healthpeak upon the termination of the participant’s employment. Participants are also subject to an indefinite confidentiality covenant and 12-month post-termination non-solicitation and non-competition restrictive covenants under the CIC Plan for the duration of the severance payout period, as applicable.applicable and enforceable. Participants in the CIC Plan are not entitled to tax gross-ups under the CIC Plan or any other agreement with the Company.
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Executive Compensation Tables
Estimated Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits
Severance Benefits (No Change in Control)
The following table presents our estimate of the amount of the benefits to which the NEOs would have been entitled had their employment terminated under the indicated circumstances pursuant to the terms of the Severance Plan on December 31, 2022.2023. The chart assumes that the executive would not be entitled to receive the benefits provided under the CIC Plan in connection with such a termination of employment.
TERMINATION BY HEALTHPEAK WITHOUT CAUSE | TERMINATION DUE TO EXECUTIVE’S DEATH OR DISABILITY | |||||||||||||||
NAME | CASH SEVERANCE ($)(1) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH/ LIFE BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | CASH SEVERANCE ($) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | ||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 9,085,485 | 115,519 | 7,581,745 | 16,782,749 | — | — | 7,581,745 | 7,581,745 | ||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 5,743,900 | 49,371 | 3,795,924 | 9,589,195 | — | — | 3,795,924 | 3,795,924 | ||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 5,199,510 | 35,352 | 2,961,619 | 8,196,481 | — | — | 2,961,619 | 2,961,619 | ||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 2,639,481 | 77,013 | 1,414,976 | 4,131,470 | — | — | 1,414,976 | 1,414,976 | ||||||||
Adam G. Mabry | 2,533,888 | 54,511 | 1,545,164 | 4,133,563 | — | — | 1,545,164 | 1,545,164 |
TERMINATION BY HEALTHPEAK WITHOUT CAUSE | TERMINATION DUE TO EXECUTIVE’S DEATH OR DISABILITY | |||||||||||||||
NAME | CASH SEVERANCE ($)(1) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH/ LIFE BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | CASH SEVERANCE ($) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | ||||||||
Scott M. Brinker | 8,156,866 | 123,979 | 8,280,182 | 16,561,027 | — | — | 8,280,182 | 8,280,182 | ||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 5,209,270 | 52,928 | 3,461,698 | 8,723,897 | — | — | 3,461,698 | 3,461,698 | ||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 4,718,343 | 37,983 | 2,673,282 | 7,429,609 | — | — | 2,673,282 | 2,673,282 | ||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 2,770,000 | 82,653 | 1,804,493 | 4,657,146 | — | — | 1,804,493 | 1,804,493 | ||||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 1,980,750 | 43,932 | 1,129,343 | 3,154,024 | — | — | 1,129,343 | 1,129,343 |
(1) | As described above under “—Severance Plans—Executive Severance Plan” and as quantified in this column, the Severance Plan provides for a cash severance payment in the event of a qualifying termination of employment based on a multiple of base salary and annual |
Patadia, $668,250. | |
(2) | These amounts represent the amounts that would be paid to the individual for the estimated aggregate cost of the premiums that would be charged to each individual to continue health coverage pursuant to COBRA for such individual and his eligible dependents (to the extent that such dependents were receiving health benefits prior to the individual’s termination date) for the period of coverage set forth above. |
(3) | These columns report the intrinsic value of the unvested portions of the executive’s equity awards that would accelerate in the circumstances described above. For |
On October 6, 2022, Mr. HerzogUnder our retirement policy, equity awards granted in 2023 will vest upon an NEO’s qualifying retirement. A qualifying retirement occurs if an NEO voluntary retires from service on or after the date on which the NEO’s age plus total years of service equals at least 70, the NEO has attained at least 55 years of age, and the Company mutually agreedNEO has completed at least five years of service with the Company. Retentive LTIP awards vest in full upon a qualifying retirement if the performance hurdle has been satisfied, while performance-based awards vest based on actual performance, prorated for the NEO’s service during the performance period. Mr. Klaritch is the only NEO who would have satisfied retirement eligibility in 2023. Assuming his qualifying retirement on December 31, 2023, the value of the unvested portions of his 2023 equity awards that he would step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer and directorhave accelerated in connection with an involuntary terminationsuch a qualifying retirement (calculated using a price per share of his employment without “cause” under our Severance Plan. We did not pay Mr. Herzog any additional amounts beyond what we were obligated to pay pursuant to$19.80, which is the termsclosing price of our Severance Plan. Mr. Herzog executed a separation and release agreement that providedcommon stock on the last trading day of 2023) is $1,529,753. Equity awards granted in 2021–2022 do not include provisions for the following severance benefits contractually due under the Severance Plan, subject to Mr. Herzog’s compliance with restrictive covenants set forthaccelerated vesting in the release agreement: (1) cash severanceevent of $13.8 million to be paid over three years; (2) prorated 2022 STIP award of $2,186,878; and (3) cash payment of $53,028 in lieu of continuation of healthcare benefits for three years. In accordance with the terms of the Severance Plan, Mr. Herzog also received continued vesting of his outstanding time-based restricted stock units in accordance with their terms for 24 months following separation, after which any remaining unvested portion of such restricted stock units will fully vest, and continued vesting of Mr. Herzog’s outstanding performance-based restricted stock units in accordance with their terms with respect to the applicable performance requirements.
Table of Contentsan NEO’s retirement.
Executive Compensation Tables
Release Agreement with Mr. McHenry
On November 1, 2022, Mr. McHenry and the Company mutually agreed that he would step down from his position as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel. As a result of this separation, Mr. McHenry was not eligible to receive severance benefits under our Severance Plan. In connection with Mr. McHenry’s separation, we agreed to pay Mr. McHenry an amount in cash equal to $2 million in exchange for his execution of a release agreement, subject to his compliance with restrictive covenants set forth in the release agreement. Mr. McHenry agreed to forfeit his unpaid 2022 STIP award and all of his unvested LTIP awards that were outstanding on his separation date.
Change-in-Control Benefits (Assuming No Employment Termination)
As described above under “Description of Plan-Based Awards—20222023 3-Year LTIP PSUs,Awards,” if we undergo a change in control during the performance period applicable to outstanding PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards granted to the NEOs, the performance period for such PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards will be shortened and performance will be determined based on the shortened period. The number of PSUsunits deemed to have vested based on the shortened period will accelerate and vest in connection with the change in control. In this scenario, the PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards would vest without regard to whether the NEO terminates employment in connection with the change in control. Upon a change in control of Healthpeak, RSUsRetentive LTIP Awards held by NEOs would continue to be subject to service-based vesting in accordance with the terms of the awards and would only accelerate upon a termination of an NEO’s employment as described under “Change-in-Control Severance Benefits in Connection with Employment Termination” below.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 67 |
Assuming that a change in control of Healthpeak occurred on December 31, 2022,2023, the values of the unvested portions of the PSUsTSR-Based LTIP Awards held by each NEO that would have accelerated in connection with such change in control (calculated using a price per share of $25.07,$19.80, which is the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of 2022)2023) are as follows: (1) $3,594,637$4,871,176 for Mr. Brinker; (2) $2,311,454$2,298,785 for Mr. Scott; (3) $2,035,483$1,766,977 for Mr. Klaritch; and (4) $198,780$766,339 for Mr. Bohn.Bohn; and (5) $256,559 for Mr. Mabry did not hold unvested PSUs as of December 31, 2022.Patadia.
The following table presents our estimate of the benefits to which each of the NEOs would have been entitled had a change in control of the Company occurred on December 31, 2022,2023, and the executive’s employment with us had terminated under the circumstances described above on such date (before any excise-tax reduction under our CIC Plan described above or under the executive’s applicable equity award agreement).
NAME | CASH SEVERANCE ($)(1) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH/LIFE BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | ||||
Scott M. Brinker | 9,085,485 | 115,519 | 3,987,108 | 13,188,112 | ||||
Peter A. Scott | 6,818,900 | 61,713 | 1,484,470 | 8,365,083 | ||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 6,174,510 | 44,190 | 926,136 | 7,144,836 | ||||
Scott R. Bohn | 3,139,481 | 96,266 | 1,216,196 | 4,451,943 | ||||
Adam G. Mabry | 3,033,888 | 68,139 | 1,545,164 | 4,647,192 |
NAME | CASH SEVERANCE ($)(1) | CONTINUATION OF HEALTH/LIFE BENEFITS ($)(2) | EQUITY ACCELERATION ($)(3) | TOTAL ($) | ||||
Scott M. Brinker | 8,156,866 | 123,979 | 3,409,006 | 11,689,851 | ||||
Peter A. Scott | 6,140,338 | 66,160 | 1,162,913 | 7,369,411 | ||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 5,563,804 | 47,479 | 906,305 | 6,517,589 | ||||
Scott R. Bohn | 3,282,500 | 103,316 | 1,038,154 | 4,423,970 | ||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 2,418,250 | 58,576 | 872,784 | 3,349,610 |
(1) | As described above under “—Severance Plans—Executive Change in Control Severance Plan” and as quantified in this column, the CIC Plan provides for a cash severance payment in the event of a qualifying termination of employment. Additionally, the CIC Plan provides for the payment of a pro-rated annual cash incentive amount for the year of termination, which, assuming a termination on December 31, |
(2) | These amounts represent the amounts that would be paid to the individual for the estimated aggregate cost of the premiums that would be charged to each individual to continue health coverage pursuant to COBRA for such individual and his eligible dependents (to the extent that such dependents were receiving health benefits prior to the individual’s termination date) for the period of coverage set forth above. |
(3) | See footnote (3) to the preceding table under “—Severance Benefits” for the manner of calculating equity acceleration value. All outstanding |
Pay Ratio
The following pay ratio and supporting information compares the annual total compensation of our President and CEO and the annual total compensation of our employees other than our President and CEO, as required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act. The pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
For 2022,2023, our last completed fiscal year:
The annual total compensation of our median employee was | |
The annual total compensation of our President and CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was |
Based on the foregoing, the estimated ratio of the annual total compensation of our President and CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee was approximately 28:1. To determine the pay ratio, we took the steps outlined below.
Based on the foregoing, the estimated ratio of the annual total compensation of our President and CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee was approximately 32:1. To determine the pay ratio, we took the steps outlined below. | |
• | We determined that as of December 31, |
2023. | |
To identify the median employee, we computed each employee’s annual compensation consisting of annual base salary as well as all cash bonuses and the grant date value of equity awards granted during the year, as applicable. For these purposes, we annualized the base salary and cash bonuses of employees who did not work for us for the entire year, other than temporary employees. We did not make any cost of living adjustments. |
68 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Once we identified our median employee, we calculated that employee’s annual total compensation for |
This pay ratio is an estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions and make reasonable estimates and assumptions. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to our pay ratio, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Pay-Versus-Performance Table
The following summarizes the relationship between our CEO’s, and our other Named Executive Officers’, total compensation paid and our financial performance for the fiscal years shown in the table (in this discussion, our CEO is also referred to as our principal executive officer or “PEO”, and our Named Executive Officers other than our CEO are referred to as our “Non-PEO NEOs”).
AVERAGE SUMMARY COMP. | AVERAGE | VALUE OF INITIAL FIXED $100 INVESTMENT BASED ON: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR | SUMMARY COMP. TABLE TOTAL FOR CEO (MR. HERZOG)(1)(2) | COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO CEO (MR. HERZOG)(3) | SUMMARY COMP. TABLE TOTAL FOR CEO (MR. BRINKER)(1)(2) | COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO CEO (MR. BRINKER)(3) | TABLE TOTAL PAID TO NON-PEO NEOs(1)(2) | COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO NON-PEO NEOs(3) | HEALTHPEAK TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN(4) | PEER TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN(4) | NET INCOME (IN MILLIONS)(5) | NORMALIZED FFO PER SHARE(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 24,308,605 | $ | 19,911,300 | $ | 5,557,084 | $ | 2,901,565 | $ | 3,267,762 | $ | 1,959,250 | $ | 82.79 | $ | 100.62 | $ | 516.4 | $ | 1.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | $ | 11,713,883 | $ | 17,397,357 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,767,688 | $ | 5,579,450 | $ | 114.23 | $ | 134.06 | $ | 525.9 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | 11,374,615 | $ | 10,106,805 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,389,595 | $ | 2,905,009 | $ | 92.31 | $ | 94.88 | $ | 428.3 | $ | 1.60 |
AVERAGE SUMMARY | VALUE OF INITIAL FIXED $100 INVESTMENT BASED ON: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR | SUMMARY COMP. TABLE TOTAL FOR CEO (MR. BRINKER)(1)(2) | COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO CEO (MR. BRINKER)(3) | SUMMARY COMP. TABLE TOTAL FOR FORMER CEO (MR. HERZOG)(1)(2) | COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO FORMER CEO (MR. HERZOG)(3) | COMP. TABLE TOTAL PAID TO NON-PEO NEOs(1)(2) | AVERAGE COMP. ACTUALLY PAID TO NON-PEO NEOs(3) | HEALTH- PEAK TOTAL STOCK- HOLDER RETURN(4) | PEER TOTAL STOCK- HOLDER RETURN(4) | NET INCOME (IN MILLIONS)(5) | NORMALIZED FFO PER SHARE(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | $ | 7,692,510 | $ | 2,500,263 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,003,451 | $ | 1,549,751 | $ | 65.39 | $ | 112.04 | $ | 334.8 | $ | 1.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 5,557,084 | $ | 2,901,565 | $ | 24,308,605 | $ | 19,680,747 | $ | 3,267,762 | $ | 1,959,250 | $ | 82.79 | $ | 100.62 | $ | 516.4 | $ | 1.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 11,713,883 | $ | 17,200,186 | $ | 3,767,688 | $ | 5,579,450 | $ | 114.23 | $ | 134.06 | $ | 525.9 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 11,374,615 | $ | 9,884,943 | $ | 3,389,595 | $ | 2,905,009 | $ | 92.31 | $ | 94.88 | $ | 428.3 | $ | 1.60 |
(1) | In accordance with applicable SEC rules, since Mr. |
For 2023, our Non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Scott, Klaritch, Bohn and Patadia. | |
Executive Compensation Tables
(2) | See the Summary Compensation Table above, and the Summary Compensation Table as disclosed in our proxy statement filed with the SEC in calendar year 2023, for detail on the Summary Compensation Table total compensation for each CEO for each fiscal year covered in the table. The average compensation for the Non-PEO NEOs for |
(3) | For purposes of this table, the compensation actually paid (also referred to as “CAP”) to each of our NEOs (including, for purposes of this table, former executive officers who are included in the Non-PEO NEO group for 2020, 2021, 2022 and |
| |
| Less the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” columns of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year based on the grant date fair value of such awards; |
| Plus the fiscal year-end value of Healthpeak stock awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested at the end of the covered fiscal year; |
| Plus/(less) the change in value as of the end of the covered fiscal year as compared to the value at the end of the prior fiscal year for Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years and were outstanding and unvested at the end of the covered fiscal year; |
| Plus the vesting date value of Healthpeak stock awards that were granted and vested during the same covered fiscal year; |
| Plus/(less) the change in value as of the vesting date as compared to the value at the end of the prior fiscal year for Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years and vested in the covered fiscal year; |
| Less, as to any Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years that were forfeited during the covered fiscal year, the value of such awards as of the end of the prior fiscal year; and |
| Plus the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid during the covered fiscal year on outstanding and unvested Healthpeak stock awards to the extent not reflected in the grant date fair values of the awards. |
No stock options were granted, and no unvested stock options were outstanding, during the applicable fiscal years. There were no material modifications to any stock awards during the applicable fiscal years.
No stock options were granted, and no unvested stock options were outstanding, during the applicable fiscal years. There were no material modifications to any stock awards during the applicable fiscal years.
In making each of these adjustments, the “value” of a or stock award is the fair value of the award on the applicable date determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation assumptions we then used to calculate the fair value of our equity awards. For more information on the valuation of our equity awards, please see the notes to our financial statements that appear in our Annual Report on Form 10-K each fiscal year and the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table that appears in our annual Proxy Statement.
The table above reflects the CAP (determined as noted above) for each CEO and, for our Non-PEO NEOs, the average of the CAPs determined for the Non-PEO NEOs for each of the fiscal years shown in the table.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid for Mr. Herzog.
Reconciliation of Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid for CEO (Mr. Herzog) | Fiscal Year 2022 ($) | Fiscal Year 2021 ($) | Fiscal Year 2020 ($) | ||||
Summary Compensation Table Total | 24,308,605 | 11,713,883 | 11,374,615 | ||||
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (7,374,832 | ) | (7,102,283 | ) | (8,028,215 | ) | |
Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | 5,979,535 | 8,283,835 | 6,554,530 | ||||
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (3,306,057 | ) | 3,328,563 | (1,534,844 | ) | ||
Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | 685,203 | 751,962 | 1,068,838 | ||||
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (611,707 | ) | 224,226 | 450,019 | |||
Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | — | — | — | ||||
Dividends Paid on Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards | 230,553 | 197,171 | 221,862 | ||||
Compensation Actually Paid | 19,911,300 | 17,397,357 | 10,106,805 |
Executive Compensation Tables
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid for Mr. Brinker.
2022 ($) | 2021 ($) | 2020 ($) | |||||
our annual Proxy Statement. |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the average of the Summary Compensation Table Total for the Non-PEO NEOs for a fiscal year to the average of the Compensation Actually Paid for the Non-PEO NEOs for that fiscal year.
Reconciliation of Average Summary Compensation Table Total to Average Compensation Actually Paid for Non-PEO NEOs | Fiscal Year 2022 ($) | Fiscal Year 2021 ($) | Fiscal Year 2020 ($) | ||||
Summary Compensation Table Total | 3,267,762 | 3,767,688 | 3,389,595 | ||||
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (1,535,477 | ) | (1,718,594 | ) | (1,849,445 | ) | |
Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | 1,087,331 | 2,004,500 | 1,509,955 | ||||
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (368,699 | ) | 1,104,314 | (640,251 | ) | ||
Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | 103,198 | 249,639 | 354,058 | ||||
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (132,238 | ) | 59,047 | (17,412 | ) | ||
Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | (516,184 | ) | — | — | |||
Dividends Paid on Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards | 53,557 | 112,856 | 158,509 | ||||
Compensation Actually Paid | 1,959,250 | 5,579,450 | 2,905,009 |
(4) | Healthpeak TSR represents cumulative total stockholder return on a fixed investment of $100 in our common stock for the period beginning on the last trading day of 2019 through the end of the applicable fiscal year, and is calculated assuming the reinvestment of dividends before consideration of income taxes. Peer total stockholder return represents cumulative total stockholder return on a fixed investment of $100 in the Equity REIT Index of Nareit for the period beginning on the last trading day of 2019 through the end of the applicable fiscal year, and is calculated assuming the reinvestment of dividends before consideration of income taxes. |
Executive Compensation Tables
The following chart illustrates the CAP for each CEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the last three fiscal years against our TSR and the TSR for the Equity REIT Index of Nareit (each calculated as described above) over that period of time.
Executive Compensation Tables
(5) | This column shows Healthpeak’s net income for each fiscal year covered by the table. The following chart illustrates the CAP for each CEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the last |
(6) | This column shows Healthpeak’s Normalized FFO per share for each fiscal year covered by the table. We consider Normalized FFO per share to be a key metric in our executive compensation |
(1) | In accordance with applicable SEC rules, since Mr. Brinker and Mr. Herzog each served as PEO during covered fiscal years, they are each included in the table above and the footnotes that follow the table as a PEO for the fiscal years in which they served in such capacity. For each of 2020 and 2021, our Non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Brinker, Scott, Klaritch and McHenry. For 2022, our Non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Scott, Klaritch, Bohn, Mabry and McHenry. For 2023, our Non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Scott, Klaritch, Bohn and Patadia. |
(2) | See the Summary Compensation Table above, and the Summary Compensation Table as disclosed in our proxy statement filed with the SEC in calendar year 2023, for detail on the Summary Compensation Table total compensation for each CEO for each fiscal year covered in the table. The average compensation for the Non-PEO NEOs for 2023 was calculated from the Summary Compensation Table above. The average compensation for the Non-PEO NEOs for each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 was calculated from the Summary Compensation Table as disclosed in our Proxy Statement filed with the SEC in calendar year 2023, 2022 or 2021, respectively. |
(3) | For purposes of this table, the compensation actually paid (also referred to as “CAP”) to each of our NEOs (including, for purposes of this table, former executive officers who are included in the Non-PEO NEO group for 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023) means each NEO’s total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year and adjusted for the following: • Less the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” columns of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year based on the grant date fair value of such awards; • Plus the fiscal year-end value of Healthpeak stock awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested at the end of the covered fiscal year; • Plus/(less) the change in value as of the end of the covered fiscal year as compared to the value at the end of the prior fiscal year for Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years and were outstanding and unvested at the end of the covered fiscal year; • Plus the vesting date value of Healthpeak stock awards that were granted and vested during the same covered fiscal year; • Plus/(less) the change in value as of the vesting date as compared to the value at the end of the prior fiscal year for Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years and vested in the covered fiscal year; • Less, as to any Healthpeak stock awards that were granted in prior fiscal years that were forfeited during the covered fiscal year, the value of such awards as of the end of the prior fiscal year; and • Plus the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid during the covered fiscal year on outstanding and unvested Healthpeak stock awards to the extent not reflected in the grant date fair values of the awards. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 69 |
No stock options were granted, and no unvested stock options were outstanding, during the applicable fiscal years. There were no material modifications to any stock awards during the applicable fiscal years.
In making each of these adjustments, the “value” of a stock award is the fair value of the award on the applicable date determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation assumptions we then used to calculate the fair value of our equity awards. For more information on the valuation of our equity awards, see the notes to our financial statements that appear in our Annual Report on Form 10-K each fiscal year and the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table that appears in our annual Proxy Statement.
The table above reflects the CAP (determined as noted above) for each CEO and, for our Non-PEO NEOs, the average of the CAPs determined for the Non-PEO NEOs for each of the fiscal years shown in the table.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid for Mr. Brinker.
RECONCILIATION OF SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE TOTAL TO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID FOR CEO (MR. BRINKER) | FISCAL YEAR 2023 ($ | ) | FISCAL YEAR 2022 ($ | ) | FISCAL YEAR 2021 ($) | FISCAL YEAR 2020 ($) | ||||||||||
Summary Compensation Table Total | 7,692,510 | 5,557,084 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (5,204,310 | ) | (3,134,399 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | 2,997,838 | 2,541,379 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (2,282,005 | ) | (2,232,034 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | — | 402,297 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (960,951 | ) | (445,419 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Dividends Paid on Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards | 257,182 | 212,657 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Compensation Actually Paid | 2,500,263 | 2,901,565 | — | — |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the average of the Summary Compensation Table Total for the Non-PEO NEOs for a fiscal year to the average of the Compensation Actually Paid for the Non-PEO NEOs for that fiscal year.
RECONCILIATION OF AVERAGE SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE TOTAL TO AVERAGE COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID FOR NON-PEO NEOS | FISCAL YEAR 2023 ($ | ) | FISCAL YEAR 2022 ($ | ) | FISCAL YEAR 2021 ($) | FISCAL YEAR 2020 ($) | ||||||||||
Summary Compensation Table Total | 3,003,451 | 3,267,762 | 3,767,688 | 3,389,595 | ||||||||||||
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (1,387,525 | ) | (1,535,477 | ) | (1,718,594 | ) | (1,849,445 | ) | ||||||||
Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | 822,314 | 1,087,331 | 2,004,500 | 1,509,955 | ||||||||||||
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (671,242 | ) | (368,699 | ) | 1,104,314 | (640,251 | ) | |||||||||
Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | — | 103,198 | 249,639 | 354,058 | ||||||||||||
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (292,301 | ) | (132,238 | ) | 59,047 | (17,412 | ) | |||||||||
Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | — | (516,184 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Dividends Paid on Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards | 75,053 | 53,557 | 112,856 | 158,509 | ||||||||||||
Compensation Actually Paid | 1,549,751 | 1,959,250 | 5,579,450 | 2,905,009 |
(4) | Healthpeak TSR represents cumulative total stockholder return on a fixed investment of $100 in our common stock for the period beginning on the last trading day of 2019 through the end of the applicable fiscal year, and is calculated assuming the reinvestment of dividends before consideration of income taxes. Peer total stockholder return represents cumulative total stockholder return on a fixed investment of $100 in the Equity REIT Index of Nareit for the period beginning on the last trading day of 2019 through the end of the applicable fiscal year, and is calculated assuming the reinvestment of dividends before consideration of income taxes. |
70 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
The following chart illustrates our TSR for each of the last three fiscal years against our TSR and the TSR for the Equity REIT Index of Nareit (each calculated as described above) over that period of time.
The following chart illustrates the CAP for each CEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the last four fiscal years against our TSR and the TSR for the Equity REIT Index of Nareit (each calculated as described above) over that period of time.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 71 |
(5) | This column shows Healthpeak’s net income for each fiscal year covered by the table. The following chart illustrates the CAP for each CEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the last four fiscal years against our net income for each of those years. |
(6) | This column shows Healthpeak’s Normalized FFO per share for each fiscal year covered by the table. We consider Normalized FFO per share to be a key metric in our executive compensation program; see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement for more information regarding the use of this performance measure. The following chart illustrates the CAP for each CEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the last four fiscal years against our Normalized FFO per share for each of those years. |
Following is an unranked list of our financial performance measures we consider most important in linking the compensation actually paid to our NEOs for 20222023 with our performance.
• | Normalized FFO per share (used in our | |
• | Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre (used in our | |
• | Relative TSR (used in our |
In addition to the financial performance measures listed above, we view our stock price, upon which the value of all of our LTIP awards is dependent, as a key performance-based component of our executive compensation program in order to further align the interests of our senior management team with the interests of our stockholders.
Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
General
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to approve the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”), which was adopted, subject to stockholder approval, by the Board on February 2, 2023. We believe that incentive-driven and performance-based compensation focuses employees on our objective of creating long-term stockholder value, and that compensation plans like the 2023 Plan are an important attraction, retention and motivation tool for its participants.
Accordingly, performance-based incentive compensation constitutes one of the key objectives of our compensation practice. STIP and LTIP compensation are each determined based on objective Company performance metrics and individualized objectives, the latter of which include both specified quantitative Company performance metrics and qualitative individual performance goals, as described above. Our LTIP is divided between a time-vested retentive component and a forward-looking, 3-year performance-based component that directly measures Healthpeak’s performance against relative total stockholder return (TSR).
We currently maintain the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan, or the 2014 Plan. As of March 1, 2023, a total of 2,804,712 shares of our common stock were then subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2014 Plan and an additional 26,481,407 shares of our common stock were then available for new award grants under the 2014 Plan. Our authority to grant new awards under the 2014 Plan will expire on January 30, 2024. In light of the pending expiration of the 2014 Plan, which is the only plan under which we may currently grant awards, our Board approved the 2023 Plan so that we can continue to grant equity-based awards as part of our executive and non-executive compensation programs.
If stockholders approve the 2023 Plan, no new awards will be granted under the 2014 Plan.
|
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
Historical Annual Share Usage and Potential Dilution
While the use of equity is an important part of our compensation, we are mindful of our responsibility to our stockholders in exercising judgment in the granting of equity awards. The following information is intended to help stockholders assess the potential dilutive impact of our equity awards and the proposed 2023 Plan.
Our overhang (the sum of shares subject to outstanding options and full-value awards plus shares available for grant, as a percentage of the sum of common shares outstanding plus shares subject to outstanding options and full-value awards plus shares available for grant) was 0.4% as of December 31, 2022, which includes 306,356 outstanding stock options granted under our historical 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), which has expired. If the 2023 Plan is approved by our stockholders, the maximum overhang would be 0.5% (based on 230,328 outstanding options and 2,804,712 outstanding full-value awards (including vested restricted stock units and dividend equivalents that are not yet payable) as of March 1, 2023).
AS OF | AS OF MARCH 1, | |||
A. Shares subject to outstanding restricted stock unit and LTIP Unit awards, excluding performance-based vesting awards (under 2014 Plan) | 947,813 | 1,060,889 | ||
B. Shares subject to outstanding performance-based vesting restricted stock unit and LTIP Unit awards (under 2014 Plan) | 781,323 | 1,743,823 | ||
C. Shares subject to outstanding options (under 2006 Plan) | 306,356 | 230,328 | ||
D. Total Number of Shares Subject to Outstanding Awards (A+B+C) | 2,035,492 | 3,035,040 | ||
E. Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding | 537,991,924 | 546,841,930 | ||
F. Annual Share Usage (D / E) | 0.4% | 0.6% | ||
G. Shares Available for New Awards (under 2014 Plan) | 24,665,251 | 26,481,407 | ||
H. Burn Rate | 0.2% | 0.2% |
For this purpose, “burn rate” in the table above is calculated by dividing (1) the total number of shares of our common stock subject to all awards granted under the 2014 Plan for the applicable period of time (all of 2022 as to the December 31, 2022 presentation, and January 1, 2023 to March 1, 2023 as to the March 1, 2023 presentation), taking performance-based vesting awards into account at the target level of performance (or maximum level, for LTIP Unit awards) and counting all shares subject to awards on a 1:1 basis before taking into account the 2014 Plan’s share counting rules for full-value awards, by (2) the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of the applicable date.
We estimate that, upon approval of the 2023 Plan, the maximum level of equity dilution caused by our equity compensation program will be less than 10% on a basic dilution basis. We expect that, if approved by our stockholders, the shares of our common stock available for issuance for awards under the 2023 Plan, including the 5 million new shares, will be sufficient for currently-anticipated awards for the next 10 years. However, expectations regarding future share usage could be impacted by a number of factors, including, for example, hiring and promotion activity, the rate at which shares are returned to the share reserve upon expiration, termination, forfeiture, or cash-settlement of awards, the future performance of our stock price, the stock price at which awards are granted, changes in competitors’ compensation practices, merger and acquisition activity and other factors.
Summary Description of the 2023 Plan
The principal terms of the 2023 Plan are summarized below. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2023 Plan, which is included as Appendix B.
Purpose
The purpose of the 2023 Plan is to promote the success of Healthpeak and the interests of our stockholders by providing an additional means for us to attract, motivate, retain and reward directors, officers, employees and other eligible persons. Equity-based awards are also intended to further align the interests of award recipients and our stockholders.
Administration
Our Board or one or more committees appointed by our Board will administer the 2023 Plan. Our Board has delegated general administrative authority for the 2023 Plan to the Compensation Committee. A committee may delegate some or all of its authority with respect to the 2023 Plan to another committee of directors, and certain limited authority to grant awards to employees may be delegated to one or more officers of Healthpeak. (The appropriate acting body, be it the Board, a committee within its delegated authority, or an officer within his or her delegated authority, is referred to in this proposal as the “Administrator”).
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
The Administrator has broad authority under the 2023 Plan with respect to award grants including, without limitation, the authority:
No Repricing or Loans
In no case (except due to an adjustment to reflect a stock split or similar event or any repricing that may be approved by stockholders) will any adjustment be made to a stock option or stock appreciation right award under the 2023 Plan (by amendment, cancellation and re-grant, exchange or other means) that would constitute a repricing of the per share exercise or base price of the award. Furthermore, loans to employees (to finance the purchase or exercise of awards or otherwise) are not permitted under the 2023 Plan.
Eligibility
Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2023 Plan include officers or employees of Healthpeak or any of its subsidiaries, directors of Healthpeak and certain consultants and advisors to Healthpeak or any of its subsidiaries. As of March 1, 2023, approximately 198 officers and employees of Healthpeak and its subsidiaries (including all of Healthpeak’s named executive officers) are considered eligible under the 2023 Plan, in addition to each of our current seven Independent Directors. As of March 1, 2023, we did not have any consultants or advisors that are currently eligible under the 2023 Plan.
Authorized Shares; Limits on Awards
The maximum number of shares of Healthpeak common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2023 Plan is the sum of the following:
| |
As of March 1, 2023, 26,481,407 shares were available for additional award grant purposes under the 2014 Plan, no shares were subject to stock options then outstanding under the 2014 Plan, approximately 1,060,889 shares were subject to time-based restricted stock unit and LTIP Unit awards then outstanding under the 2014 Plan, and 1,743,823 shares were reserved with respect to performance-based restricted stock units and LTIP Units then outstanding under the 2014 Plan. As noted above, no additional awards will be granted under the 2014 Plan if stockholders approve the 2023 Plan.
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
Shares issued in respect of any “full-value award” granted under the 2023 Plan will be counted against the share limit as 1.5 shares for every one share actually issued in connection with the award. For example, if we grant an award of 100 RSUs under the 2023 Plan, 150 shares would be counted against the share limit with respect to that award. A “full-value award” generally means any award granted under the 2023 Plan other than a stock option or stock appreciation right.
The following other limits are also contained in the 2023 Plan:
To the extent that an award is settled in cash or a form other than shares, the shares that would have been delivered had there been no such cash or other settlement will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2023 Plan. In the event that shares are delivered in respect of a dividend equivalent right, only the actual number of shares delivered with respect to the award shall be counted against the share limits of the 2023 Plan. To the extent that shares are delivered pursuant to the exercise of a stock appreciation right or stock option, the number of underlying shares as to which the related exercise shall be counted against the applicable share limits, as opposed to only counting the shares actually issued. (For purposes of clarity, if a stock appreciation right relates to 100,000 shares and is exercised at a time when the payment due to the participant is 15,000 shares, 100,000 shares shall be charged against the applicable share limits with respect to such exercise.) Shares that are subject to or underlie awards that expire or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, are forfeited, fail to vest or for any other reason are not paid or delivered under the 2023 Plan will again be available for subsequent awards under the 2023 Plan. In addition, the 2023 Plan generally provides that shares issued in connection with awards that are granted by or become obligations of Healthpeak through the assumption of awards (or in substitution for awards) in connection with an acquisition of another company will not count against the shares available for issuance under the 2023 Plan. Healthpeak may not increase the applicable share limits of the 2023 Plan by repurchasing shares of common stock on the market (by using cash received through the exercise of stock options or otherwise). If stockholders approve the 2023 Plan, shares that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by Healthpeak to pay the exercise price of an award granted under the 2023 Plan, as well as any shares exchanged or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award, will not be available for subsequent awards under the 2023 Plan.
Types of Awards
The 2023 Plan authorizes stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock bonuses and other forms of awards granted or denominated in Healthpeak common stock or units of Healthpeak common stock, as well as cash bonuses. The 2023 Plan retains flexibility to offer competitive incentives and to tailor benefits to specific needs and circumstances. Any award may be paid or settled in cash.
A stock option is the right to purchase shares of Healthpeak common stock at a future date at a specified price per share (the “exercise price”). The per share exercise price of an option generally may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Healthpeak common stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of an option is ten years from the date of grant. An option may be either an incentive stock option or a nonqualified stock option. Incentive stock option benefits are taxed differently from nonqualified stock options, as described under “Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards Under the 2023 Plan” below. Incentive stock options are also subject to more restrictive terms and are limited in amount by the Code and the 2023 Plan. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of Healthpeak or a subsidiary.
A stock appreciation right is the right to receive payment of an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of Healthpeak common stock on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right over the base price of the stock appreciation right. The base price will be established by the Administrator at the time of grant of the stock appreciation right and generally cannot be less than the fair market value of a share of Healthpeak common stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with other awards or independently. The maximum term of a stock appreciation right is ten years from the date of grant.
The other types of awards that may be granted under the 2023 Plan include, without limitation, stock bonuses, restricted stock, performance stock, stock units, deferred shares, and similar rights to purchase or acquire shares. The types of cash awards that may be granted under the 2023 Plan include the opportunity to receive a payment for the achievement of one or more goals established by the Administrator as well as discretionary cash awards. Dividend equivalent rights may also be granted under the 2023 Plan, either as a separate award or in connection with another award under the plan; provided, however, that dividend equivalent rights may not be granted as to a stock option or stock appreciation right granted under the plan. In addition, any dividends and/or dividend equivalents as to the portion of an award under the 2023 Plan
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
that is subject to unsatisfied vesting requirements will be subject to termination and forfeiture to the same extent as the corresponding portion of the award to which they relate in the event the applicable vesting requirements are not satisfied.
Any awards under the 2023 Plan may be fully vested at grant or may be subject to time- and/or performance-based vesting requirements.
In addition, the 2023 Plan authorizes the issuance of LTIP Units. An “LTIP Unit” is an “LTIP Unit” of Healthpeak OP, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”) that is intended to constitute a “profits interest” within the meaning of the Code. The Operating Partnership is the operating partner in our Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust, or UPREIT, structure. The Administrator is authorized to grant LTIP Units under the 2023 Plan in such amount and subject to such terms and conditions as it may determine. In applying the share limit and share counting rules under the 2023 Plan, each LTIP Unit subject to an award under the 2023 Plan is treated as one share of Healthpeak common stock (or, with respect to full-value awards of LTIP Units, as 1.5 shares of Healthpeak common stock when applying the premium counting rule, discussed above, applicable to full-value awards).
Deferrals
The Administrator may provide for the deferred payment of awards and may determine the other terms applicable to deferrals. The Administrator may provide that deferred settlements include the payment or crediting of interest or other earnings on the deferred amounts, or the payment or crediting of dividend equivalents where the deferred amounts are denominated in shares.
Acceleration of Awards; Possible Early Termination of Awards
Generally, and subject to limited exceptions set forth in the 2023 Plan, if any person acquires 25% or more of the outstanding common stock or combined voting power of Healthpeak, if certain changes in a majority of our Board occur over a period of no longer than two years, if stockholders prior to a transaction do not continue to own more than 66 2/3% of the voting securities of Healthpeak (or a successor or a parent) following a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or similar corporate transaction involving Healthpeak or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of Healthpeak’s assets or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by Healthpeak or any of its subsidiaries, or if Healthpeak is dissolved or liquidated, then awards then-outstanding under the 2023 Plan may become fully vested or paid, as applicable, and may terminate or be terminated in such circumstances, subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. The Administrator also has the discretion to establish other change in control provisions with respect to awards granted under the 2023 Plan. For example, the Administrator could provide for the acceleration of vesting or payment of an award in connection with a change in control event that is not described above and provide that any such acceleration shall be automatic upon the occurrence of any such event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a change in control event constitutes a payment event with respect to any award that provides for the deferral of compensation that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, to the extent required to avoid the imposition of additional taxes under Section 409A of the Code, the transaction or event described above with respect to such award will only constitute a change in control event for purposes of the payment timing of such award if such transaction also constitutes a “change in control event,” as defined in Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5). The Administrator shall have full and final authority to determine conclusively whether a change in control event of the Company has occurred pursuant to the above definition, the date of the occurrence of such change in control event and any incidental matters relating thereto.
Transfer Restrictions
Subject to certain exceptions contained in Section 5.7 of the 2023 Plan, awards under the 2023 Plan generally are not transferable by the recipient other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and are generally exercisable, during the recipient’s lifetime, only by the recipient. Any amounts payable or shares issuable pursuant to an award generally will be paid only to the recipient or the recipient’s beneficiary or representative. The Administrator has discretion, however, to establish written conditions and procedures for the transfer of awards to other persons or entities, provided that such transfers comply with applicable federal and state securities laws and, with limited exceptions set forth in the 2023 Plan, are not made for value.
Adjustments
As is customary in incentive plans of this nature, each share limit and the number and kind of shares available under the 2023 Plan and any outstanding awards, as well as the exercise or purchase prices of awards and performance hurdles under certain types of performance-based awards, are subject to adjustment in the event of certain reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock splits, stock dividends, or other similar events that change the number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary dividends or distributions of property to the stockholders.
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
No Limit on Other Authority
Except as expressly provided with respect to the termination of the authority to grant new awards under the 2014 Plan if stockholders approve the 2023 Plan, the 2023 Plan does not limit the authority of the Board or any committee to grant awards or authorize any other compensation, with or without reference to Healthpeak common stock, under any other plan or authority.
Termination of or Changes to the 2023 Plan
The Board may amend or terminate the 2023 Plan at any time and in any manner. Stockholder approval for an amendment will be required only to the extent then required by applicable law or any applicable listing agency or required under Sections 422 or 424 of the Code to preserve the intended tax consequences of the plan. For example, stockholder approval will be required for any amendment that proposes to increase the maximum number of shares that may be delivered with respect to awards granted under the 2023 Plan. (Adjustments as a result of stock splits or similar events will not, however, be considered an amendment requiring stockholder approval.) Unless terminated earlier by the Board, the authority to grant new awards under the 2023 Plan will terminate on February 2, 2033. Outstanding awards, as well as the Administrator’s authority with respect thereto, generally will continue following the expiration or termination of the plan. Generally speaking, outstanding awards may be amended by the Administrator (except for a repricing), but the consent of the award holder is required if the amendment (or any plan amendment) materially and adversely affects the holder.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards under the 2023 Plan
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of awards under the 2023 Plan under current federal law, which is subject to change, are summarized in the following discussion of the general tax principles applicable to the 2023 Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other considerations, does not describe the deferred compensation provisions of Section 409A of the Code to the extent an award is subject to and does not satisfy those rules, nor does it describe state, local, or international tax consequences.
With respect to nonqualified stock options, the Company is generally entitled to deduct and the participant recognizes taxable income in an amount equal to the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise. With respect to incentive stock options, the Company is generally not entitled to a deduction nor does the participant recognize income at the time of exercise, although the participant may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax.
The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2023 Plan generally follow certain basic patterns: nontransferable restricted stock subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture results in income recognition equal to the excess of the fair market value over the price paid (if any) only at the time the restrictions lapse (unless the recipient elects to accelerate recognition as of the date of grant); bonuses, stock appreciation rights, cash and stock-based performance awards, dividend equivalents, stock units, and other types of awards are generally subject to tax at the time of payment; and compensation otherwise effectively deferred is taxed when paid. In each of the foregoing cases, the Company will generally have a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes income. LTIP Units are generally not subject to income tax so long as they constitute a “profits interest” within the meaning of the Code, including, to the extent applicable, Revenue Procedure 93–27, 1993–2 C.B. 343 and Revenue Procedure 2001–41, 2001–2 C.B. 191, and the Company generally will not have a tax deduction with respect to any such LTIP Unit awards.
If an award is accelerated under the 2023 Plan in connection with a “change in control” (as this term is used under the Code), the Company may not be permitted to deduct the portion of the compensation attributable to the acceleration (“parachute payments”) if it exceeds certain threshold limits under the Code (and certain related excise taxes may be triggered). Furthermore, Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the deductibility of compensation paid to our current and former executive officers that exceeds $1 million during the tax year.
New Plan Benefits
All future grants under the 2023 Plan are within the discretion of the Administrator, and the benefits of such grants are, therefore, not determinable. Healthpeak has not approved any awards that are conditioned upon stockholder approval of the 2023 Plan. Healthpeak is not currently considering any other specific award grants under the 2023 Plan, other than the annual grants of RSUs to our Independent Directors described in the following paragraph. If the 2023 Plan had been in existence in 2022, we expect that our award grants for 2022 would not have been different from those actually made in 2022 under the 2014 Plan. For information regarding the awards granted in 2022 to our NEOs, see the material under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” in this proxy statement.
Proposal 04: Approval of the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan
As described in the “Director Compensation” section above, our current compensation program for Independent Directors includes an annual award of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $180,000, rounded up to the nearest whole share, for each Independent Director who is elected at the annual meeting of stockholders or is initially appointed as an Independent Director other than at the annual meeting. If stockholders approve the 2023 Plan, these awards will be granted under the 2023 Plan and no new awards will be granted under the 2014 Plan. Assuming, for illustrative purposes only, that the value of a share of Healthpeak common stock used for the conversion of the $180,000 grant date value into RSUs is $23.64, the number of shares that would be allocated to our seven Independent Directors as a group pursuant to the annual grant formula is approximately 7,615 shares per year or approximately 76,150 shares over the ten years in the scheduled term of the 2024 Plan (2023 through 2032) based on that assumed stock price. The actual number of shares used, however, will vary with the number of Independent Directors in office each year, the number of new Independent Directors who join the board other than on an annual meeting date, fluctuations in our stock price, and whether changes are made to the type, size or frequency of awards for our Independent Directors.
The closing market price for a share of Healthpeak’s common stock on March 1, 2023 was $23.64.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, for each of the Company’s equity compensation plans, the number of shares of common stock subject to outstanding awards, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options and the number of shares remaining available for future award grants as of December 31, 2022.2023.
PLAN CATEGORY | NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS | WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS ($) | NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (EXCLUDING SECURITIES REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) | |||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,015,731(1) | 35.54(2) | 24,665,251(3) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Total | 2,015,731 | 35.54 | 24,665,251 |
PLAN CATEGORY | NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS | WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS ($) | NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (EXCLUDING SECURITIES REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,071,586 | (1) | 33.79 | (2) | 30,771,272 | (3) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Total | 3,071,586 | 33.79 | 30,771,272 |
(1) | Of these shares, |
(2) | This weighted average exercise price does not reflect |
(3) | Of the aggregate number of shares that remained available for issuance as of December 31, |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 73 |
Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors and Management
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 1, 20235, 2024 (unless otherwise indicated) regarding the beneficial ownership, as that term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, of shares of our common stock by: (i) each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; (ii) each director and nominee for election as director; (iii) each of the NEOs; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. This table is based on Company records and information supplied to us by our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders or included in a Schedule 13G, or an amendment thereto, filed with the SEC. TheSEC with respect to shares of our common stock. With respect to the principal stockholders, the following table does not reflect beneficial ownership of any additional shares that such stockholders may have acquired upon the closing of our merger with Physicians Realty Trust on March 1, 2024. The following table also does not include certain LTIP Units, which, regardless of their vesting schedules, are subject to a 14-month holding period following their grant date or cancellation and replacement date, as applicable.
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) | ||||||
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER | NUMBER OF SHARES | NUMBER OF OPTIONS/ RSUs(2) | PERCENT OF CLASS(3) | |||
Greater than 5% Stockholders | ||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. and affiliates(4) 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 1 9355 | 87,991,432 | — | 16.37% | |||
BlackRock, Inc.(5) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 59,435,809 | — | 11.10% | |||
State Street Corporation(6) State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 | 39,270,414 | — | 7.31% | |||
Directors | ||||||
Scott M. Brinker(7) | 154,250 | — | * | |||
Brian G. Cartwright | 40,063 | 5,258 | * | |||
Christine N. Garvey | 22,627(8) | 5,258 | * | |||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. | 46,768 | 5,258 | * | |||
David B. Henry | 71,459 | 5,258 | * | |||
Sara G. Lewis | 16,061 | �� | 5,258 | * | ||
Katherine M. Sandstrom | 21,954 | 5,258 | * | |||
Named Executive Officers | ||||||
Peter A. Scott | 164,339 | — | * | |||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 342,483 | 31,759 | * | |||
Scott R. Bohn | 16,860 | 1,814 | * | |||
Adam G. Mabry | 3,729 | — | * | |||
Thomas M. Herzog(9) | 472,035(8) | — | * | |||
Troy E. McHenry(10) | 109,693 | 7,727 | * | |||
All current directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) | 991,017 | 65,121 | * |
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER | NUMBER OF SHARES | NUMBER OF OPTIONS/ RSUS/ PROFITS INTEREST UNITS(3) | PERCENT OF CLASS(4) | |||||||||
Greater than 5% Stockholders | ||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. and affiliates(5) 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 1 9355 | 87,756,738 | — | 16.04 | % | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(6) 50 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 | 57,105,438 | — | 10.40 | % | ||||||||
State Street Corporation(7) State Street Financial Center 1 Congress Street, Suite 1 Boston, MA 02114 | 41,217,077 | — | 7.53 | % | ||||||||
Directors | ||||||||||||
Scott M. Brinker(8) | 183,588 | — | * | |||||||||
Katherine M. Sandstrom | 27,212 | 8,193 | * | |||||||||
John T. Thomas(9) | 827,229 | — | * | |||||||||
Brian G. Cartwright | 45,321 | 8,193 | * | |||||||||
James B. Connor | 10 | (10) | 8,193 | * | ||||||||
Christine N. Garvey | 27,885 | (11) | 8,193 | * | ||||||||
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. | 52,026 | 8,193 | * | |||||||||
David B. Henry | 76,717 | 8,193 | * | |||||||||
Pamela J. Kessler(12) | 32,822 | — | * | |||||||||
Sara G. Lewis | 43,319 | (13) | 8,193 | * | ||||||||
Ava E. Lias-Booker | 10,329 | — | * | |||||||||
Governor Tommy G. Thompson(14) | 112,581 | — | * | |||||||||
Richard A. Weiss | 49,493 | — | * | |||||||||
Named Executive Officers | ||||||||||||
Peter A. Scott | 164,339 | — | * | |||||||||
Thomas M. Klaritch | 336,900 | — | * | |||||||||
Scott R. Bohn | 18,625 | — | * | |||||||||
Ankit B. Patadia | 6,115 | — | * | |||||||||
All current directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons) | 2,096,846 | 57,351 | * |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | Except as otherwise noted and subject to applicable community property laws, each individual has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed. |
(2) | Does not include profits interest units to acquire equity interests in Healthpeak OP, LLC beneficially owned by such person that are not exchangeable into Healthpeak common stock within 60 days of March 5, 2024. |
(3) | For the Independent Directors, consists of shares represented by unvested RSU awards that will vest within 60 days of March |
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors and Management
Unless otherwise indicated, based on | |
Share and beneficial ownership information for The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) is given as of December | |
Share and beneficial ownership information for BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is given as of December 31, | |
Share and beneficial ownership information for State Street Corporation (“State Street”) is given as of December 31, | |
Mr. Brinker is also an NEO. | |
(9) | Includes 4,274 shares held by accounts for the benefit of Mr. Thomas’s children, and 67,400 shares subject to a legacy margin loan that existed prior to the Physicians Realty Trust merger and will be paid off in full following the closing of the merger. |
Consists of shares held in spouse’s trust. | |
(11) | Consists of shares held in a family trust. |
(12) | Includes 20,875 shares held in a family trust, 200 shares held in an individual retirement account and 2,547 shares held by spouse’s individual retirement account. |
Our Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for |
Our Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audits the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP, or Deloitte, to continue to serve as Healthpeak’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.2024. Deloitte has served as Healthpeak’s independent registered public accounting firm since March 3, 2010. A representative of Deloitte is expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement and be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Audit Committee annually reviews Deloitte’s performance and independence in deciding whether to engage a different independent registered public accounting firm. In the course of these reviews, the Audit Committee considers, among other things:
| Deloitte’s independence from the Company and management, including any factors that may impact Deloitte’s objectivity
| |
Deloitte’s qualifications and capability in handling all aspects of the Company’s operations
| ||
The desired balance of Deloitte’s experience and fresh perspective occasioned by mandatory audit partner rotation
| ||
The experience, qualifications and performance of our existing audit engagement team | ||
| ||
The quality and candor of Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee and management
| ||
Deloitte’s quality control procedures
| ||
The quality and effectiveness of Deloitte’s historical and recent audit plans and performance on our audit
| ||
The advisability and potential impact of appointing a different independent public accounting firm |
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Voting Standard and Board Recommendation We are asking our stockholders to vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company. Following its review, the Audit Committee believes that Deloitte’s continued engagement as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company for the following reasons:Table ofBack to Contents Proposal 05: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm2023.2024. Ratification requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Although ratification is not required by our organizational documents or otherwise, our Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance.
EXPERIENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS | ||||
Enhanced audit quality. Through years of experience, Deloitte has gained significant institutional knowledge of our business and operations, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting. | ||||
Effective audit plans and efficient fee structures. Deloitte’s knowledge of our business and control framework enables it to design effective audit plans that cover key risk areas while capturing cost efficiencies in audit scope and internal control testing. | ||||
Maintaining continuity avoids disruption. Bringing on a new auditor, without reasonable cause, would require extensive education and a significant period of time for the new auditor to reach a comparable level of knowledge and familiarity with our business and control framework. | STRONG INDEPENDENCE CONTROLS Thorough Audit Committee oversight. The Audit Committee believes that any concerns with Deloitte’s tenure are mitigated by the Audit Committee’s oversight, which includes ongoing engagement with Deloitte and a comprehensive annual review process. Robust pre-approval policies and limits on non-audit services. The Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services performed by Deloitte, including the types of services to be provided and the estimated fees relating to those services. Deloitte’s strong internal independence procedures and regulatory framework. Deloitte conducts periodic internal quality reviews of its audit work and rotates lead partners every five years. Deloitte is also subject to PCAOB inspections, peer reviews, and PCAOB and SEC oversight. | |||
The following table shows information about the respective fees billed by Deloitte during or related to the fiscal years ended December 31, 20222023 and 20212022 (in thousands):
2022 | 2021 | |||
Audit Fees(1) | $2,704 | $2,881 | ||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 445 | 206 | ||
Tax Fees: | ||||
Tax Compliance(3) | 694 | 684 | ||
Tax Planning and Tax Advice(4) | 735 | 649 | ||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||
Total | $4,578 | $4,420 |
2023 | 2022 | ||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 3,540 | $ 2,704 | ||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 239 | 445 | |||
Tax Fees: | |||||
Tax Compliance(3) | 787 | 694 | |||
Tax Planning and Tax Advice(4) | 1,047 | 735 | |||
All Other Fees | — | — | |||
Total | $ | 5,613 | $ 4,578 |
(1) | Audit fees include fees and out-of-pocket expenses billed for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the review of interim consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, |
(2) | Audit-related fees primarily relate to, among other things, fees for the separate audits of certain of our consolidated subsidiaries and certain accounting consultations. |
(3) | Tax compliance fees primarily involve the preparation or review of tax returns. |
(4) | Tax planning and tax advice fees encompass a diverse range of services, including tax advice related to acquisitions and investments, consultation regarding the impact of proposed actions/activities on REIT qualification, and consultation regarding the foreign, federal, state, and local tax matters related to various transactions. Tax planning and tax advice fees for 2023 include fees related to the merger with Physicians Realty Trust. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 77 |
Proposal 05: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Pursuant to its charter and good corporate governance practices, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by Deloitte and all related fees. The Audit Committee has delegated its preapproval authority to its Chair, provided that the Chair presents any pre-approvals related to audit and permitted non-audit services to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee considered whether the provision of proposed non-audit services by Deloitte to the Company was compatible with maintaining the audit firm’s independence and concluded that Deloitte’s independence was not compromised by the provision of such services and pre-approved all services provided by Deloitte in 20222023 and 2021.2022.
The Audit Committee currently consists of threefour members: Messrs. Griffin (Chair), Connor and Henry and Ms. Garvey. The Board has determined that all Audit Committee members are independent under applicable NYSE and SEC rules and that Messrs. Griffin, Connor and Henry and Ms. Garvey are financial experts. The Audit Committee has certain duties and powers as described in its written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of the charter can be found on the Company’s website at healthpeak.com/esg/governance.
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal financial controls, preparing the financial statements and the public reporting process. Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022,2023, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022,2023, Deloitte’s evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, significant accounting policies and practices, and management judgments and estimates. The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte any relationships that may impact its objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to Deloitte’s independence.
Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited consolidated financial statements and the review and discussions described in the foregoing paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022,2023, be included in the Annual Report, as filed with the SEC.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
R. Kent Griffin, Jr. (Chair) Independent Director |
| Christine N. Garvey Independent Director | David B. Henry | ||
The foregoing report of the Audit Committee is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Voting at the Annual Meeting
General Information
Stockholders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on March 1, 2023,5, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on the record date, there were 546,992,640709,577,429 shares of our common stock outstanding and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. There is no other class of voting securities outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote at the Annual Meeting. To have a quorum at the Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present or represented by proxy.
AGENDA ITEM | DESCRIPTION | PAGE NUMBER | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR APPROVAL | EFFECT OF ABSTENTIONS | EFFECT OF BROKER NON-VOTES | DESCRIPTION | PAGE NUMBER | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR APPROVAL | EFFECT OF ABSTENTIONS | EFFECT OF BROKER NON-VOTES | ||||||||||||
01 | Proposal to elect the eight director nominees | 13 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | Proposal to elect the eleven director nominees | 12 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | ||||||||||||
02 | Proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers | 40 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | Proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers | 41 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | ||||||||||||
03 | Proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation | 41 | 1 YEAR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 | 76 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | None expected | ||||||||||||
04 | Proposal to approve the Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 2023 Performance Incentive Plan | 76 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | ||||||||||||||||||
05 | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 | 86 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | No effect | None expected |
Abstentions will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast for purposes of determining the outcome of any proposal. Broker non-votes on Proposal No. 1 (election of directors), and Proposal No. 2 (approval of 20222023 executive compensation on an advisory basis), Proposal No. 3 (approval of the frequency of future votes on executive compensation on an advisory basis), and Proposal No. 4 (approval of 2023 Performance Incentive Plan) will be counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but will not be counted as votes cast for purposes of determining the outcome of any of these proposals.
You may submit your proxy or voting instructions via the Internet, by telephone or by mail, depending on the manner in which you receive your proxy materials. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability by mail, you can submit a proxy or voting instructions via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability. If you received a printed set of the proxy materials by mail, you may submit a proxy or voting instructions via the Internet, by telephone (if available) or by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction form.
Additional Information about the Annual Meeting
If you are a stockholder of record voting by telephone or the Internet, your proxy must be received by 9:59 p.m. Mountain Time (11:59 p.m. Eastern Time) on April 26, 2023,24, 2024, in order for your shares to be voted at the Annual Meeting. However, if you are a stockholder of record submitting a proxy card by mail, you may instead mark, sign and date the proxy card you received and return it in the accompanying prepaid and addressed envelope so that it is received by us before the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, please provide your voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee who holds your shares by the deadline specified by such bank, broker or nominee.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 79 |
All stockholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by written ballot. However, if you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name through a bank, broker or other nominee, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, broker or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you submit your proxy or voting instructions in advance to authorize the voting of your shares at the Annual Meeting so that your vote will be counted if you are later unable to attend. If you later attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, your previously submitted proxy or voting instructions will not be used.
Your shares will be voted as you specify in your proxy or voting instructions. Although our Board does not know of any business to be considered at the Annual Meeting other than the fivethree proposals described in this proxy statement, if any other business properly comes before the Annual Meeting, a stockholder’s properly submitted proxy gives authority to the proxy holder to vote on those matters in his or her discretion. If you are a stockholder of record and properly submit a proxy but do not specify your voting choice on one or more of the items listed in the notice of meeting, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board on those items.
If you hold your shares in street name through a brokerage account and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker will not be authorized to vote your shares on any of the matters at the Annual Meeting, other than Proposal No. 53 (the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023)2024). If your broker exercises its discretion to vote on Proposal No. 53 at the Annual Meeting, your shares will constitute “broker non-votes” on each of the other items at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, by submitting a later-dated proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail by the applicable deadline provided under “Voting Via the Internet, Telephone or Mail,” or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in street name through a bank, broker or other nominee, you may revoke any previous voting instructions by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, broker or nominee by the deadline specified by your bank, broker or nominee or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not by itself constitute a revocation of any proxy or voting instructions.
Additional Annual Meeting Information
Delivery of Proxy Materials
We may satisfy SEC rules regarding delivery of proxy materials, including our proxy statements and Annual Reports, by delivering only one set of proxy materials to multiple stockholders that share the same address, unless we have received contrary instructions in writing. This “householding” process can result in meaningful cost savings for us and is consistent with our commitment to sustainability by reducing the environmental impact of printing and mailing paper copies. Upon oral or written request, we will deliver promptly a separate copy of proxy materials to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy materials was delivered. If your shares are registered in your own name, you may request a separate copy of the proxy materials for this Annual Meeting or for future meetings of Healthpeak stockholders by notifying Broadridge toll-free at 1–866–540–7095 or writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. If you are a street name holder, please contact the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares to request a separate copy of proxy materials.
In the future, stockholders of record can avoid receiving duplicate mailings by following the instructions on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. If you hold your shares in street name and you would like to receive only one copy of the proxy materials in the future, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee.
80 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Our Annual Report containing our audited consolidated financial statements accompanies this proxy statement. Upon the written request of any person solicited hereby, we will provide a copy of our Annual Report to such person, without charge. Requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at Healthpeak Properties, Inc., 4600 South Syracuse Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80237.
Votes cast by proxy or at the Annual Meeting will be counted by a representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the appointed inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting. In connection with the duties as inspector of elections, Broadridge’s representative will also determine whether a quorum is present, evaluate the validity of proxies and ballots, and certify the voting results.
We will bear all costs of the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors and officers of Healthpeak, without receiving any additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, email or other electronic means. We will request brokerage houses, banks and other custodians or nominees holding stock in their names for others to forward proxy materials to their customers or principals who are the beneficial owners of shares of our common stock and will reimburse them for their expenses in doing so. We have retained the services of Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $10,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We may engage Georgeson for additional solicitation work and incur fees greater than $10,000, depending on a variety of factors, including preliminary voting results.
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and disclose final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 81 |
20242025 Stockholder Proposals, Director Nominations and Director Candidate Recommendations
We expect to hold our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders on or about April 25, 2024.
Proposals to be Included in
20242025 Proxy Materials
Any stockholder that desires to have a proposal considered for presentation at the 20242025 annual meeting of stockholders, and included in Healthpeak’s proxy materials used in connection with our 20242025 annual meeting, must submit the proposal in writing to our Corporate Secretary so that it is received no later than November 18, 2023.13, 2024. The proposal must also comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act to be so included. If the date of next year’s annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from the date of this year’s Annual Meeting, then the deadline will be a reasonable time before we begin to make our proxy materials available to stockholders.
Any stockholder (or group of no more than 25 stockholders) meeting the Company’s continuous ownership requirements set forth in our Bylaws that wishes to nominate candidates for election to our Board for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 20242025 annual meeting of stockholders must provide written notice to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than October 19, 2023,14, 2024, nor later than November 18, 2023.13, 2024. Other specifics regarding the foregoing proxy access right, including the required content of the notice and certain other eligibility and procedural requirements, can be found in Section 8 of Article II of our Bylaws.
If a stockholder seeks to nominate a candidate for election or to propose business for consideration at our 20242025 annual meeting but not have it included in our proxy materials for the 20242025 annual meeting, we must receive notice of the proposal or director nomination no earlier than January 28, 2024,25, 2025, and no later than February 27, 2024.24, 2025. If we change the date of our 20242025 annual meeting to a date that is before March 28, 2024,26, 2025, or after June 26, 2024,24, 2025, however, notice of any proposal or director nomination must instead be delivered not earlier than the 90th 90th day and not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th 60th day prior to our 20242025 annual meeting, or the 10th 10th day following the day on which we publicly announce the date of our 20242025 annual meeting. If the notice is not received between these dates or does not satisfy the additional notice requirements set forth in Article II, Section 7(a) of our Bylaws, the notice will be considered untimely and any nomination or business proposed to be brought before the meeting will be disregarded and not be acted upon at our 20242025 annual meeting. Proposals, nominations and notices should be directed to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, Healthpeak Properties, Inc., 4600 South Syracuse Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80237.
In addition,accordance with our Bylaws, the foregoing deadline and notice requirements set forth in Article II, Section 7(a) of our Bylaws are also intended to apply to and satisfy the notice requirements set forth in Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, including paragraph (b) thereunder, with respect to notice by a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees at the 20242025 annual meeting must deliver written notice to the Company setting forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, unless the required information has been provided in a preliminary or definitive proxy statement previously filed by the stockholder. Such written notice must be provided in accordance with Rule 14a-19 no later than February 27, 2024. If we change the date of our 2024 annual meeting to a date that is before March 28, 2024, or after May 27, 2024, the written notice must be received by the later of the 60th day prior to our 2024 annual meeting, or the 10th day following the day on which we publicly announce the date of our 2024 annual meeting. The notice requirement under Rule 14a-19 is in addition to the applicable notice requirements under our Bylaws as described above.
82 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Stockholders may also recommend director candidates for our Board’s consideration. The Governance Committee will consider director candidates properly recommended by stockholders in the same manner as recommendations received from other sources. Stockholder recommendations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Governance Committee, c/o Healthpeak Properties, Inc., 4600 South Syracuse Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80237, together with the proposed candidate’s name, address, age, appropriate biographical information, descriptions of the candidate’s qualifications and the relationship, if any, to the recommending stockholder, together with any other information about the
Other Matters
stockholder and the candidate that would otherwise be required pursuant to our Bylaws if the stockholder was nominating the candidate for election to our Board at an annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders who would like to recommend a candidate for consideration by our Board in connection with the next annual meeting of stockholders should submit their written recommendation no later than January 1 of the year of the annual meeting.
Vote
VoteWe urge you to submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible, whether or not you expect to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. If you attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, your proxy will not be used. |
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Scott A. Graziano
Senior
Carol B. Samaan
Vice President, – DeputyAssociate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Denver, Colorado
March 17, 202313, 2024
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 83 |
Statements in this proxy statement that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding our and our officers’ intent, belief or expectation as identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “target,” “forecast,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “could,” “would,” “should” and other comparable and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among other things, (i) statements regarding timing, outcomes and other details relating to current, pending or contemplated acquisitions, dispositions, transitions, developments, redevelopments, densifications, joint venture transactions, capital recycling plans, financing activities, or other transactions; (ii) development densification and land bank opportunities; (iii) the outlook for Life Science,Lab, Outpatient Medical Office and CCRCs; (iv) our expectations regarding corporate responsibility and ESG goals and initiatives; and (v) potential capital sources and uses. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Pending acquisitions, dispositions, and leasing activity, including those that are subject to binding agreements, remain subject to closing conditions and may not close within the anticipated timeframes or at all. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations and views about future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect our future financial condition and results of operations. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith belief and assumptions we believe to be reasonable based upon current information, we can give no assurance that our expectations or forecasts will be attained. Further, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statement contained in this proxy statement, and such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: macroeconomic trends, including inflation, interest rates, labor costs, and unemployment; risks associated with the merger transactions with Physicians Realty Trust (the “Mergers”) that were completed on March 1, 2024, including, but not limited to, our ability to integrate the operations of the Company and Physicians Realty Trust successfully and realize the anticipated synergies and other benefits of the Mergers or do so within the anticipated time frame; changes within the industries in which we operate; significant regulation, funding requirements, and uncertainty faced by our existinglab tenants; factors adversely affecting our tenants’, operators’, or borrowers’ ability to meet their financial and future tenants, operators, and borrowers to conduct their respective businesses in a manner that generates sufficient income to make rent and loan paymentsother contractual obligations to us; the financial conditioninsolvency or bankruptcy of one or more of our major tenants, operators, and borrowers, including potential bankruptcies and downturns in their businesses, and their legal and regulatory proceedings;or borrowers; our concentration of real estate investments in the healthcare property sector, which makes us more vulnerable to a downturn in a specific sector than if we invested across multiple sectors; the illiquidity of real estate investments; our ability to identify and secure new or replacement tenants and operators; our property development, redevelopment, and tenant improvement activity risks, including project abandonments, project delays, and lower profits than expected; changes within the life science industry; significant regulation, funding requirements, and uncertainty faced by our life science tenants; the ability of the hospitals on whose campuses our outpatient medical office buildings (MOBs) are located and their affiliated healthcare systems to remain competitive or financially viable; our ability to develop, maintain, or expand hospital and health system client relationships; operational risks associated with third party management contracts, including the additional regulation and liabilities of our properties operated through RIDEA structures; economic conditions, natural disasters, weather, and other conditions that negatively affect geographic areas where we have concentrated investments; uninsured or underinsured losses, which could result in significant losses and/or performance declines by us or our tenants and operators; our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision making authority and our reliance on our partners’ financial condition and continued cooperation; our use of fixed rent escalators, contingent rent provisions, and/or rent escalators based on the Consumer Price Index; competition for suitable healthcare properties to grow our investment portfolio; our ability to foreclose or exercise rights on collateral securing our real estate-related loans; any requirement that we recognize reserves, allowances, credit losses, or impairment charges; investment of substantial resources and time in transactions that are not consummated; our ability to successfully integrate or operate acquisitions; the potential impact on us and our tenants, operators, and borrowers from litigation matters, including rising liability and insurance costs; environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with our real estate investments; our ability to satisfy ESG and sustainability commitments and requirements, as well as stakeholder expectations; epidemics, pandemics, or other infectious diseases, including Covid, and health and safety measures intended to reduce their spread; human capital risks, including the loss or limited availability of our key personnel; our reliance on information technology systems and the potential impactpossibility of system failures, disruptions,a cybersecurity incident or breaches;cybersecurity threat affecting our information systems or the information systems of our tenants, operators or borrowers; volatility, disruption, or uncertainty in the financial markets; increased borrowing costs, including due to rising interest rates; cash available for distribution to stockholders and our ability to make dividend distributions at expected levels; the availability of external capital on acceptable terms or at all, including due to rising interest rates, changes in our credit ratings and the value of our common stock, volatilitybank failures or uncertainty in the capital markets, and other factors;events affecting financial institutions; our ability to manage our indebtedness level and covenants in and changes to the terms of such indebtedness; the failure of our tenants, operators, and borrowers to comply with federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including resident health and safety requirements, as well as licensure, certification, and inspection requirements; required regulatory approvals to transfer our senior housing properties; compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety, and other regulations; laws or regulations prohibiting eviction of our tenants; the requirements of, or changes to, governmental reimbursement programs such as Medicare or Medicaid; legislation to address federal government operations and administrative decisions affecting the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; our participation in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES ActAct”) Provider Relief Fund and other Covid-related stimulus and relief programs; our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT; our taxable REIT subsidiaries being subject to corporate level tax; tax imposed on any net income from “prohibited transactions”; changes to U.S. federal income tax laws, and potential deferred and contingent tax liabilities from corporate acquisitions; calculating non-REIT tax earnings and profits distributions; ownership limits in our charter that restrict ownership in our stock; provisions of Maryland law and our charter that could prevent a transaction that may otherwise be in the interest of our stockholders; conflicts of interest between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of holders of Healthpeak OP common units; provisions in the operating agreement of Healthpeak OP and other agreements that may delay or prevent unsolicited acquisitions and other transactions; our status as a holding company of Healthpeak OP; and other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our SEC filings. Except as required by law, we do not undertake, and hereby disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.
84 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Appendix A
Reconciliations and Definitions
Reconciliations
NAREIT FFO, FFO AS ADJUSTED, AFFO AND NORMALIZED FFO PER SHARE
In thousands, except per share data
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | ||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares | $ | 497,792 | ||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization | 710,569 | |||
Healthpeak’s share of real estate related depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures | 27,691 | |||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of real estate related depreciation and amortization | (19,201 | ) | ||
Loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net(1) | (10,422 | ) | ||
Healthpeak’s share of loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net, from unconsolidated joint ventures | 134 | |||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of gain (loss) on sales of depreciable real estate, net | 12 | |||
Loss (gain) upon change of control, net(2) | (311,438 | ) | ||
Taxes associated with real estate dispositions | 29 | |||
Nareit FFO applicable to common shares | $ | 895,166 | ||
Distributions on dilutive convertible units and other | 9,407 | |||
Diluted Nareit FFO applicable to common shares | $ | 904,573 | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted Nareit FFO | 546,462 | |||
Impact of adjustments to Nareit FFO: | ||||
Transaction-related items | $ | 4,788 | ||
Other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), net(3) | 3,829 | |||
Restructuring and severance-related charges(4) | 32,749 | |||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries), net(5) | 4,401 | |||
Total adjustments | $ | 45,767 | ||
FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 940,933 | ||
Distributions on dilutive convertible units and other | 9,326 | |||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 950,259 | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted FFO as Adjusted | 546,462 | |||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.92 | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 1.33 | |||
Loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net(1) | (0.02 | ) | ||
Loss (gain) upon change of control, net(2) | (0.57 | ) | ||
Taxes associated with real estate dispositions | 0.00 |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2023 | 2022 | |||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares | $ | 304,284 | $ | 497,792 | ||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization | 749,901 | 710,569 | ||||||
Healthpeak’s share of real estate related depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures | 24,800 | 27,691 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of real estate related depreciation and amortization | (18,654 | ) | (19,201 | ) | ||||
Loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net | (86,463 | ) | (10,422 | ) | ||||
Healthpeak’s share of loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net, from unconsolidated joint ventures | — | 134 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of gain (loss) on sales of depreciable real estate, net | 11,546 | 12 | ||||||
Loss (gain) upon change of control, net(1) | (234 | ) | (311,438 | ) | ||||
Taxes associated with real estate dispositions | — | 29 | ||||||
Nareit FFO applicable to common shares | $ | 985,180 | $ | 895,166 | ||||
Distributions on dilutive convertible units and other | 9,394 | 9,407 | ||||||
Diluted Nareit FFO applicable to common shares | $ | 994,574 | $ | 904,573 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted Nareit FFO | 554,559 | 546,462 | ||||||
Impact of adjustments to Nareit FFO: | ||||||||
Transaction and merger-related items(2) | $ | 13,835 | $ | 4,788 | ||||
Other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), net(3) | (3,850 | ) | 3,829 | |||||
Restructuring and severance-related charges(4) | 1,368 | 32,749 | ||||||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries), net(5) | (4,033 | ) | 4,401 | |||||
Recognition (reversal) of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets(6) | (14,194 | ) | — | |||||
Total adjustments | $ | (6,874 | ) | $ | 45,767 | |||
FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 978,306 | $ | 940,933 | ||||
Distributions on dilutive convertible units and other | 9,402 | 9,326 | ||||||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 987,708 | $ | 950,259 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted FFO as Adjusted | 554,559 | 546,462 | ||||||
FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 978,306 | $ | 940,933 | ||||
Stock-based compensation amortization expense | 14,480 | 16,537 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 11,916 | 10,881 | ||||||
Straight-line rents(7) | (14,387 | ) | (49,183 | ) | ||||
AFFO capital expenditures | (113,596 | ) | (108,510 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes | (816 | ) | (4,096 | ) | ||||
Amortization of above (below) market lease intangibles, net | (25,791 | ) | (23,380 | ) | ||||
Other AFFO adjustments | (9,335 | ) | 520 | |||||
AFFO applicable to common shares | $ | 840,777 | $ | 783,702 | ||||
Distributions on dilutive convertible units and other | 6,581 | 6,594 | ||||||
Diluted AFFO applicable to common shares | $ | 847,358 | $ | 790,296 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted AFFO | 552,734 | 544,637 |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 85 |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2023 | 2022 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.92 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1.37 | 1.33 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on sales of depreciable real estate, net | (0.14 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Loss (gain) upon change of control, net(1) | 0.00 | (0.57 | ) | |||||
Taxes associated with real estate dispositions | — | 0.00 | ||||||
Diluted Nareit FFO per common share | $ | 1.79 | $ | 1.66 | ||||
Transaction and merger-related items(2) | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||||
Other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), net(3) | (0.01 | ) | 0.00 | |||||
Restructuring and severance-related charges(4) | 0.01 | 0.06 | ||||||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries), net(5) | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | |||||
Recognition (reversal) of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets(6) | (0.03 | ) | — | |||||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted per common share | $ | 1.78 | $ | 1.74 | ||||
Stock-based compensation amortization expense | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||
Straight-line rents(7) | (0.03 | ) | (0.09 | ) | ||||
AFFO capital expenditures | (0.20 | ) | (0.20 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 0.00 | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Amortization of above (below) market lease intangibles, net | (0.05 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Other AFFO adjustments | (0.02 | ) | 0.00 | |||||
Diluted AFFO per common share | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.45 | ||||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 987,708 | $ | 950,259 | ||||
Impact of adjustments to FFO as Adjusted: | ||||||||
Less: positive impact of CARES Act funding | (413 | ) | (7,860 | ) | ||||
Normalized FFO | $ | 987,295 | $ | 942,399 | ||||
Normalized FFO Per Share | $ | 1.78 | $ | 1.73 |
Appendix A
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | ||||
Diluted Nareit FFO per common share | $ | 1.66 | ||
Transaction-related items | 0.01 | |||
Other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), net(3) | 0.00 | |||
Restructuring and severance-related charges(4) | 0.06 | |||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries), net(5) | 0.01 | |||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted per common share | $ | 1.74 | ||
Diluted FFO as Adjusted applicable to common shares | $ | 950,259 | ||
Impact of adjustments to FFO as Adjusted: | ||||
Less: positive impact of CARES Act funding | (7,860 | ) | ||
Normalized FFO | $ | 942,399 | ||
Normalized FFO Per Share | $ | 1.725 |
(1) | |
(2) | The year ended December 31, 2023 includes costs related to the Mergers, which are primarily comprised of legal, accounting, tax, and other costs that were incurred prior to year-end, partially offset by termination fee income associated with Graphite Bio, Inc., for which the lease terms have been modified to accelerate expiration of the lease to December 2024. Termination fee income is included in rental and related revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
(3) | |
(4) | |
(5) | Casualty-related charges (recoveries), net are recognized in other income (expense), net and equity income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
(6) | In conjunction with classifying the assets related to the Callan Ridge JV as held for sale as of December 31, 2023, we concluded it was more likely than not that we would realize the future value of certain deferred tax assets generated by the net operating losses of taxable REIT subsidiaries. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized the reversal of a portion of the associated valuation allowance and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit. |
Appendix A
EBITDAre AND ADJUSTED EBITDAre
In thousands
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 10,802 | ||
Interest expense | 49,413 | |||
Income tax expense (benefit)(1) | (661 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 179,157 | |||
Other depreciation and amortization | 1,286 | |||
Loss (gain) on sales of real estate(1) | 986 | |||
Share of unconsolidated joint venture (“JV”): | ||||
Interest expense | 241 | |||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (19 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,642 | |||
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate from unconsolidated JVs | 45 | |||
EBITDAre | $ | 249,892 | ||
Transaction-related items(2) | 3,217 | |||
Other impairments (recoveries) and losses (gains)(2) | 9,760 | |||
Restructuring and severance-related charges | 32,749 | |||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries)(2) | 684 | |||
Stock-based compensation amortization expense | 1,903 | |||
Impact of transactions closed during the period(3) | 449 | |||
Adjusted EBITDAre | $ | 298,654 |
The year ended December 31, 2023 includes a $8.7 million write-off of straight-line rent receivable associated with Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., which commenced voluntary reorganization proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This |
86 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
EBITDAre AND ADJUSTED EBITDAre
In thousands
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 75,395 | ||
Interest expense | 52,784 | |||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (11,842 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 188,544 | |||
Other depreciation and amortization | 1,168 | |||
Share of unconsolidated joint venture (“JV”): | ||||
Interest expense | 834 | |||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 150 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,723 | |||
EBITDAre | $ | 313,756 | ||
Transaction and merger-related items(1) | 11,202 | |||
Other impairments (recoveries) and losses (gains)(1) | (5,445 | ) | ||
Casualty-related charges (recoveries)(1) | (3,462 | ) | ||
Stock-based compensation amortization expense | 3,513 | |||
Impact of transactions closed during the period(2) | 52 | |||
Adjusted EBITDAre | $ | 319,616 |
This amount includes the corresponding line on the FFO as Adjusted, AFFO per share and Normalized FFO per share reconciliation on page | |
Adjustment reflects the impact of transactions that closed during the period as if the transactions were completed at the beginning of the period. |
NET DEBT
DECEMBER 31, 2022 | ||||
Bank line of credit and commercial paper | $ | 995,606 | ||
Term loan | 495,957 | |||
Senior unsecured notes | 4,659,451 | |||
Mortgage debt | 346,599 | |||
Consolidated Debt | $ | 6,497,613 | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV mortgage debt | 39,790 | |||
Enterprise Debt | $ | 6,537,403 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | (72,032 | ) | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV cash and cash equivalents | (30,189 | ) | ||
Restricted cash | (54,802 | ) | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV restricted cash | (3,062 | ) | ||
Net Debt | $ | 6,377,318 |
DECEMBER 31, 2023 | ||||
Bank line of credit and commercial paper | $ | 720,000 | ||
Term loans | 496,824 | |||
Senior unsecured notes | 5,403,378 | |||
Mortgage debt | 256,097 | |||
Consolidated Debt | $ | 6,876,299 | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV mortgage debt | 39,906 | |||
Enterprise Debt | $ | 6,916,205 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | (117,635 | ) | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV cash and cash equivalents | (29,243 | ) | ||
Restricted cash | (51,388 | ) | ||
Share of unconsolidated JV restricted cash | (8,022 | ) | ||
Net Debt | $ | 6,709,917 |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 87 |
Appendix A
NET DEBT TO ADJUSTED EBITDAre (ANNUALIZED)
Dollars in thousands
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 FOR COMPENSATION METRICS(1) | |||||||
Net Debt | $ | 6,377,318 | $ | 6,377,318 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDAre (annualized)(2) | $ | 1,194,616 | $ | 1,194,429 | ||||
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre (annualized) | 5.34x | 5.34x |
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 | |||
Net Debt | $ | 6,709,917 | |
Adjusted EBITDAre (annualized)(1) | $ | 1,278,464 | |
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre (annualized) | 5.2x |
(1) | |
Represents Adjusted EBITDAre for the three months ended December 31, |
SAME-STORE PORTFOLIO CASH (ADJUSTED) NOI GROWTH
In thousands
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
LIFE SCIENCE | MEDICAL OFFICE | CCRC | LIFE SCIENCE | MEDICAL OFFICE | CCRC | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | $ | 244,521 | $ | 356,035 | $ | (40,405 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss (income) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | $ | 244,521 | $ | 356,035 | $ | (40,405 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 6,900 | 7,509 | 232 | 2,837 | 7,701 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 302,649 | 279,546 | 128,374 | 303,196 | 255,746 | 125,344 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transaction costs | 387 | 1,255 | 725 | 24 | 323 | 1,445 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments and loan loss (reserves) recoveries, net | — | — | — | — | 21,577 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sales of real estate, net | (3,744 | ) | (10,659 | ) | — | — | (190,590 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | (311,939 | ) | (12,709 | ) | 1,380 | (55 | ) | 2,725 | (2,141 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Government grant income | — | — | 6,765 | — | — | 1,412 | ||||||||||||||||||
Healthpeak’s share of unconsolidated joint venture NOI | 7,038 | 1,821 | 380 | 3,921 | 1,708 | 464 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of consolidated joint venture NOI | (181 | ) | (25,400 | ) | — | (205 | ) | (25,292 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Equity loss (income) from unconsolidated JVs | 972 | (852 | ) | (539 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (794 | ) | (1,484 | ) | |||||||||||||
Portfolio NOI | $ | 615,287 | $ | 448,482 | $ | 101,541 | $ | 550,516 | $ | 424,275 | $ | 92,336 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to NOI | (62,754 | ) | (15,513 | ) | 2,300 | (46,589 | ) | (11,118 | ) | 3,241 | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) NOI | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | $ | 503,927 | $ | 413,157 | $ | 95,577 | ||||||||||||
Portfolio Income | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | $ | 503,927 | $ | 413,157 | $ | 95,577 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to NOI | 62,754 | 15,513 | (2,300 | ) | 46,589 | 11,118 | (3,241 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-SS Portfolio NOI | (154,579 | ) | (79,484 | ) | 1,244 | (112,497 | ) | (68,835 | ) | 1,482 | ||||||||||||||
SS Portfolio NOI | $ | 460,708 | $ | 368,998 | $ | 102,785 | $ | 483,019 | $ | 355,440 | $ | 93,818 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash adjustment to SS Portfolio NOI | (36,837 | ) | (7,967 | ) | 2,300 | (34,667 | ) | (8,455 | ) | 3,475 | ||||||||||||||
SS Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) NOI | $ | 423,871 | $ | 361,031 | $ | 105,085 | $ | 403,352 | $ | 346,985 | $ | 97,293 |
Appendix A
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 | YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
LAB | OUTPATIENT MEDICAL | CCRC | LAB | OUTPATIENT MEDICAL | CCRC | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 385,059 | $ | 216,618 | $ | (26,587 | ) | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | ||||||||||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 385,059 | $ | 216,618 | $ | (26,587 | ) | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 7,770 | 7,010 | — | 6,900 | 7,509 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 328,349 | 289,683 | 131,869 | 302,649 | 279,546 | 128,374 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transaction and merger-related costs | 333 | 1,120 | 1,881 | 387 | 1,255 | 725 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sales of real estate, net | (60,498 | ) | (21,312 | ) | — | (3,744 | ) | (10,659 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net | (7 | ) | (2,697 | ) | (228 | ) | (311,939 | ) | (12,709 | ) | 1,380 | |||||||||||||
Government grant income | — | — | 184 | — | — | 6,765 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity (income) loss from unconsolidated JVs | (4,540 | ) | (835 | ) | — | 972 | (852 | ) | (539 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Healthpeak’s share of unconsolidated joint venture NOI | 5,832 | 1,844 | — | 7,038 | 1,821 | 380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of consolidated joint venture NOI | (463 | ) | (25,152 | ) | — | (181 | ) | (25,400 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio NOI | $ | 654,065 | $ | 467,039 | $ | 114,129 | $ | 615,287 | $ | 448,482 | $ | 101,541 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to NOI | (36,524 | ) | (14,314 | ) | (1,618 | ) | (62,754 | ) | (15,513 | ) | 2,300 | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) NOI | $ | 617,541 | $ | 452,725 | $ | 112,511 | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | ||||||||||||
Portfolio Income | $ | 617,541 | $ | 452,725 | $ | 112,511 | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to NOI | 36,524 | 14,314 | 1,618 | 62,754 | 15,513 | (2,300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Non-SS Portfolio NOI | (168,957 | ) | (39,987 | ) | 1,101 | (125,260 | ) | (32,899 | ) | (5,521 | ) | |||||||||||||
SS Portfolio NOI | $ | 485,108 | $ | 427,052 | $ | 115,230 | $ | 490,027 | $ | 415,583 | $ | 96,020 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash adjustment to SS Portfolio NOI | (23,979 | ) | (11,685 | ) | (1,618 | ) | (45,496 | ) | (13,763 | ) | 2,300 | |||||||||||||
SS Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) NOI | $ | 461,129 | $ | 415,367 | $ | 113,612 | $ | 444,531 | $ | 401,820 | $ | 98,320 |
YEAR-OVER-YEAR TOTAL SS PORTFOLIO CASH (ADJUSTED) NOI GROWTH
ACTUAL | PRO FORMA(1) | |||||||||||||||
FULL YEAR | % OF SS | FULL YEAR | % OF SS | |||||||||||||
Life science | 5.1 | % | 47.6 | % | 5.1 | % | 48.0 | % | ||||||||
Medical office | 4.0 | % | 40.6 | % | 4.0 | % | 40.9 | % | ||||||||
CCRC | 8.0 | % | 11.8 | % | 2.5 | % | 11.1 | % | ||||||||
Total Portfolio | 5.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 4.4 | % | 100.0 | % |
FULL YEAR 2023 | ||||||||
SS GROWTH | % | % OF SS | ||||||
Lab | 3.7 | % | 46.6 | % | ||||
Outpatient Medical | 3.4 | % | 42.0 | % | ||||
CCRC | 15.6 | % | 11.5 | % | ||||
Total Portfolio | 4.8 | % | 100.0 | % |
PORTFOLIO INCOME
Dollars in thousands
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIFE SCIENCE | MEDICAL OFFICE | CCRC | OTHER | CORPORATE NON-SEGMENT | TOTAL PORTFOLIO | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | $ | 12,524 | $ | (281,732 | ) | $ | 516,424 | ||||||||||
Loss (income) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | (2,884 | ) | (2,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 620,105 | $ | 208,580 | $ | (43,053 | ) | $ | 12,524 | $ | (284,616 | ) | $ | 513,540 | ||||||||||
Interest income | — | — | — | (23,300 | ) | — | (23,300 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 6,900 | 7,509 | — | 158,535 | 172,944 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 302,649 | 279,546 | 128,374 | — | — | 710,569 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | — | — | — | — | 131,033 | 131,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transaction costs | 387 | 1,255 | 725 | — | 2,486 | 4,853 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments and loan loss (reserves) recoveries, net | — | — | — | 7,004 | — | 7,004 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sales of real estate, net | (3,744 | ) | (10,659 | ) | — | 5,325 | — | (9,078 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | (311,939 | ) | (12,709 | ) | 1,380 | 13 | (3,013 | ) | (326,268 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | — | — | — | — | (4,425 | ) | (4,425 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Government grant income | — | — | 6,765 | — | — | 6,765 | ||||||||||||||||||
Healthpeak’s share of unconsolidated joint venture NOI | 7,038 | 1,821 | 380 | 16,751 | — | 25,990 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests’ share of consolidated joint venture NOI | (181 | ) | (25,400 | ) | — | — | — | (25,581 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity loss (income) from unconsolidated JVs | 972 | (852 | ) | (539 | ) | (1,566 | ) | — | (1,985 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio NOI | $ | 615,287 | $ | 448,482 | $ | 101,541 | $ | 16,751 | $ | — | $ | 1,182,061 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to NOI | (62,754 | ) | (15,513 | ) | 2,300 | 169 | — | (75,798 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Cash (Adjusted) NOI | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | $ | 16,920 | $ | — | $ | 1,106,263 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | — | — | — | 23,300 | — | 23,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Income | $ | 552,533 | $ | 432,969 | $ | 103,841 | $ | 40,220 | $ | — | $ | 1,129,593 | ||||||||||||
% of Total Portfolio | 48.9% | 38.3% | 9.2% | 3.6% | —% | 100.0% |
Appendix A
Definitions
Consolidated Debt. The carrying amount of bank line of credit, commercial paper, term loans, senior unsecured notes, and mortgage debt, as reported in our consolidated financial statements.
EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre. EBITDAre, or EBITDA for Real Estate, is a supplemental performance measure defined by Nareit and intended for real estate companies. It represents earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, gains or losses from sales of depreciable property (including gains or losses on change in control), and impairment charges (recoveries) related to depreciable property. Adjusted EBITDAre is defined as EBITDAre excluding other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), transaction-relatedtransaction and merger-related items, prepayment costs (benefits) associated with early retirement or payment of debt, restructuring and severance relatedseverance-related charges, litigation costs (recoveries), casualty-related charges (recoveries), stockstock-based compensation amortization expense, and foreign currency remeasurement losses (gains), adjusted to reflect the impact of transactions that closed during the period as if the transactions were completed at the beginning of the period. EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre include our pro rata share of our unconsolidated JVs presented on the same basis. We consider EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre important supplemental measures to net income (loss) because they provide an additional manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serve as additional indicators of our ability to service our debt obligations. Net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre.
Enterprise Debt. Consolidated Debt plus our pro rata share of total debt from our unconsolidated JVs. Enterprise Debt is a supplemental measure of our financial position, which enables both management and investors to analyze our leverage and to compare our leverage to that of other companies. Our pro rata share of total debt from our unconsolidated JVs is not intended to reflect our actual liability or ability to access assets should there be a default under any or all such loans or a liquidation of the JVs.
Funds From Operations (“Nareit FFO”) and FFO as Adjusted. FFO encompasses Nareit FFO and FFO as Adjusted, each of which is described in detail below. We believe FFO applicable to common shares, diluted FFO applicable to common shares, and diluted FFO per common share are important supplemental non-GAAP measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets utilizes straight-line depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that use historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue.
Nareit FFO. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”), is net income (loss) applicable to common shares (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciable property, including any current and deferred taxes directly associated with sales of depreciable property, impairments of, or related to, depreciable real estate, plus real estate and other real estate-related depreciation and amortization, and adjustments to compute our share of Nareit FFO and FFO as Adjusted (see below) from joint ventures. Adjustments for joint ventures are calculated to reflect our pro rata share of both our consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. We reflect our share of Nareit FFO for unconsolidated joint ventures by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period to the applicable reconciling items on an entity by entity basis. For consolidated joint ventures in which we do not own 100%, we reflect our share of the equity by adjusting our Nareit FFO to remove the third party ownership share of the applicable reconciling items based on actual ownership percentage for the applicable periods. Our pro rata share information is prepared on a basis consistent with the comparable consolidated amounts, is intended to reflect our proportionate economic interest in the operating results of properties in our portfolio and is calculated by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period. We do not control the unconsolidated joint ventures, and the pro rata presentations of reconciling items included in Nareit FFO do not represent our legal claim to such items. The joint venture members or partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the joint venture agreements, which provide for such allocations generally according to their invested capital.
The presentation of pro rata information has limitations, which include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage determined when applying the equity method of accounting and do not necessarily represent our legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses and (ii) other companies in our industry may calculate their pro rata interest differently, limiting the usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, the pro rata financial information should not be considered independently or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP financial statements, using the pro rata financial information as a supplement.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 89 |
Appendix A
Nareit FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss). We compute Nareit FFO in accordance with the current Nareit definition; however, other REITs may report Nareit FFO differently or have a different interpretation of the current Nareit definition from ours.
FFO as Adjusted. In addition, we present Nareit FFO on an adjusted basis before the impact of non-comparable items including, but not limited to, transaction-relatedtransaction and merger-related items, other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains), restructuring and severance-related charges, prepayment costs (benefits) associated with early retirement or payment of debt, litigation costs (recoveries), casualty-related charges (recoveries), foreign currency remeasurement losses (gains), deferred tax asset valuation allowances, and changes in tax legislation (“FFO as Adjusted”). These adjustments are net of tax, when applicable. Transaction-relatedTransaction and merger-related items include transaction expenses and gains/charges incurred as a result of mergers and acquisitions and lease amendment or termination activities. Prepayment costs (benefits) associated with early retirement of debt include the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of debt. Other impairments (recoveries) and other losses (gains) include interest income associated with early and partial repayments of loans receivable and other losses or gains associated with non-depreciable assets including goodwill, DFLs, undeveloped land parcels, and loans receivable. Management believes that FFO as Adjusted provides a meaningful supplemental measurement of our FFO run-rate and is frequently used by analysts, investors, and other interested parties in the evaluation of our performance as a REIT. At the same time that Nareit created and defined its FFO measure for the REIT industry, it also recognized that “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” We believe stockholders, potential investors, and financial analysts who review our operating performance are best served by an FFO run-rate earnings measure that includes certain other adjustments to net income (loss), in addition to adjustments made to arrive at the Nareit defined measure of FFO. FFO as Adjusted is used by management in analyzing our business and the performance of our properties and we believe it is important that stockholders, potential investors, and financial analysts understand this measure used by management. We use FFO as Adjusted to: (i) evaluate our performance in comparison with expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions, (ii) evaluate the performance of our management, (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources, (iv) assess our performance as compared with similar real estate companies and the industry in general, and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Other REITs or real estate companies may use different methodologies for calculating an adjusted FFO measure, and accordingly, our FFO as Adjusted may not be comparable to those reported by other REITs.
Net Debt. Enterprise Debt less the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and expected net proceeds from the future settlement of shares issued through our equity forward contracts, as reported in our consolidated financial statements and our pro rata share of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from our unconsolidated JVs. Consolidated Debt is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Net Debt. Net Debt is a supplemental measure of our financial position, which enables both management and investors to analyze our leverage and to compare our leverage to that of other companies.
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDAre. Net Debt divided by Adjusted EBITDAre is a supplemental measure of our ability to decrease our debt. Because we may not be able to use our cash to reduce our debt on a dollar-for-dollar basis, this measure may have material limitations.
Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and Cash (Adjusted) NOI. NOI and Adjusted NOI are non-GAAP supplemental financial measures used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate. NOI is defined as real estate revenues (inclusive of rental and related revenues, resident fees and services, income from direct financing leases, and government grant income and exclusive of interest income), less property level operating expenses; NOI excludes all other financial statement amounts included in net income (loss). Adjusted NOI is calculated as NOI after eliminating the effects of straight-line rents, DFL non-cash interest, amortization of market lease intangibles, termination fees, actuarial reserves for insurance claims that have been incurred but not reported, and the impact of deferred community fee income and expense. NOI and Adjusted NOI are calculated as NOI and Adjusted NOI from consolidated properties, plus our share of NOI and Adjusted NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures (calculated by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period), less noncontrolling interests’ share of NOI and Adjusted NOI from consolidated joint ventures (calculated by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period). Management utilizes its share of NOI and Adjusted NOI in assessing its performance as we have various joint ventures that contribute to its performance. We do not control our unconsolidated joint ventures, and our share of amounts from unconsolidated joint ventures do not represent our legal claim to such items. Our share of NOI and Adjusted NOI should not be considered a substitute for, and should only be considered together with and as a supplement to, our financial information presented in accordance with GAAP.
90 | HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES |
Appendix A
Adjusted NOI is oftentimes referred to as “Cash NOI.” Management believes NOI and Adjusted NOI are important supplemental measures because they provide relevant and useful information by reflecting only income and operating expense items that are incurred at the property level and present them on an unlevered basis. We use NOI and Adjusted NOI to make decisions about resource allocations, to assess and compare property level performance, and to evaluate our Same-Store (“SS”) performance, as described below. We believe that net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI and Adjusted NOI. NOI and Adjusted NOI should not be viewed as alternative measures of operating performance to net income (loss) as defined by GAAP since they do not reflect various excluded items. Further, our definitions of NOI and Adjusted NOI may not be comparable to the definitions used by other REITs or real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI and Adjusted NOI. Operating expenses generally relate to leased outpatient medical office and life science properties,lab buildings, as well as CCRC facilities. We generally recover all or a portion of our leased outpatient medical office and life sciencelab property expenses through tenant recoveries. We present expenses as operating or general and administrative based on the underlying nature of the expense.
Normalized FFO Per Share. Normalized FFO Per Share is a measure used for our compensation metrics and is defined as Diluted FFO as Adjusted per common share, further adjusted to exclude the effect of any special charges or other special circumstances as may be determined by the Compensation Committee. For purposes of this metric, the Compensation Committee has determined to exclude the positive impact of CARES Act funding.
Portfolio Income. Cash (Adjusted) NOI plus interest income plus our pro rata share of Cash (Adjusted) NOI from our unconsolidated JVs less noncontrolling interests’ pro rata share of Cash (Adjusted) NOI from consolidated JVs. Management believes that Portfolio Income is an important supplemental measure because it provides relevant and useful information regarding our performance; specifically, it is a measure of our property level profitability of the Company inclusive of interest income. Management believes that net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Portfolio Income. Portfolio Income should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income (loss) as defined by GAAP since it does not reflect various excluded items.
Same-Store (“SS”). Same-Store NOI and Cash (Adjusted) NOI information allows us to evaluate the performance of our property portfolio under a consistent population by eliminating changes in the composition of our portfolio of properties, excluding properties within the other non-reportable segments. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, as well as properties owned by our unconsolidated joint ventures in Same-Store NOI and Adjusted NOI (see NOI definition above for further discussion regarding our use of pro-rata share information and its limitations). Same-Store NOI and Adjusted NOI exclude government grant income under the CARES Act. Same-Store Adjusted NOI also excludes amortization of deferred revenue from tenant-funded improvements and certain non-property specific operating expenses that are allocated to each operating segment on a consolidated basis. Properties are included in Same-Store once they are stabilized for the full period in both comparison periods. Newly acquired operating assets are generally considered stabilized at the earlier of lease-up (typically when the tenant(s) control(s) the physical use of at least 80% of the space and rental payments have commenced) or 12 months from the acquisition date. Newly completed developments and redevelopments are considered stabilized at the earlier of lease-up or 24 months from the date the property is placed in service. Properties that experience a change in reporting structure are considered stabilized after 12 months in operations under a consistent reporting structure. A property is removed from Same-Store when it is classified as held for sale, sold, placed into redevelopment, experiences a casualty event that significantly impacts operations, a change in reporting structure or operator transition has been agreed to, or a significant tenant relocates from a Same-Store property to a non Same-Store property and that change results in a corresponding increase in revenue. We do not report Same-Store metrics for our other non-reportable segments.
**
2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 91 |
Appendix B
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
2023 Performance Incentive Plan
(ADOPTED FEBRUARY 2, 2023)
Notwithstanding the foregoing and except for an adjustment pursuant to Section 7.1 or a repricing approved by stockholders, in no case may the Administrator (1) amend an outstanding stock option or SAR to reduce the exercise price or base price of the award, (2) cancel, exchange or surrender an outstanding stock option or SAR in exchange for cash or other awards for the purpose of repricing the award, or (3) cancel, exchange, or surrender an outstanding stock option or SAR in exchange for an option or SAR with an exercise or base price that is less than the exercise or base price of the original award.
Appendix B
| ||
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
In no event shall any shares newly-issued by the Company be issued for less than the minimum lawful consideration for such shares or for consideration other than consideration permitted by applicable state law. The Administrator shall not permit any participant to pay any portion of the exercise or purchase price of any award granted under this Plan by means of a promissory note. Shares of Common Stock used to satisfy the exercise price of an option shall be valued at their fair market value on the date of exercise. The Company will not be obligated to deliver any shares unless and until it receives full payment of the exercise or purchase price therefor and any related withholding obligations under Section 8.5 and any other conditions to exercise or purchase have been satisfied. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the applicable award agreement, the Administrator may at any time eliminate or limit a participant’s ability to pay the purchase or exercise price of any award or shares by any method other than cash payment to the Company.
Appendix B
Appendix B
| ||
|
Appendix B
| ||
Appendix B
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Change in Control Event constitutes a payment event with respect to any award which provides for the deferral of compensation that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, to the extent required to avoid the imposition of additional taxes under Section 409A of the Code, the transaction or event described in clause (a), (b), (c) or (d) with respect to such award shall only constitute a Change in Control Event for purposes of the payment timing of such award if such transaction also constitutes a “change in control event,” as defined in Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5). The Administrator shall have full and final authority to determine conclusively whether a Change in Control Event of the Company has occurred pursuant to the above definition, the date of the occurrence of such Change in Control Event and any incidental matters relating thereto.
Appendix B
In any case where a tax is required to be withheld in connection with the delivery of shares of Common Stock under this Plan, the Administrator may in its sole discretion (subject to Section 8.1) require or grant (either at the time of the award or thereafter) to the participant the right to elect, pursuant to such rules and subject to such conditions as the Administrator may establish, that the Company reduce the number of shares to be delivered by (or otherwise reacquire) the appropriate number of shares, valued in a consistent manner at their fair market value or at the sales price in accordance with authorized procedures for cashless exercises, necessary to satisfy the applicable withholding obligation on exercise, vesting or payment. The Company may not accept a promissory note from any Eligible Person in connection with taxes required to be withheld upon the exercise, vesting or payment of any award under this Plan.
Appendix B
Appendix B
* * *
Helpful Resources
Weblinks
Board of Directors | healthpeak.com/leadership/board-of-directors/ |
Board Committee Composition | healthpeak.com/leadership/board-of-directors/ |
committee-composition/ | |
Board Committee Charters | healthpeak.com/esg/governance/ |
Audit Committee Charter | |
Compensation and Human Capital Committee Charter | |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter | |
Executive Team | healthpeak.com/leadership/executive-team/ |
Investor Relations | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
Financial Information | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
SEC Filings | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
Investor Presentations | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
Press Releases | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
ESG | healthpeak.com/esg/ |
Annual ESG Report | healthpeak.com/esg/ |
Environmental Initiatives | healthpeak.com/esg/environment/ |
Social Initiatives | healthpeak.com/esg/social/ |
Governance Initiatives | healthpeak.com/esg/governance/ |
Historical Reports | healthpeak.com/esg/historical-reports/ |
Sustainable Finance | healthpeak.com/esg/sustainable-finance/ |
Corporate Governance Documents | healthpeak.com/esg/governance/ |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | |
Vendor Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | |
Corporate Governance Guidelines | |
Learn More | |
Corporate Website | healthpeak.com |
FAQs | ir.healthpeak.com/resources/investor-faqs/ |
Email Alerts | ir.healthpeak.com/ |
Weblinks are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites does not constitute a part of this proxy statement.
Corporate Secretary Board of Directors Investor Relations |
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. Georgeson LLC To Vote Your Shares |
Back to Contents |
|
| |
SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE |
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2023.24, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web sitewebsite and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
VOTE BY MAIL
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | |
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | |
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
The Board of Directors recommends you vote “FOR” each of the director nominees named in proposal 1 and “FOR” proposals 2 | |||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors | For | Abstain | ||||||||
1a. Scott M. Brinker | o | o | |||||||||
1b. Katherine M. Sandstrom | o | o | o | ||||||||
1c. John T. Thomas | o | o | |||||||||
1d. Brian G. Cartwright | o | o | |||||||||
o | o | ||||||||||
o | o | ||||||||||
1g. Pamela J. Kessler | |||||||||||
o | |||||||||||
1h. Sara G. Lewis | o | o | o | ||||||||
1i. Ava E. Lias-Booker | o | ||||||||||
1j. Tommy G. Thompson | o | o | o | ||||||||
1k. Richard A. Weiss | o | ||||||||||
o | o | ||||||||||
For | Against | Abstain | ||||||||||||
2. | ||||||||||||||
Approval of | o | o | ||||||||||||
3. | ||||||||||||||
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Healthpeak Properties, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, | o | o | ||||||||||||
NOTE:At their discretion, the named proxies are authorized to consider and vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Thursday, April 27, 202325, 20249:308:00 a.m. PacificCentral Time
Held In Person
Hilton Franklin Cool Springs
601 Corporate Centre Drive
Franklin, TN 37067
AC Hotel by Marriott San Francisco Airport/Oyster Point Waterfront
1333 Veterans Boulevard
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 20222023 Annual Report are available at
http://materials.proxyvote.com/Healthpeak.
You can also view these materials at www.proxyvote.comby using the 16-digit control number provided on this proxy card.
V33888-P05326 |
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
for use at the Annual Meeting on April 27, 2023.25, 2024.
This proxy is revocable and, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no choice is specified, the proxy (if signed) will be voted “FOR” each of the eighteleven director nominees named in Proposal 1 and “FOR” Proposals 2 4, and 5, and “1 YEAR” for Proposal 3. The shares entitled to be voted by the undersigned will be cast in the discretion of the proxies named above on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.